www.forbes.com
And he may not be able to work for a bit.Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov is upset about Tucker’s firing. For some reason.
Tucker Carlson’s Ouster From Fox Criticized By Russia’s Foreign Minister As ‘Curious News’
Russia’s top diplomat said Carlson’s departure from Fox means the “wealth of views in the American information space has suffered.”
Yes they would. A lot of this depends on the terms of the contract. Employment law in the US runs a bit different from here (constructive dismissal v constructive discharge) but conceivably, with the right terms in place, if they continued to pay him he might be bound not to work elsewhere even for free for the rest of his contract term. If he did he could be in breach of his contract and forfeit future payments.
I cannot possibly see why he would be angry.Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov is upset about Tucker’s firing. For some reason.
Tucker Carlson’s Ouster From Fox Criticized By Russia’s Foreign Minister As ‘Curious News’
Russia’s top diplomat said Carlson’s departure from Fox means the “wealth of views in the American information space has suffered.”
Correct but it means he isn’t dragging his audience with him and will be silent during the campaign
Sure. Russia's lost effective use of a good asset (I don't know if witting or unwitting, but I'm not about to credit Tucker Carlson with an abundance of wits) for a while.I cannot possibly see why he would be angry.
State to State employment law varies significantly.
I suspect Fox could easily get out of the contract, should they chose. The interesting question to me is why aren’t they (if they haven’t actually done so and we just don’t know.) If he’s still on payroll, I’m not sure their motives are.(constructive dismissal v constructive discharge) but conceivably, with the right terms in place, if they continued to pay him he might be bound not to work elsewhere even for free for the rest of his contract term. If he did he could be in breach of his contract and forfeit future payments.
Usually an employer will settle for a lump sum to get rid of the relationship. Here there might be alternate motives at play. Time will tell.
I watched his first public appearance since his firing. He gave no indication he would be silent. It was more of a 'Stand by, things will get interesting'
Yeah. I’m sure it will get messy.
I’m pretty sure I never said anything of the sort.
No, not putting that on you. I was just trying to keep everything in one post. I should have been more specific.
Except all those Americans that made him Number One
Don't know who that is is. Assuming Lemon but I don't watch CNNYou mean this guy ?
What is good about the timing is that Lemon's lamentations and blame will never be heard, being drowned out by the Fox debacle. No one will hear the wimpers as he fades into obscurity. I doubt that millions are even aware he's gone.You mean this guy ?
I didn’t say ‘plant’ either. The term I used was ‘asset’, and I made it pretty clear that I believe he filled that role unwittingly.
I'll afford you this one last reply. In our last exchange you intimated that I'd be taking my ball and leaving this thread. That was not true. I meant you and I were done here, in this thread. Nowhere else, but here. We've had no problem communicating with each other anywhere else, on many different topics. We are at odds here. We know where we both stand and sometimes get too vehement about it. I'd rather just avoid the conflict where nothing is going to change our minds anyway.
