• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Syria Superthread [merged]

Flanker jets join the Russian presence in Syria:

CNN

Russia sends fighter jets to Syria after talks with U.S.

By Jamie Crawford and Barbara Starr, CNN
Updated 6:21 PM ET, Fri September 18, 2015

Washington (CNN)Defense Secretary Ashton Carter spoke with his Russian counterpart Friday as Russian military moves inside Syria continued to escalate with the arrival of fighter jets.

In a "constructive conversation," both Carter and Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoygu agreed to "further discuss mechanisms for deconfliction in Syria," Pentagon Press Secretary Peter Cook said in a statement, as the United States and its allies continue military operations against ISIS inside Syria.

Shoygu told Carter that the recent Russian military buildup in Syria is "defensive in nature" and aimed at supporting Russian obligations to the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, a senior U.S. Defense official told reporters.

(...SNIPPED)
 
PPCLI Guy said:
This is basically a Game of Empires:  a tussle between the Arabian, Persian and Ottoman Empires for control of the region. 

No need for the Russian, Chinese or American "empires" to get involved, but if one does (such as Russia is clearly doing) I believe that it will ultimately be to their detriment.

I concur that we should back off and let them have at it.

Plus, isn't it time for our once per decade tradition of semi-invading Haiti? Winter is coming ...
 
whiskey601 said:
Plus, isn't it time for our once per decade tradition of semi-invading Haiti? Winter is coming ...

That's all scheduled for next month. In October the mandate for the UN mission is up for renewal and Haiti also has the the first round of their presidential elections. Plus, it's hurricane season. Should be a fun month.
 
The RCN doesn't have any ships left. Guess the Chinooks will have to self deploy from Pet, and marry up with DART and the C17s/C130Js In Florida.

Biggest lesson learned from last time? Chain saws are crappy at sawing down coconut trees. The fibre just clogs the chain. Which makes extending runways a slow process....
 
I wonder how long they can sustain this presence considering Russia's recent economic woes:

Reuters

Russian aircraft in Syria consistent with 'force protection': Kerry
Tue Sep 22, 2015 5:09pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. military has assessed that the type of Russian aircraft in Syria is consistent with protecting their own forces, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said on Tuesday and called on Russia and Iran to be helpful in ending the four-year conflict.

"For the moment it is the judgment of our military and experts that the level and type represents basically force protection," Kerry told reporters.

However, depending on Russia's long-term decisions, the presence of Russian aircraft in Syria could raise some questions about Moscow's intentions, he added.

(...SNIPPED)
 
The Economist newspaper offers two reasons for Russia stepping up its support to Syria:

    1. "... over the summer it genuinely started to look as though Mr Assad was losing. IS, as well as other less extreme opposition groups, have been pushing back the border of the small statelet he still controls (small geographically,
        that is: it still comprises the bulk of Syria’s dwindling population.) Fear of a collapse, or a coup, that might in the worst case deprive Russia of its naval base at Tartus, the only military facility Russia still controls outside the
        former Soviet Union, will have been genuine;"
and/or

    2. "Vladimir Putin is provisionally expected in New York next week at the United Nations General Assembly, the first time he has attended for a decade. He is also hoping for a one-to-one meeting with Barack Obama. It is important
        to both his domestic and his foreign audience to be able to show two things. The first is that Russia opposes regime change and will defend its allies. Mr Assad may, eventually, be eased out as part of a deal in which Russia will be a
        key broker, but it wants to be able to make that deal, which could well be discussed in New York, from a position of strength, not weakness. The second is to signal that Russia is a vital partner for America in the fight against IS and
        jihadist terror in general, which Russia has even more reason than America to fear. Such a coalition underlines Russia’s continuing status as a great power, and helps bring it back in from the cold, ending the long stand-off between
        Russia and America over Ukraine."


I think there's a third reason. I believe that Russia/Putin is following the Chinese model and meddling in almost anything that will likely create diplomatic/strategic problems for the USA at a low risk/low cost to China. I think Putin is "upping the ante" a bit more than a Chinese leader would, but I suspect it's the same tactic at work.
 
Not sure whether to believe this, considering the source. However, Chinese warships have been to Yemen to evacuate their nationals before, so it wouldn't be surprising if they are increasing their footprint in the region.

Pravda

Chinese Navy sets off for Syria
25.09.2015 | Source: Pravda.Ru

According to the Russian Senator Igor Morozov, Beijing has taken decision to take part in combating IS and sent its vessels to the Syrian coast.
Igor Morozov, member of the Russian Federation Committee on International Affairs claimed about the beginning of the military operation by China against the IS terrorists. "It is known, that China has joined our military operation in Syria, the Chinese cruiser has already entered the Mediterranean, aircraft carrier follows it," Morozov said.

According to him, Iran may soon join the operation carried out by Russia against the IS terrorists, via Hezbollah. Thus, the Russian coalition in the region gains ground, and most reasonable step of the US would be to join it.

(...SNIPPED)
 
Well, let's start with the little fact that the P.L.A.N. does not have any cruisers. That kind of eliminates that part. Secondly, the Liaoning is nowhere near ready to operate out of home waters and in more than experimental/gain experience mode.

