• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

"Canadian diamonds are no better than conflict diamonds from Africa."

Michael OLeary

Army.ca Fixture
Subscriber
Donor
Inactive
Reaction score
5
Points
430
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/ottawa/story/2006/12/08/conflict-diamond.html


First Nations leader slams Canadian diamonds
Last Updated: Friday, December 8, 2006 | 12:18 PM ET
CBC News

A First Nations group in Ontario is trying to dissuade Americans from buying Canadian diamonds this holiday season, saying the jewels are mined at the expense of its people.

Alvin Fiddler, deputy grand chief of the Nishnawbe Aski Nation, said De Beers Canada in particular is causing environmental devastation and disrupting his community of 45,000 Cree and Ojibwa in northern Ontario.

"They're not clean diamonds; they're not conflict-free diamonds," Fiddler told CBC News. "People are paying a price for these diamonds and it's our people in the Nishnawbe Aski Nation. Our people, our children, are languishing in poverty while these resources are being extracted from their territory."

Fiddler this week had an editorial published in the diamond industry trade publication Rapaport News, in which he outlined his concerns about Canadian diamond exploration and mining. He says several communities have called for a moratorium on mineral exploration on land where the legal title is under dispute.

"The battle over diamonds will be largely fought in the United States, where annual sales of diamond jewelry represent almost half of the $55 billion sold worldwide. The time is now for consumers in the United States to connect the dots and weigh in," Fiddler wrote in his editorial.

"Tell De Beers, other diamond miners and Canada that unless things change, Canadian diamonds are no better than conflict diamonds from Africa."

Linda Dorrington, a spokeswoman for De Beers said the company is making an effort to negotiate with First Nations in Canada but said land rights need to be decided by government. The company has one project underway along with exploration work within Nishnawbe Aski territory.

"We encourage the government and these groups to continue to work together to get these matters settled," she said.

Fiddler said the diamond company should stop work until the government settles the land claims.

The trade in diamonds originating in conflict zones, sometimes called "blood diamonds," has helped pay for wars in Africa that have killed millions in Angola, Sierra Leone, Liberia and Congo.

Under heavy criticism from human rights activists, governments, non-governmental organizations and industry enacted the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme in 2002, which tracks diamonds from the mine to the store.

Jewelers are bracing for more consumer scrutiny this season with the opening of the new film Blood Diamond set amid the brutal civil war in Sierra Leone in the late 1990s. Industry officials have launched a high-profile campaign, saying the Kimberley Process has curbed the "blood diamond" trade.
 
Funny thing about "blood diamonds" (the latest craze of the Hollywood elite).  It was indeed a problem: 3 or 4 years ago, when some 17% of diamonds sold were of the so-called "blood" variety.  The problem has since subsided to the point where less than 1% sold are of that variety now.  (Source: TV show I watched last night, although I cannot remember the name).  Moral of this story was that some countries in Africa may suffer due to the movie due to perception: people won't buy diamonds of a certain nation (exact nation fails me right now), even though the diamond industry pumps bazillions into the national economy.

But that's OK: TomKat tm can get married for billions as Africa starves, yet he will still get in your face on television for your hard earned money to help the unfortunate in the world.
 
I guess as soon as we wash away Mr. Fiddler's tears with an ocean of money, all will be right in the world - the environmental devastation will be acceptable, his people's poverty will be alleviated - just like how it worked accross the rest of the country.
 
The only way these would be considered "Blood Diamonds" is in the greed of the First Nations in putting this claim forward and their trying once again to get 'blood' out of the 'evil White man'.  These diamonds are coming from underground and Canadian Mineral Rights are such that Treaties have nothing to do with them.  The same goes for the Mineral Rights under everyone's property.  It is a greedy attempt by some to milk the corporations that have brought employment to their region.  The mining companies have gone out of their way to hire and train the locals to work in their mines at very good wages.  

This whole claim is BULL SHIT.  It is just outright GREED.  "Money for nothing" and giving all First Nations a bad name as if they were all greedy welfare recipients.
 
