• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Reports say Chinese-made weapons used by Taliban

retiredgrunt45 said:
Sorry Infadel, but it doesn't matter when you sold the weapons. Its like you sold a gun to a person down the street, 2 years later that person sells that gun another person, this second buyer uses that same gun to kill 2 kids on the block. Are you going to say, hell times were different back then, when I sold the gun to the first buyer?

It's no different when nations sell weapons, there is always a chance, down the road, that those very same weapons will find there way into and enemies hands and be used against you, who sold them to the person, who then sold them to your enemy.

Anytime weapons are sold to whoever the seller always stands the chance of being the victim to those very same weapons at any time in the future. History has proven that time and again.

::)
Yeah and Germany was out Enemy in WWI and WWII -- maybe we should burn them out today - just on the off chance they may do something in the future.

  There is a chance of a lot of things, but by your comments we should stop training the ANA and giving them weapons...  :blotto:
Your missing the other side of the coin.
SO I'm sorry your comment is RTFO.


 
The Chinese arent too happy about their weapons getting into the hands of the taliban. The weapons were sold to Iran/Pakistan which were then given to the taliban.Samething happened to us in Iraq.Iran bought Austrian sniper rifles which then were given to the insurgency.
 
The Chinese aren't too happy about their weapons getting into the hands of the taliban. The weapons were sold to Iran/Pakistan which were then given to the taliban.Samething happened to us in Iraq.Iran bought Austrian sniper rifles which then were given to the insurgency.

My point exactly.

Sorry Infadel, but you have to get your head out of the sand. This happens all the time. As for your comment on Germany I think after been defeated in two world wars they know better.

I think your RTFO if you think it doesn't happen. Happens all the time. And if you think it doesn't, educate yourself, you'll be surprised what you find. And no I'm not saying stop training the ANA, you did. What I'am saying is yes there is always a chance those very same weapons will be used against us some day, if you think otherwise, then keep those blinders on.

Your profile says your in Iraq, then you should know better than any of us that it does happen.

Enlighten yourself. http://samvak.tripod.com/brief-arms01.html This is just one example.



 
Reading is fundemental,not only is it Infidel, but I also point out life sucks wear a helmet...
  I am very aware that there is indeed a chance that we are arming people that could come back to bite us.  However we are given a choice of accepting that possibility, or not helping them defeat the insurgents.

Your the one living in a rose coloured sky, I am in fact on the ground in Iraq - so I live the the choices others hypothsize about.

 
E.R. Campbell said:
But we've participated in Olympics in the USA, Russia and France - all of whom export more weapons to equally (or even more) unsavoury regimes.  Why is China different?  Canada sells arms to less than squeaky clean countries, ditto Australia.  Arms are products - generally the 'finished' product with 'embedded' technologies and assemblies from a dozen different suppliers/countries, including goody-two-shoes Canada and Australia.

Oh hypocrisy! Thy name is nationalism.
Which weapons? Who? What do you mean less than squeaky clean? Not saying your wrong but I thought we were careful. If we sell weapons to thugs, why haven't I heard of this from the NDP and the other anticapitalist wingnuts. Granted, I don't read the papers anymore, but I should be able to hear them screaming from here. I think also we should distinguish between hypocrisy and SNAFU.
 
tomahawk6 said:
The Chinese arent too happy about their weapons getting into the hands of the taliban. The weapons were sold to Iran/Pakistan which were then given to the taliban.

At least lately, anyway...

Afghanistan: U.S. Worried Iran Sending Chinese Weapons To Taliban
Ron Synovitz, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 14 Sept 07
Article link

U.S. Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte says Washington has complained to Beijing about Chinese weapons shipments to Iran that appear to be turning up in the hands of Taliban fighters in Afghanistan.

Negroponte confirmed the U.S. concerns over China's weapons deals with Tehran after a 10-ton weapons cache was discovered in the western Afghan province of Herat.

The cache found in Ghurian district, near the border with Iran, included artillery shells, land mines, and rocket-propelled grenade launchers with Chinese, Russian, and Persian markings on them.

Britain's Foreign Office has also confirmed that it has complained to Beijing about Chinese-made HN-5 antiaircraft missiles confiscated from Taliban fighters who were captured or killed by British Royal Marines in Helmand Province. Beijing has said that it would investigate allegations that the weapons were forwarded to the Taliban through Iran.

When asked in Kabul on September 11 about the Taliban's use of sophisticated new Chinese weapons, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte also suggested that Iran has been a transit point for Chinese arms deliveries to the Taliban.

"A subject that I have discussed with the Chinese in the past is the fact of their weapons sales to the country of Iran and our concern," Negroponte said. "We have tried to discourage the Chinese from signing any new weapons contracts with Iran. We are concerned by reports -- which we consider to be reliable -- of explosively formed projectiles and other kinds of military equipment coming from Iran across the border and coming into the hands of the Taliban."

In June, U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said Washington had no evidence proving a direct role by the Iranian government in smuggling weapons to the Taliban. But Gates said Washington suspects Tehran is involved.

"I haven't seen any intelligence specifically to this effect, but I would say, given the quantities we are seeing, it is difficult to believe that it is associated with smuggling or the drug business or that it is taking place without the knowledge of the Iranian government," Gates said.