Moreover, the Chinese observed method of operation would suggest that, when the Liaoning is ready for operations, it will follow the American practice of deploying as a battle group. I think that the Russian senator would have known that and it is much more impressive to say the a Chinese Carrier battle group will follow shortly.

If a large Chinese ship has entered the Med. and if the idea here is to provide succour to Chinese citizens for evacuation, it is likely a Type 071 amphibious transport dock of the Yuzhao class.
 
One of the fairly constant aims of Chinese foreign policy is to discomfit others, especially, right now, the Americans.

I'm pretty sure the Chinese announced this move several months ago ... it was discussed here on Army.ca, if I remember correctly.

The Chinese are, I think, helping the Russians because the Russians are making life more complicated fore the Americans ... not because the Chinese like the Russians. If anything, in my opinion, the Chinese, including official China in the Zhongnanhai, right next to the Forbidden City, dislikes Russia more than it dislikes America. My sense is that the Chinese people hold considerable respect and affection for America but the same is not true for Russia. But, as a matter of policy, if something can be done, relatively cheaply and very safely, to make things more difficult for the USA then the Chinese will give it a try.

The USA is "top dog;" China is number two, but, like Avis of old, it tries harder.

         
avis420.png

 
China and rental cars aside, more western nations are slowly joining the air campaign over Syria: the latest being France.

French forces have just begun air strikes against ISIS in Syria. Only-land-based Rafales were involved in this strike though. No word on whether their lone carrier group is in the region.

Aviationist

Five Rafales, one Atlantique 2 and one C-135 involved in France’s air strike in Syria
Sep 27 2015

By David Cenciotti
The French contingent has struck IS positions in Syria earlier today.
On Sept. 27, five Rafale jets, an Atlantique 2 and a C-135 tanker aircraft “launched by airbases located in Jordan and the Persian Gulf,” were involved in the first mission against an ISIS training camp in Syria as part of Operation Chammal.

Launched on Sept. 19, 2014, Chammal has seen a contingent counting now 12 tactical jets (six Rafale, three Mirage 2000D and three Mirage 2000N aircraft) and one Atlantique 2 MPA (Maritime Patrol Aircraft) take part in the air strikes (bombing targets and flying reconnaissance missions) against Islamic State positions in Iraq.

The first air strike in Syria was preceded by 12 ISR (Intelligence Surveillance Reconnaissance) missions conducted from Sept. 8 to 24, that helped to identify targets of interest located in the regions controlled by the terrorist organization: a “self-assessment” capacity, as the French MoD dubbed it in an official statement released after the mission.

(...SNIPPED)
 
Putin's forces officially begin launching strikes against ISIS in Syria:

Defense News

U.S. official: Russia launches first Syria airstrike
Jim Michaels and Jane Onyanga-Omara 9:49 a.m. EDT September 30, 2015

Russia launched its first airstrike in Syria following a build up of its forces in the embattled country, a U.S. official said Wednesday.

The airstrike was conducted around the city of Homs, said the official, who asked not to be identified because he was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.

The United States was given one hour's notice before the strike took place, the official said. The notice was sent in Baghdad, where the Russians have set up a coordination unit with Iraq’s government. A high-ranking Russian officer there notified a U.S. military official at the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, the U.S. official said.

(...SNIPPED)
 
Further:

Apparently. the Russians gave the US one hours notice! The US government & military caught flat footed.

Does anyone believe anything Pres Obama or Kerry says?

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/09/30/boots-on-ground-russian-lawmakers-back-putin-sending-troops-to-syria/

Russia launches airstrikes in northern Syria, senior military official says


By Jennifer Griffin and Lucas TomlinsonPublished September 30, 2015FoxNews.com

Russian warplanes began bombarding Syrian opposition targets in the war-torn nation's north Wednesday, following a terse meeting at which a Russian general asked Pentagon officials to clear out of Syrian air space and was rebuffed, Fox News has learned.

A U.S. official said Russian airstrikes targeted fighters in the vicinity of Homs, located roughly 60 miles east of a Russian naval facility in Tartus, and were carried out by a "couple" of Russian bombers. The strikes hit targets in Homs and Hama, but there is no presence of ISIS in those areas, a senior U.S. defense official said. These planes are hitting areas where Free Syrian Army and other anti-Assad groups are located, the official said.

Activists and a rebel commander on the ground said the Russian airstrikes have mostly hit moderate rebel positions and civilians. In a video released by the U.S.-backed rebel group Tajamu Alezzah, jets are seen hitting a building claimed to be a location of the group in the town of Latamna in the central Hama province.

The group commander Jameel al-Saleh told a local Syrian news website that the group's location was hit by Russian jets but didn't specify the damage.

A group of local activists in the town of Talbiseh in Homs province recorded at least 16 civilians killed, including two children.

According to a U.S. senior official, Presidents Obama and Putin agreed on a process to "deconflict" military operations. The Russians on Wednesday "bypassed that process," the official said.

"That's not how responsible nations do business," the official said.

