• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Ebola: outbreak, Canadian/other response (merged)

Crantor said:
We also have to consider that in the US and Canada, contact tracing is much more developed than in Africa where, i think it is damned near impossible to conduct effectively.

Agreed it is better, but the events in Dallas shows that it is only as good as the person on the receiving end and that was with a person who had a distinct history. You get an infected person that does not know they have it and did not travel there, but picked it up say from the Paris International Airport and it is likely they will also get misdiagnosed.

As for quarantine, it does work and has worked in the past. 
 
Colin P said:
Agreed it is better, but the events in Dallas shows that it is only as good as the person on the receiving end and that was with a person who had a distinct history. You get an infected person that does not know they have it and did not travel there, but picked it up say from the Paris International Airport and it is likely they will also get misdiagnosed.

As for quarantine, it does work and has worked in the past.

Misdiagnosis is definitly a risk but consider this.  Ebola is contagious when symptoms start showing such as fever, vomiting etc.  It has a two week incubation period.  So even if someone slipped through the cracks eventually they will need hospitalisation.  they will likely suspect malaria or even a severe case of the flu in which case the same isolation protocols that exist for ebola are enacted.  When testing comes back positive for Ebola you still have time to track down anyone that that specific patient had contact with.  So we might see a cluster where some secondary or possibly tertiary infection might occur it would most likely be stopped at that point given the incubation period.  Close contact would in almost all cases be family and easily tracked. 

If you caught something at the Paris airport it would have been something significant, like vomit or bleeding.  Something airpiort authorities are on the look out for even in a non-ebola emergency situation.

Emergency workers are always at higher risk for obvious reasons, so a nurse in dallas catching it is not surprising and by all accounts she was contained.

You have more to worry about with rabbies, Hep C and a whole host of stuff.  More people will die this year from the flu than any ebola oubreak here will.  Ebola is indeed scary and horrible but only if you live in a place like Africa where it is an almost garanteed death sentence.
 
I remain quite unconvinced about how good our procedures are for this and when this takes off in Africa, it will bleed into Southern Europe first and if it gets into Central America we have at least 2 mass vectors for it to arrive. 

The people I have talked who go regularly to Serra Leone to give medical aid have little good to say about the WHO and their figures, so likley the WHO is/has been under reporting by a significant amount.

http://www.news1130.com/2014/10/14/who-official-there-could-be-up-to-10000-new-cases-of-ebola-per-week-in-2-months/
GENEVA – The death rate in the Ebola outbreak has risen to 70 per cent and there could be up to 10,000 new cases a week in two months, the World Health Organization warned Tuesday.

WHO assistant director-general Dr. Bruce Aylward gave the grim figures during a news conference in Geneva. Previously, WHO had estimated the death rate at around 50 per cent.

Aylward said the 70 per cent death rate was “a high mortality disease” in any circumstance and that the U.N. health agency was still focused on trying to get sick people isolated and provide treatment as early as possible.

He told reporters that if the world’s response to the Ebola crisis isn’t stepped up within 60 days, “a lot more people will die” and there will be a huge need to deal with the spiraling numbers of cases.

For the last four weeks, there’s been about 1,000 new cases per week — including suspected, confirmed and probable cases, he said, adding that the U.N. health agency is aiming to get 70 per cent of cases isolated within two months to reverse the outbreak.

WHO increased its Ebola death toll tally to 4,447 people on Tuesday, nearly all of them in West Africa, from 8,914 cases.

Sierra Leone, Guinea and Liberia have been hardest hit nations in the current outbreak. Aylward said WHO was very concerned about the continued spread of Ebola in the three countries’ capital cities —Freetown, Conakry and Monrovia.

He said the agency was still focused on trying to treat Ebola patients, despite the huge demands on the broken health systems in West Africa.

“It would be horrifically unethical to say that we’re just going to isolate people,” he said, noting that new strategies like handing out protective equipment to families and setting up very basic clinics — without much treatment — was a priority.

In Berlin, a U.N. medical worker infected with Ebola in Liberia died despite “intensive medical procedures.” The St. Georg hospital in Leipzig said Tuesday that the 56-year-old man, whose name has not been released, died overnight of the infection.

The man tested positive for Ebola on Oct. 6, prompting Liberia’s U.N. peacekeeping mission to place 41 other staff members under “close medical observation.”

He arrived in Leipzig for treatment on Oct. 9. The hospital’s chief executive, Dr. Iris Minde, said at the time there was no risk of infection for other people, since he was kept in a secure isolation ward specially equipped with negative pressure rooms that are hermetically sealed.