Not Without Tehran's Knowledge?

Alex Vatanka is the Washington-based Iran analyst for Jane's Information Group, which publishes "Jane's Defence Weekly" and other journals about the weapons industry and global security issues. Vatanka says it will remain unclear whether the Ghurian weapons cache is linked to the Taliban until Afghan or U.S. authorities announce details of their joint investigation.

But the presence of Chinese weapons so close to the Iranian border is the strongest evidence to date suggesting Tehran has had at least an indirect role in arms shipments to Afghanistan, Vatanka said. "Whether the government or somebody in Iran could be buying arms from China and, without Tehran's knowledge, ship it over to Afghanistan -- on that volume of weapons -- I find that extremely unlikely," he said. "I can only see that happening if somebody pretty senior and in an influential political position in Iran decided to facilitate that without letting everybody in the system know about it. But they still had to be involved somewhere in the state machinery. We're not talking about rogue elements [in Iran]. Baluchi drug traffickers can't pull that kind of thing off."

Many analysts have noted that Shi'ite Iran and the Sunni Taliban had been firm enemies since 1998, when the Taliban regime controlled most of Afghanistan and executed nine Iranian diplomats in Mazar-e Sharif.

But Pakistani journalist Ahmed Rashid, an expert on Islamic militancy in the region and author of the book "Taliban," told RFE/RL that times appear to have changed. Now, with U.S. forces deployed some 60 kilometers from the Iranian border at Shindad Airfield in Herat Province, Rashid says Tehran and the Taliban have a common enemy.

"I have no doubt that Iran has been involved in channeling money and arms to various elements in Afghanistan, including the Taliban, for the last few years. They have long-running relations with many of the commanders and small-time warlords in western Afghanistan," Rashid said. He continued: "I think Iran is playing all sides in the Afghan conflict. And there are Pashtuns and non-Pashtuns who are being funded by Iran who are active in western Afghanistan. If the Iranians are convinced that the Americans are undermining them through western Afghanistan, then it is very likely that these agents of theirs have been activated."

Political Backlash

Still, Vatanka says it would be "almost irrational behavior" for Tehran to supply the Taliban with weapons. He says such a move would almost certainly lead to a negative domestic political backlash for Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad's government.

For that reason, Vatanka says he is eagerly awaiting the assessment of Afghan and U.S. investigators about whether the arms in the Ghurian cache were stashed away by the Taliban or by one of several rival militia factions in Herat Province.

"The question is, what would get even a faction within Iran to make that type of a decision? Maybe you have excellent business ties between the Iranians and the Afghans on the other side -- not necesarily the central government in Kabul -- but local leaders in Herat who turn around saying, 'You Iranians are building roads and infrastructure here. You are setting up shops and factories. But for us to be able to guarantee that we can protect your business interests, we'll need to receive some arms.' That's an argument that one could put out: that the Iranians are essentially supplying not the Taliban, but Afghan partners to secure Iranian businesses and interests in western Afghanistan," Vatanka said.

To date, Afghan President Hamid Karzai has refused to publicly support allegations of a direct link between Tehran and weapons shipments to the Taliban.

"We don't have any such evidence so far of the involvement of the Iranian government in supplying the Taliban. We have a very good relationship with the Iranian government. Iran and Afghanistan have never been as friendly as they are today," Karzai said.

Vatanka says that as long as Karzai maintains that position, skeptics around the world will dismiss suggestions from Washington that Tehran is supplying Taliban fighters in Afghanistan.

"From a U.S. point of view, if the insurgency in Afghanistan is essentially escalating based on Iranian assistance, then what Washington really needs to do is to provide far more evidence that points to that -- and get Mr. Hamid Karzai in Kabul and the regional governments in Afghanistan to back the U.S. up when it makes these claims against Iran," Vatanka said.

After the U.S. military failed to find the weapons of mass destruction allegedly being stockpiled in Iraq, Vatanka said, "the skeptics out there are saying 'These [new allegations] are being made up by the U.S. to justify another war with Iran' -- which might not actually be the case. Iran might be involved. But because of the lack of evidence, the Iranians are saying, 'Who else is backing up the U.S. allegations?'"
 
The only way the Chinese government will react is when there is solid proof that they directly sold said weapons to the Taliban (sails invoice/receipt etc.) 

On an other note, depending on the age of the weapons they maybe are selling, they could be selling said weapons to see how they work in the environment, against our armor etc.  IMO this may be the case, as the Chinese Government may be still be planning something.

If I remember correctly, the Russians have done this in the past.
 
The only way the Chinese government will react is when there is solid proof that they directly sold said weapons to the Taliban (sails invoice/receipt etc.) 

The question is, how would they react?

Some food coming out of China is found to be contaminated.
Just like that, some food imports to China are turned back.
Trade rules don't matter.

Supplying the Taliban is good way to end an R&D cycle.
The downsides for China are minimal.
Iran does "irrational" things anyway.

This is a lose - lose situation for our side I think.
Accusations won't amount to anything.



 
    The bottom line is the bottom line ,China  does not care who buys our uses there weapons . Look at there business dealings in Africa they are apathetic to a governments policies or practises they simply just want there resources . China is definitely raising the bar on immoral foreign policy .
 
Back
Top