Towards_the_gap said:It only raises alarm bells for me in that everyone in the media seems to believe it. He could have said anything. I seriously doubt he was a Royal Marines Commando......after all, none of these fruitcakes are ever chefs or mechanics right?
ArmyVern said:Actually, no one -- not even the CF spokeperson has denied his previous military service. So rather -- I'd suspect that's because it's a fact.
For all those of you yelling and screaming "HOW??", "How would the Royal Marines not have noticed", "What's happening to the recruiter who missed this etc" ... perhaps you should all re-read they very first article ...
where "the second coming himself" has stated that he never experienced these feelings or wanted to do these things until AFTER he was charged, and found innocent of those BC murders. He says that dealing with all that ... is what led to his current state.
Sometimes, it helps to read the entire thread ... and the articles reffed if one wants to avoid ranting about "Marine time" etc that occured well before the mental issues did.
OberstSteiner said:I really don't think this person all of a sudden went bat-crap-crazy AFTER he joined the forces! There must have been some signs that he was nuts during the interview, as I cannot believe someone like that falls through the cracks.
OberstSteiner said:There must have been some signs that he was nuts during the interview, as I cannot believe someone like that falls through the cracks.
Michael O`Leary said:And what skills are you expecting a military career counselor to have that would enable pronouncing someone "bat-crap-crazy" during a recruiting interview? I am quite certain if he was drooling and chanting throughout the interview it would have been noted.
Try to imagine the crap that would arise if someone thought their application was turned down because some recruiter decided they weren't right in the head. Read the forums here, we can't even get people to understand that their serious medical problems are rational grounds for denying their presumed "right" to serve, even after they've been formally refused.
OberstSteiner said:All that and no bells went off? But someone who teaches English in Japan for a year gets put through the ringer and waits for 2 years for the check to come back? It seems that things are done in a half-assed manner or extremely anal and thorough; common sense never coming into the equation. :rage:
They can turn down your application if they simply do not like your face! I have read the forums and the medical problems you speak of have nothing to do with what I said. What do you think the officer interview is all about? It is because you made it that far based on the right paperwork, but the interview is where they wean out the undesirables. And that can be capricious.Michael O`Leary said:And what skills are you expecting a military career counselor to have that would enable pronouncing someone "bat-crap-crazy" during a recruiting interview? I am quite certain if he was drooling and chanting throughout the interview it would have been noted.
Try to imagine the crap that would arise if someone thought their application was turned down because some recruiter decided they weren't right in the head. Read the forums here, we can't even get people to understand that their serious medical problems are rational grounds for denying their presumed "right" to serve, even after they've been formally refused.
George Wallace said:'Just going back to this.
The above shows a lack of knowledge of what actually happens in these "Checks". First off, there are different agreements between the Governments of Japan and Canada, and those between the Governments of Canada and the UK. On one hand you may have very cooperative links between Police and Intelligence agencies of the Commonwealth countries, and none or very little between non-Commonwealth nations. Sadly, if there is no way to confirm a person's records in a foreign nation, then that person is "on hold" for a long time, until such records can be produced, verified or cleared.
Second; nothing is done half-assed. Yes they have to be anal and thorough. What do you expect of a Security Check? Or perhaps you figure we should just hand out automatic weapons and control of artillery pieces to any Joe Blow on the street? Think about it. You are talking about the Security of the Nation, not a job at Micky D's.
:
OberstSteiner said:They can turn down your application if they simply do not like your face! I have read the forums and the medical problems you speak of have nothing to do with what I said. What do you think the officer interview is all about? It is because you made it that far based on the right paperwork, but the interview is where they wean out the undesirables. And that can be capricious.
OberstSteiner said:With all due respect Mr.Wallace, I have to say bullsh1t to that. You don't think things in the recruiting process happen in a half-*** fashion? Try the Montreal recruiting center versus the Calgary center. In Montreal I had the officer interview, bypassing the pre-sec clearance entirely. Moving out west and having to 'transfer' my file, the recruiters told me they were 'by the books' and decided to make me go through the pre-sec procedure that Montreal decided to skip. Does that sound as if things are done in a consistant and even-handed fashion? I speak from personal experience, not out of my ***. Out of respect I will also not insult you by adding the rolling eyes to my post.
ps. I am not disenchanted with the CF at all, I just think the culture of bureaucracy in the recruiting process is a joke. They talk the talk, but I haven't seen any streamlining of my application. And I am certainly not just 'off the street', I was in the godamn reserves prior to my full time application. What are they expecting to find, that I was inducted into the Japanese Aum Shinrikyo terrorist cult whilst a teacher?
OberstSteiner said:Isn't the interview process part of the recruiting process? Seemed to me that i was the last step. The only thing I am trying to say is that the nut job should not have made it past the interview process. Sure, everything before that is paperwork and certainly no recruiter will have the time,training or know how to pick up on anything suggesting mental illness, nor would it be possible. The interview, a sit down, one on one with an educated person should be a good opportunity to see if things are as they should be, and is 'deliberately subjective' as you say . I am sure the guy didn't just decide one day he was the frickin' messiah.
OberstSteiner said:With all due respect Mr.Wallace, I have to say bullsh1t to that. You don't think things in the recruiting process happen in a half-*** fashion? Try the Montreal recruiting center versus the Calgary center. In Montreal I had the officer interview, bypassing the pre-sec clearance entirely. Moving out west and having to 'transfer' my file, the recruiters told me they were 'by the books' and decided to make me go through the pre-sec procedure that Montreal decided to skip. Does that sound as if things are done in a consistant and even-handed fashion? I speak from personal experience, not out of my ***. Out of respect I will also not insult you by adding the rolling eyes to my post.
ps. I am not disenchanted with the CF at all, I just think the culture of bureaucracy in the recruiting process is a joke. They talk the talk, but I haven't seen any streamlining of my application. And I am certainly not just 'off the street', I was in the godamn reserves prior to my full time application. What are they expecting to find, that I was inducted into the Japanese Aum Shinrikyo terrorist cult whilst a teacher?
OberstSteiner said:Isn't the interview process part of the recruiting process? Seemed to me that i was the last step. The only thing I am trying to say is that the nut job should not have made it past the interview process. ... The interview, a sit down, one on one with an educated person should be a good opportunity to see if things are as they should be, and is 'deliberately subjective' as you say . I am sure the guy didn't just decide one day he was the frickin' messiah.
ArmyVern said:And you're going Officer??
No worries ... I'll add them: :
Gawd help us ... may attitudes such as yours be the minority -- the "I'M SPECIAL & DESERVE STREAMLINING" attitude --- perhaps your interviewer picked up on that??
Word up -- you are not special despite your protestations otherwise, nor is a single one of us in this Team.