The development came after Pentagon officials, in a development first reported by Fox News, brushed aside an official request, or "demarche," from Russia to clear air space over northern Syria, where Moscow said it intended to conduct airstrikes against ISIS on behalf of Assad, according to sources who spoke to Fox News. The request was made in a heated discussion between a Russian three-star general and U.S. officials at the American Embassy in Baghdad, sources said.

"If you have forces in the area we request they leave," said the general, who used the word "please" in the contentious encounter.

A senior Pentagon official said the U.S., which also has been conducting airstrikes against ISIS, but does not support Assad, said the request was not honored.

"We still conducted our normal strike operations in Syria today," the official said. "We did not and have not changed our operations."

    "We still conducted our normal strike operations in Syria today"

    - Senior Pentagon official

State Department spokesman John Kirby told reporters the Russian airstrikes won't change the strategy of the U.S.-led coalition.

"The U.S.-led coalition will continue to fly missions over Iraq and Syria as planned and in support of our international mission to degrade and destroy ISIL," Kirby told reporters, while acknowledging the meeting at the American embassy in Baghdad.

Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told foreign ministers of world powers Wednesday that his country is "ready to forge standing channels of communication to ensure a maximally effective fight against terrorist groups."

Lavrov spoke to the U.N. Security Council shortly after Russia's defense ministry announced its jets are carrying out airstrikes on Islamic State group positions in Syria.

Lavrov said Russia would shortly circulate a draft council resolution to promote joint efforts against groups like the Islamic State.

The move by Moscow marks a major escalation in ongoing tensions between the two countries over military action in the war-torn country and comes moments after Russian lawmakers formally approved a request from Putin to authorize the use of troops in Syria. Putin said previously that Russia would strike ISIS targets.

The Federation Council, the upper house of Russia's parliament, discussed Putin's request for the authorization behind the closed doors. Sergei Ivanov, chief of Putin's administration, said in televised remarks that the parliament voted unanimously to approve the request.

Ivanov said the authorization is necessary "not in order to achieve some foreign policy goals" but "in order to defend Russia's national interests."

Putin is obligated to request parliamentary approval for any use of Russian troops abroad, according to the Russian Constitution. The last time he did so was before Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula in March 2014.

Putin's request comes after his bilateral meeting with Obama on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly meeting in New York, where the two were discussing Russia's recent military buildup in Syria.

A U.S. official told Fox News Monday the two leaders agreed to discuss political transition in Syria but were at odds over the role that Assad should play in resolving the civil conflict. The official said Obama reiterated to Putin that he does not believe there is a path to stability in Syria with Assad in power. Putin has said the world needs to support Assad because his military has the best chance to defeat ISIS militants.

Putin said the meeting, which lasted slightly more than 90 minutes, was “very constructive, business-like and frank".

"We are thinking about it, and we don't exclude anything," Putin told reporters at the time

The Kremlin reported that Putin hosted a meeting of the Russian security council at his residence Tuesday night outside of Moscow, saying that they were discussing terrorism and extremism.

On Tuesday, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius called on Russia to make a real contribution to the fight against ISIS, telling reporters at the United Nations that Moscow "is against the terrorists, it's not abnormal to launch strikes against them."

"The international community has hit (ISIS). France has hit (ISIS), Assad very little, and the Russians not at all. So one has to look at who does what," Fabius added.

Russia has been a staunch supporter of Assad during Syria's bloody civil war, and multiple reports have previously indicated that Russian troops are aiding Assad's forces. Israel's defense minister also said earlier this month that Russian troops are in Syria to help Assad fight the ISIS terror group.

On Wednesday, Reuters reported that Russia's Foreign Ministry told the news agency Interfax that a recently established operations center in Baghdad would help coordinate airstrikes and ground troops in Syria. Fox News first reported last week that the center had been set up by Russian, Syrian and Iranian military commanders with the goal of working with Iranian-backed Shia militias fighting ISIS.

Over the weekend, the Iraqi government announced that it would begin sharing "security and intelligence" information with Russia, Syria and Iran to help combat ISIS.

Meanwhile, intelligence sources told Fox News Friday that Iranian Quds Force commander Qasem Soleimani met with Russian military commanders in Baghdad Sept. 22. Fox News reported earlier this month that Soleimani met Putin in Moscow over the summer to discuss a joint military plan in Syria.

"The Russians are no longer advising, but co-leading the war in Syria," one intelligence official said at the time.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

 
What are the chances Russian jets and western jets might come across each other in the skies over syria?
 
It seems the first Russian strike was not against IS, but other anti-Assad fighters.

http://news.nationalpost.com/news/world/initial-reports-on-bombing-strongly-suggest-russia-is-in-syria-to-support-assad-not-destroy-isil
 
Altair said:
What are the chances Russian jets and western jets might come across each other in the skies over syria?

Well the Russians are coming across western jets over the Beaufort, the Bering, the Baltic, the Black, the North and the Irish Seas as well as the Seas of Japan and Okhotsk.  And they are not bothered about "pushing back" the western aircraft.  Syria is just one more playground for them.
 
Back
Top