He was the third Ebola patient to be flown to Germany for treatment. The first man recovered and returned home to Senegal. A Uganda aid worker is still being treated in Frankfurt.

 
I would be more worried that ISIS or some other Terrorist group, intentionally infect some of its members and send them to North America. Lots of panic would be created and they are willing to die for their beliefs.
 
Not sure that death is "clean enough" to convince people, going out in a blaze of glory is one thing, but puking your guts out in agony slowly might be a hard sell.
 
Most really excellent crises have sharp inflection points.  The likelihood of the crisis is pooh-poohed and argued away until the Day After.  Almost by definition, crises are never seen coming because no one wishes to see them.

>I'm more worried about the 80 little johnny jhaids that have apparently come back to Canada than I am about ebola.

As already noted, I'd be mostly worried about Johnny Jihadi with citizenship or a Canadian passport who took a detour to be smuggled in and out of a hot zone (no passport stamps) with the single intention of trying to acquire something and get back into Canada while asymptomatic.
 
Meanwhile

An email sent out to the Alcon staff by its CEO reportedly said that the ebola nurse’s boyfriend was admitted into hospital with “Ebola-like symptoms.”

Gotnews.com has received word from two different Alcon employees, both of whom asked not to be identified.

Alcon’s U.S. headquarters are in Fort Worth, Texas. It is an ophthalmological pharmaceutical company.

Requests for comment from Alcon were not returned.

    So, parents work at Alcon and so does Nina Pham's boyfriend.. He's now in quarantine

and......



    DALLAS (CBSDFW.COM) – The CDC has announced that the second healthcare worker diagnosed with Ebola — now identified as Amber Joy Vinson of Dallas — traveled by air Oct. 13, the day before she first reported symptoms.

    The CDC is now reaching out to all passengers who flew on Frontier Airlines flight 1143 Cleveland to Dallas/Fort Worth. The flight landed at 8:16 p.m. CT.

    The CDC is asking all 132 passengers on the flight to call 1 800-CDC INFO (1 800 232-4636). Public health professionals will begin interviewing passengers about the flight after 1 p.m. ET.


and......

Nurses Union Head: 'No Protocols' at Dallas Hospital

Among some of the more serious allegations made by the union were that Duncan was not immediately isolated when he was admitted to the hospital with Ebola symptoms and that the protective gear they initially wore left their necks exposed.

When Duncan was admitted, he was "left for several hours, not in isolation, in an area where other patients were present," Burger told CNN.

As many as seven other patients were in that area, the nurses told the union.

When a nursing supervisor demanded that Duncan be moved to an isolation unit, she faced resistance from hospital officials, the nurses told the union.

In addition, when the nurses treating Duncan complained that their necks had not been covered by the gear, they were told to wrap their necks with medical tape, Burger told CNN.

Hazardous waste also piled up while Duncan was being treated, Burger said, and nurses got no "hands-on training" on how to use the protective gear.

"There was no one to pick up hazardous waste as it piled to the ceiling," Burger told CNN. "They did not have access to proper supplies."

In addition, "There was no mandate for nurses to attend training," Burger added.

Hospital officials did send nursing staff an email about a seminar on Ebola, however.
 
Jerry Pournell provide a roundup of Ebola related events; the picture is not reassuring at all:

http://www.jerrypournelle.com/chaosmanor/a-new-ebola-czar-military-deploys-to-plague-zone-competence-in-government/

A New Ebola Czar; Military deploys to plague zone. Competence in government.
  By Jerry Pournelle | October 17, 2014 - 1:16 pm | Updated: October 17, 2014 - 11:04 pm | View
View 846 Friday, October 17, 2014

“I have observed over the years that the unintended consequences of social action are always more important, and usually less agreeable, than the intended consequences.”

Irving Kristol

“Transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency.”

President Barack Obama, January 31, 2009


“We had been told, on leaving our native soil, that we were going to defend the sacred rights conferred on us by so many of our citizens settled overseas, so many years of our presence, so many benefits brought by us to populations in need of our assistance and our civilization.

“We were able to verify that all this was true, and because it was true, we did not hesitate to shed our quota of blood, to sacrifice our youth and our hopes. We regretted nothing, but whereas we over here are inspired by this frame of mind, I am told that in Rome factions and conspiracies are rife, that treachery flourishes, and that many people in their uncertainty and confusion lend a ready ear to the dire temptations of relinquishment and even to vilify our actions.

“I cannot believe that all this is true, and yet recent wars have shown how pernicious such a state of mind could be and to where it could lead.

