• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

"Canadian diamonds are no better than conflict diamonds from Africa."

....and money doesn't help them in the least. We have had several go through the old Correctional Centre in Guelph and NOTHING makes them heal.

One in particular that was on 'my' floor for over a year even said that all the money did was make self-destruction more affordable and that his money was long gone.
 
A bit more information, presented without comment....

Letter to Nishnawbe Aski Nation

Chief Mike Carpenter Responds to Deputy Grand Chief Alvin Fiddler

    ATTAWAPISKAT, ON, Dec. 22 /CNW/ -

    <<
                              Chief and Council
                            Attawapiskat, Ontario
                                  P0L 1A0

    December 11, 2006

    Nishnawbe-Aski Nation
    710 Victoria Avenue East, 3rd Floor
    Thunder Bay, ON P7C 5P7

    Attention: Alvin Fiddler, Deputy Grand Chief
    --------------------------------------------

    Dear Deputy Grand Chief Fiddler:

        Re: Your Recent Editorial Regarding Mineral Exploration in Ontario

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We are writing to inform you that Attawapiskat takes issue with your
recent editorial in the Rapaport News where you used inaccurate information
that indirectly included mineral exploration in Attawapiskat's traditional
territory. You wrote:

        Instead the hunt for these rare gems from the heart of the Earth has
        meant only conflict and strife for us. De Beers plans to develop
        massive open pit diamond mining projects in our traditional territory
        but it is not honoring our treaty rights or working with us to win
        our consent for the projects.

    You wrote this despite without even asking us for our input.

    There is only one diamond mine currently being built in Ontario at this
moment, and that is the Victor Project in our territories. Your comment is
obviously directed there, however, if you are referring to other First Nations
we refrain from comment. You omitted the fact that Attawapiskat took a
proactive approach to its aboriginal rights and title and negotiated an Impact
Benefit Agreement, a landmark agreement which will set a benchmark for other
such agreements between First Nations and industry. With strong legal
representation and the assertion of our rights, Attawapiskat fought strongly
with De Beers and both levels of government using our rights to our territory
for what we obtained in our IBA: education and training, contracting and
employment preferences, environmental monitoring and guarantees, and financial
benefits. The conflict was eventually settled in the form of the IBA.
Attawapiskat has benefited and will benefit greatly in the future from this
development, which you totally ignored in your remarks. All of this came about
without any help from NAN: no funding, no political support and no legal
support.

    You also wrote:

        Before they can claim to have done the right thing in Canada,
        De Beers and other Canadian diamond mining companies must demonstrate
        a different attitude and pattern of behaviour.

        They must allow us to determine where, when and how diamond mining
        will take place, if at all. They must also work with us and the
        Canadian governments to protect the great Boreal Forest ecosystem and
        make sure it continues to provide clean air, clean water and abundant
        wildlife for our communities and for the world.

    Our IBA also requires Attawapiskat's consent if De Beers wishes to develop
any further kimberlites in our territory, which makes the above quoted remarks
inaccurate. We fail to see how NAN's purpose is to represent our interests and
those of our fellow Ontario First Nations when you unilaterally decide to make
such statements.
    If you felt the need to comment on this Project, you should have consulted
with us, since the existence of the IBA is well known at NAN. While your
article discussed how each First Nation must decide for itself if and how
development should occur in its traditional territory, you totally ignored the
fact that our IBA is a benchmark to be met and exceeded that other First
Nations will benefit from. We are concerned that your comments, which might be
intended to refer to other communities suggests misinformation about our
lands, our IBA and our approach rather than pointing out solutions.
    We would be more than happy to provide other First Nations who are members
of NAN with an outline of our approach and successes in asserting our rights
in order to achieve respect from De Beers and good results in an historic IBA
in Ontario.
    We hope that take this into consideration when you make such statements in
the future.

    Thank you,

    Chief Mike Carpenter

 
Methinks that Chief Mike Carpenter writes a good letter.
 
I see a trend emerging.
What is similar with all 3:
1)Caledonia: land became "sacred" ONLY after it was developed, prior to that it was not sacred enough to be 'sold'
2)Wind Power generators: after they were build, suddenly AIR that was going over that land became property of that band...  ::)
3)This diamond mine: they had a say before construction started.

So, as soon as something gets developed and becomes profitable, it becomes "sacred". What happened to the old idea that NO ONE owns the land?

PS
I didnt know natives used to hunt with rifles on skidoos before pale-face came here.
 
Another issue along the same lines occurred here in Victoria regarding the development of the Bear Mountain facility. A "sacred cave" was discovered after it was all but blown up by developers. The solution? The government of BC is allowing them to operate a casino on the premises as a pseudo repayment for the infringement. The sacred cave? Who cares now, a casino is in the works.

http://www.pej.org/html/print.php?sid=6161



 
Back
Top