- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 50
Re: So why aren‘t they doing this NOW with reservists?
Posted by Greg Wool from Abbotsford BC Canada on April 15, 1999 at 00:32:10:
In Reply to: So why aren‘t they doing this NOW with reservists? posted by Michael A. Dorosh on April 14, 1999 at 19:24:15:
Two points about that leap to mind Muppet. First, that
increases the required manpower to man things like
artillery. It also doesn‘t change the additional holes
like not having enough NCO‘s...well, competent ones
anyway. Also, poorly trained and inexperienced troops
would absorb serious casualties if matched up against
a professional army.
Lastly, using the tank as an example, what happens when
somebody in that tank is incapacitated, that means it is
completely out of service.
Posted by Greg Wool from Abbotsford BC Canada on April 15, 1999 at 00:32:10:
In Reply to: So why aren‘t they doing this NOW with reservists? posted by Michael A. Dorosh on April 14, 1999 at 19:24:15:
Two points about that leap to mind Muppet. First, that
increases the required manpower to man things like
artillery. It also doesn‘t change the additional holes
like not having enough NCO‘s...well, competent ones
anyway. Also, poorly trained and inexperienced troops
would absorb serious casualties if matched up against
a professional army.
Lastly, using the tank as an example, what happens when
somebody in that tank is incapacitated, that means it is
completely out of service.