“Make haste to reassure us, I beg you, and tell us that our fellow citizens understand us, support us, and protect us as we ourselves are protecting the glory of the Empire.

“If it should be otherwise, if we should have to leave our bleached bones on these desert sands in vain, then beware the fury of the Legions.”


Centurion Marcus Flavinius, Second Cohort, Augusta Legion to his cousin Tertullus in Rome.  No date given.

http://www.jerrypournelle.com/archives2/archives2view/view414.html#Fury

clip_image002[4]

The premise of the liberal philosophy is that good intentions are the most important qualification for government office, and government is more competent to solve social problems than any other institution. Today President Barrack Hussein Obama appointed a political operative to be “Ebola Czar.”

Obama to Tap Former VP Chief of Staff Ron Klain as Ebola ‘Czar’
President Barack Obama will appoint Ron Klain to head up efforts to address the Ebola threat, a senior administration official tells NBC News.

Klain is a former chief of staff to both Vice President Joe Biden and former Vice President Al Gore. He left the vice president’s office in 2011. He is now the president of Case Holdings and serves as the general counsel for Revolution, an investment organization.

"It’s not solely a medical response," White House press secretary Josh Earnest said. "That’s why somebody with Mr. Klain’s credentials — somebody that has strong management experience both inside government but also in the private sector; he is somebody who has strong relationships with members of Congress; and obviously strong relationships with those of us who worked with him here at the White House earlier in the administration. All of that means that he is the right person."

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/ebola-virus-outbreak/obama-tap-former-vp-chief-staff-ron-klain-ebola-czar-n228151

I cannot resist wondering whether his association with Al Gore was thought to be qualification for a post involving scientific observations. Chief of Staff to Al Gore and Joe Biden.



clip_image002[5]

Ebola Scare at Pentagon After Woman Who Was Recently in Africa Vomits on Tour Bus
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2014/10/17/ebola-scare-at-pentagon-after-woman-who-was-recently-in-africa-vomits-on-tour-bus/

Around 9:10 a.m., a woman began vomiting in the Pentagon parking lot while on a bus tour, according to Pentagon spokeswoman Lt. Col. Valerie Henderson. The woman indicated she has recently traveled to Africa.

DC Dept Health Director says woman who got sick on bus had been to Sierra Leon.


This picture taken 26 December 2011 shows the Pentagon building in Washington, DC.  The Pentagon, which is the headquarters of the United States Department of Defense (DOD), is the world's largest office building by floor area, with about 6,500,000 sq ft (600,000 m2), of which 3,700,000 sq ft (340,000 m2) are used as offices.  Approximately 23,000 military and civilian employees and about 3,000 non-defense support personnel work in the Pentagon. AFP PHOTO (Photo credit should read STAFF/AFP/Getty Images)

That one, at least, is not a problem: she has since confessed that she has not recently been in Africa, and physicians are confident that she does not have Ebola.  Of course the Pentagon would not be a target of Ebolized jihad.


Belize Confirms Patient With Ebola Symptoms On Cruise Ship Off Its Coast
http://belizean.com/belize-confirms-patient-with-ebola-symptoms-on-cruise-ship-off-its-coast-1814/


Six Reasons to Panic
By JONATHAN V. LAST

http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/six-reasons-panic_816387.html?nopager=1#

As a rule, one should not panic at whatever crisis has momentarily fixed the attention of cable news producers. But the Ebola outbreak in West Africa, which has migrated to both Europe and America, may be the exception that proves the rule. There are at least six reasons that a controlled, informed panic might be in order.

(1) Start with what we know, and don’t know, about the virus. Officials from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and other government agencies claim that contracting Ebola is relatively difficult because the virus is only transmittable by direct contact with bodily fluids from an infected person who has become symptomatic. Which means that, in theory, you can’t get Ebola by riding in the elevator with someone who is carrying the virus, because Ebola is not airborne.

This sounds reassuring. Except that it might not be true. There are four strains of the Ebola virus that have caused outbreaks in human populations. According to the New England Journal of Medicine, the current outbreak (known as Guinean EBOV, because it originated in Meliandou, Guinea, in late November 2013) is a separate clade “in a sister relationship with other known EBOV strains.” Meaning that this Ebola is related to, but genetically distinct from, previous known strains, and thus may have distinct mechanisms of transmission.

Not everyone is convinced that this Ebola isn’t airborne. Last month, the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy published an article arguing that the current Ebola has “unclear modes of transmission” and that “there is scientific and epidemiologic evidence that Ebola virus has the potential to be transmitted via infectious aerosol particles both near and at a distance from infected patients, which means that healthcare workers should be wearing respirators, not facemasks.”