There was a piece about blood diamonds (Dec. 5th) on TVO's "The Agenda."  In the context of Angola, Sierra Leone, etc., it referred to the use of slave labour to mine diamonds that were sold to buy arms for rebels.  I find the native leader's analogy...[insert adjective here].

http://www.tvo.org/cfmx/tvoorg/theagenda/

There is also a new movie on this subject.  If you like Leonardo DiCaprio, enjoy!  However, the reviews say it's [insert a similar adjective here].

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/blood_diamond/
 
I got it, build a casino! That will smooth things over   
 
A First Nations group in Ontario is trying to dissuade Americans from buying Canadian diamonds this holiday season, saying the jewels are mined at the expense of its people.

I don't think the First Nations are trying to get any money out of this. I think it is an actual concern. So, because it's a Native issue, it has to be connected with welfare and money?

The one group is trying to dissuade Americans from buying Canadian diamonds. American interest in diamonds would be an asset to the group if they wanted money.
 
Okay, if nobody buys the rocks, layoffs happen.  Local people, FN included, go without cash, and starve, and go on EI/welfare.  What good does this do the poor exploited peoples?  Not a GD bit, that's what.
 
Miss Jacqueline said:
I don't think the First Nations are trying to get any money out of this.

"People are paying a price for these diamonds and it's our people in the Nishnawbe Aski Nation. Our people, our children, are languishing in poverty while these resources are being extracted from their territory."
Fiddler said the diamond company should stop work until the government settles the land claims.

Miss Jacqueline said:
I think it is an actual concern.

What is the concern?
Causing environmental devastation and disrupting his community?
 
Where exactly is this mine, and how is it causing damage to the enviroment? Also how can a huge employer such as a new mine hurt the economy of his region?
 
author=Frankie link=topic=54383/post-493285#msg493285 date=1165719351
What is the concern?Causing environmental devastation and disrupting his community?

Well, yes. That is what it looks like to me.
 
Frankie said:
"People are paying a price for these diamonds and it's our people in the Nishnawbe Aski Nation. Our people, our children, are languishing in poverty while these resources are being extracted from their territory."

This was enough of a concern for a couple lines in the article.  ;)
 
The only production diamonds from Canada are from:
A) Ekati a BHP mine with heavy involvement and commitment from both the Dhe-cho
B) Diavik <again heavy first nations involvement>
C) Snap Lake <De Beers Canada> also has some production as does the Tehara mine.

Currently all southern mines are years away from any production, so right now a boycott would only effect the North and mostly first nations. By the way having been involved in training workers for the mines, working at the mines and also spending some time in the Gold mines, the Diamond guys are the only ones who have a clear plan for remediation the sites once completed and recognition the first nations groups are the "guardians of the land"
 
>saying the jewels are mined at the expense of its people.

>"People are paying a price for these diamonds and it's our people in the Nishnawbe Aski Nation. Our people, our children, are languishing in poverty while these resources are being extracted from their territory."

The concern is that they're not getting what they perceive to be their cut of the profits.  (I don't know whether they own the rights to the diamonds or not.)
 
Brad Sallows said:
The concern is that they're not getting what they perceive to be their cut of the profits.  (I don't know whether they own the rights to the diamonds or not.)

How do you know this for sure?
 
This is spurious.  Why?  Simply because Canada requires companies to negotiate impacts benefits agreements with First Nations whether a claim is signed or not.   IBA's cover a whole host of subjects from direct employment to service and supply contracts to scholarship funds to environmental co- management regimes.

The Ekati mine is the precedent and the model.  BHP (the company)  and the Dogrib people entered into an IBA before the the Dogrib claim was settled.   In fact the process of negotiating an IBA may have even contributed to the settling of the claim because it was a confidence building measure as Canada demanded the IBA be negotiated and covered the costs of the Dogrib negotiation team but did not participate in it.  As a matter of fact Canada has not even (officially) seen the IBA.

The real problem here is that several FN communities can't coalesce amongst themselves to develop a negotiating position but don't want to lose face so they deflect the real issue.

.
 
If they want money they can get a job.  They already get their tax-exemption cards, native status, and money from the government, we get none of this and we manage to "scrape by". ::)
 
Back
Top