• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Canada says it will look at increasing its defence spending and tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever growing sanctions list.

By Tonda MacCharles
Ottawa Bureau
Mon., March 7, 2022

Riga, LATVIA—On the 13th day of the brutal Russian bid to claim Ukraine as its own, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is showing up at the Latvian battle group led by Canadian soldiers, waving the Maple Leaf and a vague hint at more money for the military.

Canada has been waving the NATO flag for nearly seven years in Latvia as a bulwark against Russia’s further incursions in Eastern Europe.

Canada stepped up to lead one of NATO’s four battle groups in 2015 — part of the defensive alliance’s display of strength and solidarity with weaker member states after Russia invaded Ukraine and seized the Crimean peninsula in 2014. Trudeau arrived in the Latvian capital late Monday after meetings in the U.K. with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Netherlands Prime Minister Mark Rutte.

Earlier Monday, faced with a seemingly unstoppable war in Ukraine, Trudeau said he will look at increasing Canada’s defence spending. Given world events, he said there are “certainly reflections to have.”

And Canada tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever-growing sanctions list.

The latest round of sanctions includes names Trudeau said were identified by jailed Russian opposition leader and Putin nemesis Alexei Navalny.

However, on a day when Trudeau cited the new sanctions, and Johnson touted new measures meant to expose Russian property owners in his country, Rutte admitted sanctions are not working.

Yet they all called for more concerted international efforts over the long haul, including more economic measures and more humanitarian aid, with Johnson and Rutte divided over how quickly countries need to get off Russian oil and gas.

The 10 latest names on Canada’s target list do not include Roman Abramovich — a Russian billionaire Navalny has been flagging to Canada since at least 2017. Canada appears to have sanctioned about 20 of the 35 names on Navalny’s list.

The Conservative opposition says the Liberal government is not yet exerting maximum pressure on Putin, and should do more to bolster Canadian Forces, including by finally approving the purchase of fighter jets.

Foreign affairs critic Michael Chong said in an interview that Ottawa must still sanction “additional oligarchs close to President Putin who have significant assets in Canada.”

Abramovich owns more than a quarter of the public shares in steelmaking giant Evraz, which has operations in Alberta and Saskatchewan and has supplied most of the steel for the government-owned Trans Mountain pipeline project.

Evraz’s board of directors also includes two more Russians the U.S. government identified as “oligarchs” in 2019 — Aleksandr Abramov and Aleksandr Frolov — and its Canadian operations have received significant support from the federal government.

That includes at least $27 million in emergency wage subsidies during the pandemic, as well as $7 million through a fund meant to help heavy-polluters reduce emissions that cause climate change, according to the company’s most recent annual report.

In addition to upping defence spending, the Conservatives want NORAD’s early warning system upgraded, naval shipbuilding ramped up and Arctic security bolstered.

In London, Johnson sat down with Trudeau and Rutte at the Northolt airbase. Their morning meetings had a rushed feel, with Johnson starting to usher press out before Trudeau spoke. His office said later that the British PM couldn’t squeeze the full meeting in at 10 Downing Street because Johnson’s “diary” was so busy that day. The three leaders held an afternoon news conference at 10 Downing.

But before that Trudeau met with the Queen, saying she was “insightful” and they had a “useful, for me anyway, conversation about global affairs.”

Trudeau meets with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg Tuesday in Latvia.

The prime minister will also meet with three Baltic leaders, the prime ministers of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, in the Latvian capital of Riga.

The Liberals announced they would increase the 500 Canadian Forces in Latvia by another 460 troops. The Canadians are leading a multinational battle group, one of four that are part of NATO’s deployments in the region.

Another 3,400 Canadians could be deployed to the region in the months to come, on standby for NATO orders.

But Canada’s shipments of lethal aid to Ukraine were slow to come in the view of the Conservatives, and the Ukrainian Canadian community.

And suddenly Western allies are eyeing each other’s defence commitments.

At the Downing Street news conference, Rutte noted the Netherlands will increase its defence budget to close to two per cent of GDP. Germany has led the G7, and doubled its defence budget in the face of Putin’s invasion and threats. Johnson said the U.K. defence spending is about 2.4 per cent and declined to comment on Canada’s defence spending which is 1.4 per cent of GDP.

But Johnson didn’t hold back.

“What we can’t do, post the invasion of Ukraine is assume that we go back to a kind of status quo ante, a kind of new normalization in the way that we did after the … seizure of Crimea and the Donbas area,” Johnson said. “We’ve got to recognize that things have changed and that we need a new focus on security and I think that that is kind of increasingly understood by everybody.”

Trudeau stood by his British and Dutch counterparts and pledged Canada would do more.

He defended his government’s record, saying Ottawa is gradually increasing spending over the next decade by 70 per cent. Then Trudeau admitted more might be necessary.