In August, Science magazine published a survey conducted by 58 medical professionals working in African epidemiology. They traced the origin and spread of the virus with remarkable precision—for instance, they discovered that it crossed the border from Guinea into Sierra Leone at the funeral of a “traditional healer” who had treated Ebola victims. In just the first six months of tracking the virus, the team identified more than 100 mutated forms of it.

Yet what’s really scary is how robust the already-established transmission mechanisms are. Have you ever wondered why Ebola protocols call for washing down infected surfaces with chlorine? Because the virus can survive for up to three weeks on a dry surface.

How robust is transmission? Look at the health care workers who have contracted it. When Nina Pham, the Dallas nurse who was part of the team caring for Liberian national Thomas Duncan, contracted Ebola, the CDC quickly blamed her for “breaching protocol.” But to the extent that we have effective protocols for shielding people from Ebola, they’re so complex that even trained professionals, who are keenly aware that their lives are on the line, can make mistakes.

By the by, that Science article written by 58 medical professionals tracing the emergence of Ebola—5 of them died from Ebola before it was published.

(2) General infection rates are terrifying, too. In epidemiology, you measure the “R0,” or “reproduction number” of a virus; that is, how many new infections each infected person causes. When R0 is greater than 1, the virus is spreading through a population. When it’s below 1, the contamination is receding. In September the World Health Organization’s Ebola Response Team estimated the R0 to be at 1.71 in Guinea and 2.02 in Sierra Leone. Since then, it seems to have risen so that the average in West Africa is about 2.0. In September the WHO estimated that by October 20, there would be 3,000 total cases in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. As of October 7, the count was 8,376.

Given that this is in the neoconservative magazine Weekly Standard I doubt if Mr. Klain has read it, but perhaps someone on his staff with access to the Czar will encounter it. The rest of the article is worth your time. Five of the 58 medical professionals involved in the Science Magazine study died of Ebola before the paper was published.

U.S. Soldiers Get Just Four Hours of Ebola Training
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/10/17/u-s-soldiers-get-just-four-hours-of-ebola-training.html

As the U.S. military rushes to combat Ebola in West Africa, soldiers are receiving on-the-fly instructions on how to protect themselves against the deadly virus.

American military operations to fight Ebola in Africa are unfolding quickly—forcing the military to come up with some procedures and protocols on the fly.

Soldiers preparing for deployment to West Africa are given just four hours of Ebola-related training before leaving to combat the epidemic. And the first 500 soldiers to arrive have been holing up in Liberian hotels and government facilities while the military builds longer-term infrastructure on the ground.

For soldiers at Fort Campbell and Fort Bragg preparing for their deployments to West Africa, Mobile Training Teams from the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), based out of Fort Detrick, have been tasked with instructing them on Ebola protocols.

A team of two can train as many as 50 personnel over that four-hour time frame, USAMRIID told The Daily Beast. The training includes hands-on instruction on how to put on, remove, and decontaminate personal protective equipment, followed by a practical test to ensure that soldiers understand the procedures.

“All training is tiered to the level of risk each person may encounter,” said USAMRIID spokeswoman Caree Vander Linden.

The training process sounds daunting: One USA Today report described soldiers being told that Ebola “basically causes your body to eat itself from the inside out” and that Ebola is “worse” than what soldiers encountered in Afghanistan. Others reportedly heard that the disease is “catastrophic” and “frightening… with a high fatality rate,” though the chances of contracting it are low.

“I’ll be honest with you,” one soldier told the newspaper. “I’m kind of scared.” [emphasis added]

* – * – *

Soldiers based in Liberia have their temperature measured several times per day, and are not permitted to shake hands.

The military maintains that American service members have only limited interactions with locals on the ground. But some American soldiers are working with the Armed Forces of Liberia on a day-to-day basis, and others are training health-care providers on how to combat the virus.

Further, the military acknowledges that it is currently sharing hotels and businesses with foreign nationals.

"We are here with the permission of the Liberian government and we do not clear out local hotels and businesses during our stay," said an Army spokesman. "We chose hotels with the safety of our service members in mind, and the hotel staffs monitor all employees and guests and allow us to conduct safety inspections of their facilities to ensure they meet our safety criteria."

Instead, the military spokesman focused on the precautions that they are already taking: Soldiers based in Liberia have their temperature measured several times per day, and are not permitted to shake hands. They are also are required to frequently wash their hands with a chlorine solution. Some locations even employ chlorine mats that service members are required to wipe their feet on in order to enter.

