- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 410
As an investor, I am concerned about the behavior of the media, since they provide the "facts" which people make decisions on. My clippings files are mostly about economics (as per my outside interests), and it is quite scary to see headlines decrying "Economic Mistakes" or words to that effect, only to backtrack and see very similar economic figures and indicators being touted as "triumphs" of the Clinton Administration.
This naturally tweaks my interest, and so contradictions and misrepresentations about political subjects become more in focus as well since politics can influence the economy. As a BTW, although Wilson made a big deal about there being no evidence for Iraqi attempts to purchase yellowcake, British intellligence has never retracted or recanted from that report which launched the entire affair in the first place, another fact that somehow isn't worth reporting on.....unless of course you want to leave certain impressions in people's minds.
Karl Rove's guide to Clouding the issue", step one: Introduce Irrelevencies.
Back on track,
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/docs/plame.cia.letter.pdf
30 January 2004
The Honorable John Conyers, Jr.
Ranking Democratic Member
Committee on the Judiciary
House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
Dear Mr. Conyers:
Thank you for your letter of 29 September 2003 to the Director of Central intelligence (DCI) regarding any contacts the Central intelligence agency has had with the Department of Justice (DoJ) to request an investigation into the disclosure earlier that year of the identity of an employee operating undercover. The DCI has asked me to respond your letter on his behalf.
Executive order 12333 requires CIA to report to the Attorney General "possible violations of criminal law." In accordance with executive order 12333 on 24 July 2003, a CIA attorney left a phone message for the chief of the counterespionage section of DOJ noting concern with recent articles on this subject and stating that the CIA would forward a written crimes report pending the outcome of a review of the articles by subject matter experts. By letter dated 30 July 2003, the CIA reported to the criminal division of DOJ a possible violation of criminal law concerning the unauthorized disclosure of classified information. The letter also informed, DOJ that the CIA's Office of Security had opened an investigation into this matter. This letter was sent again to DOJ by facsimile on 5 September 2003.
By letter dated 16 September 2003, and in accordance with standard practice in such matters, the CIA informed DOJ that the Agency's investigation into this matter was complete, provided DOJ a memorandum setting forth the results of that investigation, and requested that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) undertake a criminal investigation of this matter. In a 29 September 2 003 letter, DOJ advised that the Counterespionage Section of DOJ had requested that the FBI initiate an investigation of this matter.
Stanley M. Moskowitz
Director of Congressional Affairs
Damn that liberal dominated CIA eh? Now feel free to correct me if I am misunderstanding all the legalese, but it seems pretty clear that the CIA did consider Plame to be an undercover operative. Would this constitude "do nothing but a bit of CYA" as our dear a_majoor claims? I don't know, since I've no knowledge of what the usual proceedure would be.