“We also recognize that context is changing rapidly around the world and we need to make sure that women and men have certainty and our forces have all the equipment necessary to be able to stand strongly as we always have. As members of NATO. We will continue to look at what more we can do.”

The three leaders — Johnson, a conservative and Trudeau and Rutte, progressive liberals — in a joint statement said they “will continue to impose severe costs on Russia.”

Arriving for the news conference from Windsor Castle, Trudeau had to detour to enter Downing Street as loud so-called Freedom Convoy protesters bellowed from outside the gate. They carried signs marked “Tuck Frudeau” and “Free Tamara” (Lich).

Protester Jeff Wyatt who said he has no Canadian ties told the Star he came to stand up for Lich and others who were leading a “peaceful protest” worldwide against government “lies” about COVID-19 and what he called Trudeau’s “tyranny.”

Elsewhere in London, outside the Russian embassy, other protesters and passersby reflected on what they said was real tyranny — the Russian attack on Ukraine. “I think we should be as tough as possible to get this stopped, as tough as possible,” said protester Clive Martinez.
 
Trudeau's not embarrassed.
Unfortunately, there are lots of other Canadians out there that are just as misinformed as he is. From todays Toronto Star:

Cyberattacks. Forest fires. Decaying infrastructure. Maybe Canada has better things to spend money on than G7 and NATO​

NATO missions occur only with U.S. approval and are led by the U.S., writes David Olive. That finds Canadian taxpayers subsidizing America’s military ambitions abroad.

By David Olive Star Business Columnist Tuesday, August 1, 2023

The Wall Street Journal recently devoted an editorial to Canada’s “pathetic” level of defence spending and suggested that we should be booted from the G7 because of it.

Among NATO members, the G7 countries must lead in raising their defence outlays to an amount equal to two per cent of GDP, said the Journal. That target was agreed to by NATO members including Canada in 2014 as an aspirational goal.

Canada’s current defence spending equals 1.38 per cent of GDP.

“And if Canada doesn’t want to play that role,” the Journal said, “then the G7 should consider a replacement. Poland, which now spends 3.9 per cent of GDP on defence, would be a candidate.”

Ideally, that Journal broadside would spur a long-overdue rethink of Canadian foreign and defence policy.

Does Canada even want to remain in the G7 and NATO?

And should we spend less on defence and more on fighting cyberattacks and protecting ourselves from forest fires and other climate crisis harms?

The G7 is an annual summit dating from the 1970s for the leaders of some of the world’s richest jurisdictions — the U.S., Japan, Germany, France, the U.K., Italy and Canada. The head of the European Union (EU) has observer status.


The G7 is just another “talking shop,” like Davos without the celebrities. And the G7, like almost everything of which America is a member, is dominated by the U.S.

In projecting its own values worldwide, Canada would be better served in building up the Commonwealth and La Francophonie, where Canada and other member countries aren’t sidelined by the U.S.

In fact, Canada’s membership in the G7 and NATO invites resentment for the wealth and perceived alignment with the U.S. that each institution represents.

NATO, it should be clear, exists to project American power abroad. Its missions occur only with U.S. approval and are led by the U.S.

That finds Canadian taxpayers subsidizing America’s military ambitions and surrendering some of Canada’s foreign policy sovereignty.

At the dawn of the nuclear era, Canada swore off becoming a nuclear-weapons power. But as a member of NATO, Canada is partnered in a military alliance equipped with thousands of nuclear warheads.

Canada spends a lot of money on defence, more than would be expected of a country with no enemies.

In 2021, Canada spent about $35 billion on defence, ranking sixth among NATO’s 31 members. (Poland spent $17.7 billion that year.)

Canadian defence spending has jumped by 40 per cent since 2014. It will surge by another 46 per cent, to $51 billion per year, by fiscal 2026-27, according to the Parliamentary Budget Office.

As it happens, G7 members Germany and Italy also have not met the two per cent target. (G7 member Japan is not a NATO partner.)

NATO members that meet the two per cent target often have lingering foreign policy interests in former colonies in Africa, the Middle East and Asia Pacific.

Or they are in dangerous neighbourhoods like the Russian frontier (Poland and the Baltic States) and the Balkans (Croatia).

You don’t have to be a pacifist to be skeptical about defence spending.

The capability of the “hard power” represented by costly military hardware and large standing armies has severe limitations.

The French learned that lesson from their military setbacks in Vietnam and Algeria.
And the Americans made a botch of their armed interventions in Southeast Asia, Iraq and Afghanistan.

Meanwhile, NATO’s dubious expansionism, following a spell in which the alliance looked irrelevant in the post-Soviet era, is a primary just cause cited by Russia in its invasion of Ukraine.
With considerable lobbying in Washington and Eastern European capitals by Lockheed Martin Corp. and other large defence contractors, NATO has added 16 new members over the past three decades.