“The facilities that we’re in have been vetted by our doctors. [They] have gone through the facilities to make sure that they’re safe for our soldiers,” Army spokesman Lt. Col. Michael Indovina said. “We’re very confident. We’ve had very good luck from the time when we’ve arrived on the ground.”

Congress has been slow to give the green light to funding for military operations combating Ebola in Africa, in large part due to initial skepticism over whether there was a sufficient plan for protecting American service members in Liberia.

In mid-September, the Obama administration submitted a $1 billion request for Ebola funding. The request was for a movement of leftover funds from an overseas war spending account, requiring a sign-off from several key congressional figures.

When the Obama administration briefed staffers of the Senate Armed Services Committee on Sept. 19, it was criticized for not adequately explaining what steps the military would take to ensure soldiers’ health.

“If they had bio-security procedures in place, they weren’t adequately articulating them to Congress,” said an aide to Sen. Jim Inhofe, the top-ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee. “When they first came over, they were not able to answer a lot of questions about what procedures were in place.”

Of course it was not long ago that high government officials assured us that any decent hospital in the United States would be able to care for Ebola patients. Yesterday Nina Pham, the first American known to have contracted Ebola in the United States, was taken out of her hospital where, as a nurse, she contracted Ebola, and was sent to Bethesda. Her condition, previously reported to be “good” has now been downgraded to “fair”. Unlike typhus and cholera, Ebola basically turns internal organs to liquid and expels them through diarrhea. There is no known treatment, although there is empirical evidence that the plasma of Ebola survivors can be effective. Experimental drugs but not plasma was given to Mr. Duncan, from whom Ms. Pham contracted Ebola; he subsequently died.
 
Canada's role...

Reuters

Canada to ship experimental Ebola vaccine to WHO in Geneva
Sat Oct 18, 2014 2:02pm EDT

TORONTO (Reuters) - The Canadian government will ship 800 vials of its experimental Ebola vaccine to the World Health Organization in Geneva beginning on Monday, the Public Health Agency of Canada said on Saturday.

The WHO, in consultation with health authorities in the countries most affected by the outbreak of the disease, will decide on how the vaccine will be distributed and used, the agency said in a statement.

The vaccine is undergoing clinical trials on humans at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in the United States after showing promising results in animal testing, it said.

(...SNIPPED)
 
And, it would seem the outbreak can be contained if proper measures, even in a developping country, are implemented.  All without shutting borders.

Nigeria and Senegal are Ebola free, 48 people that had contact with the US case (the one that died) have been cleared.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/20/health/ebola-outbreak-roundup/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

The problem lies with countries like Liberia and Sierra Leone where superstition, distrust and overall crappy conditions have led to a massive outbreak.  The US and Canada (two countries that are light years ahead of Nigeria and Senegal's health care systems) may see a few isolated cases but will not see the same levels.

More people will die from the flu, so get your shot, stay calm and carry on.
 
Colin P said:
I hope I am wrong to worry as much as I do and you are right.

And I hope I am not proven wrong.  Worry and concern is good.  How we manage that is another thing.

Sadly, especially in the U.S. and to a lesser extent here, there is a certain segment that is reactionary in the extreme fueled by fear and misinformation.  The media and especially personalities make it worse.  Dr. Oz (dear God) is likely the only source of information on this for some people.  when we start seeing articlres on how this might become airborne or might spread like wild fire, it certainly does cause worry.  Tea party types  and republicans like Rick Perry aren't helping.

I heard a good explanations that there is a cost for ebola and there is also a cost for the fear of ebola.
 
This article again by CNN explains the hysteria behind "Fear-Bola".

Crazy actually.  Ironically CNN is partially to blame for creating the hysteria to begin with...

http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/20/health/ebola-overreaction/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
 
Chief Stoker said:
They had a trip planned to go to Mount Kilimanjaro for some time. They thought it would ok since there had been no cases in that part of Africa. Military said no.

I was going to call BS on this given that

A) No cases reported, and

B) Tanzania is 3000 freakin miles from the areas hit. 

The reason they were probably denied is the sectarian violence and high risk of terrorism as per the DFAIT travel advisory web page.
 
Meanwhile, this kind of thing isn't helping:
Dr. Cyril Broderick, A Liberian scientist and a former professor of Plant Pathology at the University of Liberia’s College of Agriculture and Forestry says the West, particularly the U.S. is responsible for the Ebola outbreak in West Africa. Dr. Broderick claims the following in an exclusive article published in the Daily Observer based in Monrovia, Liberia ....
And the response of the university where the good Dr. Broderick works now?
Delaware State University said it won’t interfere with the free speech rights of a tenured professor who wrote a wildly speculative and conspiratorial article in a Liberian newspaper in which he claimed that the U.S. government manufactured the Ebola virus and spread it in West Africa under the guise of vaccine testing.

“The university is not going to abridge his First Amendment rights to give his opinion about the issues of the day,” said Carlos Holmes, a spokesman for the school, where Cyril Broderick is an associate professor in the agriculture and natural resources department.

(....)

He declined to comment on whether the university had spoken to Broderick, citing a policy of keeping “personnel issues” private.

“A lot of people can have tenure at a university and then they’ll go out and commit mass murder, okay,” Holmes said. “We didn’t know that they would do that before they were granted tenure.

“You’re talking about something that is happening first of all after he has been granted tenure.”

He added that the comments have nothing to do with the university ....
 
Crantor said:
And I hope I am not proven wrong.  Worry and concern is good.  How we manage that is another thing.

Sadly, especially in the U.S. and to a lesser extent here, there is a certain segment that is reactionary in the extreme fueled by fear and misinformation.  The media and especially personalities make it worse.  Dr. Oz (dear God) is likely the only source of information on this for some people.  when we start seeing articlres on how this might become airborne or might spread like wild fire, it certainly does cause worry.  Tea party types  and republicans like Rick Perry aren't helping.

I heard a good explanations that there is a cost for ebola and there is also a cost for the fear of ebola.
This is an election year, showing your current party is hopeless to stop a epidemic that is ravaging another part of the globe is to good to pass up, they do the same up here as well. having CDC doing the clown college and "medical professionals" totally drop the ball feeds the worry. Americans have a culture of distrust in government, which not all that unjustified.
You notice that Harper is using this crisis to good effect, trying to show that his government is serious about the threat helping abroad and preparing here at home. Plays well I suspect. 
 
More US troops to arrive in Liberia to reinforce those reported earlier in the Africa crisis thread:

Military.com

More US Troops Arriving in West Africa for Ebola Fight

| Oct 21, 2014 | by Chris Carroll
WASHINGTON — More U.S. troops are arriving in West Africa to help fight an Ebola outbreak that has claimed more than 4,500 lives, but the rainy season is causing a delay, the Pentagon announced Monday.

Slightly more than 500 servicemembers are now in Liberia to build treatment centers and provide logistical support. Another 115 are in Dakar, Senegal, at an “air bridge” transportation hub to support the mission, Pentagon spokesman Col. Steve Warren told reporters.

About 80 more troops will arrive by Wednesday, he said, and thousands of soldiers are scheduled to deploy to the country in the coming weeks
. Officials say military personnel will not be assigned to patient treatment, and have repeatedly said there is little risk of infection.

(...SNIPPED)
 
Nigeria apparently defeated Ebola with good old fashioned epedimiology work (thousands of man hours tracking down contacts of victims and suspected victims, for example). OTOH, Liberia looks to be falling even further behind as they have not done the work to identify and report victims and contacts of the disease. The attitudes of Westerners operating there is incomprehensible as well:

http://www.the-american-interest.com/blog/2014/10/19/ebola-out-of-control/

REPORT FROM LIBERIA
Ebola Out of Control
A window into Liberia in the throes of the plague: Westerners boogie the night away in dance halls, sleep with local prostitutes even as authorities downplay the size of the epidemic. Families hide the truth about what’s wrong with their loved ones, fearing consequences of letting authorities and neighbors know the truth. That’s according to this terrifying account provided by the Guardian:

[Sorious] Samura, a television journalist originally from Sierra Leone, said the Liberian authorities appeared to be deliberately downplaying the true number of cases, for fear of increasing alarm in the west African country.

“People are dying in greater numbers than we know, according to MSF [Médecins sans Frontières] and WHO officials. Certain departments are refusing to give them the figures – because the lower it is, the more peace of mind they can give people. The truth is that it is still not under control.” [...]

Samura believes sexual promiscuity among westerners could play a role in the virus’s spread abroad. Almost immediately after the outbreak was reported in March, Liberia’s health minister warned people to stop having sex because the virus was spread via bodily fluids as well as kissing.“I saw westerners in nightclubs, on beaches, guys picking up prostitutes,” he said. “Westerners who ought to know better are going to nightclubs and partying and dancing. It beggars belief. It’s scary.”

If true, Ebola may not come to the West via Liberian or other West African citizens, but from returning aid workers, tourists, business people and others.