NATO was trying to coax still more former Soviet states, Ukraine and Georgia, into the alliance when Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022.

NATO’s encroachment on Russia does not justify Putin’s atrocities in Ukraine, but the Russian president has been plain-spoken about the NATO-fed paranoia that prompts his war crimes.
NATO and other forms of hard power have not dissuaded North Korea and Iran from nuclear-power ambitions. They have not curbed the proliferation of failed states, Syria, Iraq, Somalia and South Africa, among them.

And hard power hasn’t protected Canada from the daily ransomware attacks, thought to mostly originate in Russia, that routinely disable Canadian hospitals and businesses.

Real threats we have, from cyberattacks; forest fires and other harms caused by climate crisis; an inability to adequately house ourselves; an underfunded health-care system; and an ancient power grid and other aging infrastructure.

Pumping ever more money into defence, as Canada has done — the Journal article notwithstanding — has not made Canadians safer.

We need to reassess what truly threatens us, and then commit our limited resources to better protecting ourselves from those threats. It’s time to stop padding the profits of the military-industrial complex.

David Olive is a Toronto-based business columnist for the Star. Follow him on Twitter: @TheGrtRecession

Link
 
No he is not, and that's the sad part....my grandkids are totally.....Fuc*** because of this country's total fail, to actually give a fuc* about the future including Defense, the US at some point will take Canada's resources, so China doesn't get it! Economy is in the toilet with all the Liberal projects, housing / inflation shitshow, this Current government does not give a shit whatsoever!! How many damn NATO countries have to say we are a freeloader!! We have the resources to unfuck this, but won't happen because Greta Says so!! My 2 cents!
Redistribution of wealth, destruction of natural resource sectors, runaway inflation, loss of the middle class. Demonization of our European heritage. Divisiveness at every turn, attacking and destroying anyone who dares try counter the trudeau narrative. I could go on. I've said from the beginning, he is not here for Canadians or Canada as soveriegn, but to fulfill a globalist agenda of "You will own nothing, and you will be happy." He told us before he was done that he was going to make us the world's first Post National State and everyone laughed. Not laughing now, are they. Out of work, $200 from bankruptcy, living in tents while illegal aliens bring in thousands in benefits and live in 4 star hotels. Many without job, language and education skills. For the life of me, I can't understand how Canadians can be so willfully blind as to what is happening to this country. Like the old adage, they won't care until it comes for them and then it'll be too late. For this guy though, I will not go gentle into this good night.
 
1966 - arrived in Canada - Coke 7 cents
2023 - currently - Coke $2.59 (admittedly the bottle is bigger)

The toonie kind of feels like 2 cents some days.
/entirely off topic post
While younger than you, I can remember in the summer at my parents cottage near Petawawa biking in the 70’s into Killaloe to get a soda, it was $0.10, this summer I drove to Barry’s Bay got a 4 pack of Mexi-Coke (cane sugar as opposed to the crap in normal Canadian and American Coke) for $6.42 Cdn)
Which even before the exchange rate was a little cheaper than one can get Mexi-Coke down here.

Even greater tangent, a BeaverTail this year was ~$6.
 
.25 would buy me a bottle of grape Crush and full size chocolate bar. For pop there was place where we pick up a flat of pop in stubbie bottles and when done return the bottles to the same place, where they were cleaned and refilled.
 
What I find interesting is that bottle deposit on a $0.10 soda was $0.02. 20% of the cost. That period (start of '70s) was also when the run-up in comic book prices started ... $0.12, $0.15, $0.20, $0.25...

Bastards.
 
/entirely off topic post
While younger than you, I can remember in the summer at my parents cottage near Petawawa biking in the 70’s into Killaloe to get a soda, it was $0.10, this summer I drove to Barry’s Bay got a 4 pack of Mexi-Coke (cane sugar as opposed to the crap in normal Canadian and American Coke) for $6.42 Cdn)
Which even before the exchange rate was a little cheaper than one can get Mexi-Coke down here.

Even greater tangent, a BeaverTail this year was ~$6.
Even more off topic, Barry's Bay must have the only Tim Horton's in the world that closes at 3pm.
 
Season 4 Jasper GIF by The Simpsons
 
What I find interesting is that bottle deposit on a $0.10 soda was $0.02. 20% of the cost. That period (start of '70s) was also when the run-up in comic book prices started ... $0.12, $0.15, $0.20, $0.25...

Bastards.
Nothing quite like having one's childhood ruined by inflation...
 
Even more off topic, Barry's Bay must have the only Tim Horton's in the world that closes at 3pm.
They are having major work force issues. They haven’t even opened up the inside space. Everything is still drive through only.
 
Back
Top