One possibility: Many businessmen in West Africa are of Lebanese and Syrian extraction. Put the Ebola virus into a combat zone where medical services are already overwhelmed, and the consequences in refugee camps and cities under siege don’t bear thinking about.

It’s much too soon to tell what the course of the Ebola epidemic will be, but so far it has to be said that Ebola has been easier to catch and harder to contain than officials everywhere have anticipated.

Appearing in West Africa, a part of the world where governments are weak, public health services poor, and local customs and beliefs conducive to its spread deeply entrenched, Ebola could not have found a more promising venue.

The initial U.S. response to the presence of one case has been shambolic; clearly the “long peace” in which killer epidemics were rare has left our health system unprepared for the kind of threat Ebola represents.

We have to hope now that public health authorities here, in Europe and in other countries will demonstrate the focused dedication needed for an extended period in which the threat of a global outbreak of Ebola is real. But even under the best case scenarios, it will take months before the disease is under control and during all that time the epidemic will be knocking on our door, and on the doors of many other countries around the world.

There is some hope that Ebola will have a harder time spreading outside of West Africa if only because public health systems are better elsewhere and burial customs are different. We are not yet facing a killer pandemic worldwide.
 
And the not too surprising and troublong reason that the response in the United States is so confused is the politicisation of formerly "professional" bureaucracies like the CDC. The profile of the current CDC director is quite troubling, especially since his record prior to becoming the director should have raised alarm bells:

http://www.city-journal.org/2014/eon1020sm.html#.VEW5RvvCKrs.twitter

The CDC’s Dr. Talk Good

The Obama administration got exactly what it bargained for with Tom Frieden.

20 October 2014

Just months after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center, Dr. Thomas Frieden arrived in New York from India, where he was helping to fight tuberculosis, to interview for the job of New York City health commissioner. When asked what his top priority would be if he got the job, Frieden startled interviewers by proclaiming, “Tobacco.” With fears widespread about America’s vulnerability to biological terrorism—especially in the aftermath of the anthrax letters, which killed five people not long after 9/11—one interviewee asked: “Tom, have you heard of 9/11?” Frieden answered: “Bioterrorists are not going to kill more New Yorkers than tobacco is.”

Frieden was right, more than a decade ago, that the effects of smoking killed far more people than bio-terrorism (or Ebola, for that matter). But his response was troubling nonetheless because of the way Frieden conflated use of tobacco—a legal substance whose ill effects are well known to those who choose to use it—with the death that terrorists (or highly infectious diseases) might rain down on innocent people. Frieden’s retort said much about the evolution of public-health medicine over the decades into a field more concerned with the choices people make than with the scourge of infectious diseases. His answer also helped clarify how Frieden himself would eventually operate as New York City health commissioner. His tenure was marked by a series of health crusades aimed at so-called “lifestyle diseases” based on dubious evidence.

Frieden is now perhaps the most visible example of the transformation of the field of public health—for better or for worse. Until recently, that arena owed a great debt to the English epidemiologist John Snow, who correctly deduced that the London cholera epidemic of 1854 was caused by contaminated water from the Broad Street pump. Shutting down the pump not only stemmed the tide of the epidemic, but also convinced public officials to undertake construction of sewage and clean-water systems that would effectively end the spread of water-borne epidemics. Encouraged by a series of discoveries of the germ basis of many devastating diseases, researchers in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries made other rapid advancements in public health, including the development of vaccines against some of humanity’s deadliest diseases and techniques such as the pasteurization of milk to stem bacterial contaminations. Through these advances, industrialized nations like the United States have completely eliminated such once-deadly diseases as smallpox, diphtheria, and polio, vastly cutting childhood mortality rates and increasing lifespans.

But as the impact of communicable diseases has lessened, public-health medicine—which concerns itself with community-wide solutions to health problems—began to look more intensely at treating and preventing conditions that don’t originate with germs. The focus of researchers and doctors turned especially to conditions thought to underlie cardiovascular disease. But unlike battles against germs, isolating the key cause of such problems has proved elusive, because multiple factors—from genetics to diet to personal habits, like smoking—are all potentially contribute.

Advocates like Frieden have plunged ahead anyway, sometimes proposing simplistic solutions to complex problems, often without much data to back up their claims. As New York City’s health commissioner, Frieden engineered a law requiring food chains to post calorie counts on menus, though there was no evidence that the availability of such information has any effect on eating habits. (Comment by me: Actually it isn't calories, but carbohydrates Frieden also led a campaign to cut salt consumption despite studies that had shown, in fact, that some individuals fared poorly on a salt-restricted diet. Frieden’s campaign led one world-renown hypertension expert to proclaim that New York was attempting to engineer a giant uncontrolled experiment. As time passed, Frieden’s practice of recommending sometimes outrageous solutions to health problems based on few facts grew more disconcerting. In 2007, he even proposed a campaign to persuade uncircumcised adult men in New York to get circumcised to reduce their risk to HIV; a study in Africa had concluded that the practice helped lower infections there. But Frieden’s proposal was widely derided and quickly dismissed because of the vast differences between the two populations and the preliminary nature of the research.

Given his specialty in infectious diseases, Frieden would have seemed well- prepared to deal with the swine flu outbreak that hit New York in the spring of 2009. And indeed, in the days after the first reports of actual cases here, Frieden seemed to inspire confidence, at least at the New York Times. In an early profile of Frieden that seemed more like a chapter out of Lives of the Saints, a Times reporter noted the doctor’s “passionate rectitude” and described him as a “boyish figure in the dark suit,” who announced daily updates on the flu “in the meticulous, benevolent tones of the trusted family doctor.” The problem was that at this point, just four days after the first reported local cases, Frieden hadn’t accomplished much beyond reading the daily tally.

The situation quickly spun out of control. The city kept open schools where students had contracted the swine flu, and it spread rapidly among kids and staff. One victim, a 55-year-old assistant principal at a hard-hit Queens school, slipped into critical condition and died in mid-May. The victim’s wife criticized the city for underestimating the severity of the outbreak, and some of the school’s staffers told the press that they had pushed the city to close it for a week. But “nobody listened. We had kids dropping like flies,” a school official told the New York Post. Even the Times weighted in with the troubling headline, NO GUIDANCE ON HOW TO REIN IN THE FLU. City officials defended their decisions, saying that they had deferred to the CDC’s guidelines on when to close a school after an outbreak, but Mayor Bloomberg told the Times, “There’s no right answer.” In an accompanying story, the Times said that the outbreak tested “Bloomberg’s political skills” but said nothing about the role of the point man on the issue, the health commissioner it had so effusively praised a few weeks earlier. The city eventually estimated that somewhere between 750,000 and 1 million New Yorkers caught the swine flu; 54 people died from it.

Meantime, however, President Obama had already selected Frieden to run the CDC, though he had yet to depart New York. Nothing about his handling of the swine flu epidemic kept him from getting the federal job. A Times story on the appointment quoted a public-health expert calling Frieden a “transformational” figure, a clear reference to his crusades in Gotham. Frieden had been a leading candidate for the CDC job, in part because his agenda seemed to dovetail with the Obama administration’s notions of where public health should go, as reflected by Michelle Obama’s controversial efforts to reshape school lunch programs. The day after Frieden’s appointment, newspapers in New York featured headlines like OUTRAGE OVER RESPONSE TO FLU. Yet no one in Washington seemed troubled.

One of Frieden’s tasks at the CDC was the reorganization and revitalization of the agency. (Stories had characterized it as demoralized, thanks to supposedly unpopular appointments made during the Bush years.) But under Frieden’s leadership, the CDC has underestimated the Ebola virus’s ability to infect those who come in contact with it and ineffectively communicated to health-care workers the proper protocols for dealing with sick patients. The agency told Amber Vinson, a Dallas nurse who had cared for Ebola patient Thomas Duncan, that it was okay to board a plane with a low-grade fever; Frieden later said that Vinson, who is now being treated for Ebola, never should have done so. When President Obama told Africans in a video message that they couldn’t get Ebola from sitting next to someone on a bus, Frieden was asked to clarify. His response only confused matters further: “If you’re a member of the traveling public and are healthy, should you be worried that you might have gotten it by sitting next to someone? And the answer is no. Second, if you are sick and you may have Ebola, should you get on a bus? And the answer to that is also no. You might become ill, you might have a problem that exposes someone around you.” Under fire, President Obama has appointed an “Ebola czar” to coordinate the government’s response: Ron Klain, a lawyer and political operative with zero experience in infectious diseases.

The mainstream press has seemed mystified by Frieden’s performance. In large part that’s because of the Times-supported fiction that Frieden led an effective campaign against the swine flu in New York. In August, NBC News even described Frieden as “the face of the American public health system . . . trying to calm nerves . . . doing it with the cold, procedural focus of a scientific investigator.” But the truth is that by appointing Frieden, the Obama administration got exactly what it wanted, and there’s nothing baffling about his failures.

Steven Malanga is the senior editor of City Journal and a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute. His latest book is Shakedown: The Continuing Conspiracy Against the American Taxpayer.
 
Back
Top