• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

New Rule Limits ‘Predatory’ Loans to Servicemembers

GAP

Army.ca Legend
Subscriber
Donor
Mentor
Reaction score
24
Points
380
New Rule Limits ‘Predatory’ Loans to Servicemembers
By Sgt. Sara Wood, USA American Forces Press Service
Article Link

WASHINGTON, Sept. 28, 2007 – The Defense Department is instituting new protections that will help defend servicemembers against high-interest emergency loans that can lead to a dangerous cycle of debt.
A new regulation included in the 2007 National Defense Authorization Act limits the annual percentage rate on payday loans, vehicle title loans and tax refund anticipation loans to 36 percent for active-duty servicemembers and their families. The change takes effect Oct. 1.

This is a big change, as the interest rates on these “predatory” loans can run as high as several hundred percent, said David S.C. Chu, undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness. Troops and their families have often fallen victim to these loans when they come up short between paychecks, and they can lead to serious problems, he said.

“It’s a big problem for commanders, because what happens is often these households get themselves in over their heads,” Chu said. “They’re $200 short between now and next payday, but they’re no better off when payday comes, so they need a bigger loan, and it just goes downhill from there.”

The 36 percent limit in the regulation includes all fees and charges, and the rule prohibits contracts requiring the use of a check or access to a bank account, mandatory arbitration and unreasonable legal notice, Chu said. The regulation makes it a criminal offense for lenders to knowingly charge a higher interest rate to servicemembers, so it is essential that military members be honest about their status when applying for loans, he said.

“One of the things that we’re a little worried about is people may be tempted, in order to get this old product that is now off limits, to answer this question in a non-factual way,” Chu said. “They need to be honest.”

It is the states’ responsibility to enforce the regulation, Chu said, and already 27 states have stepped forward and agreed to enforce restrictions on the financial institutions. The department has received the assurance of federal regulators that they will oversee the institutions they regulate, he said.
More on link
 
There's a lot of places like this near Canadian Bases too.

I've seen a few people get in a never-ending cycle of debt because of these places.  One of whom was released because of it.

My advice is to stay away...
 
Good post, GAP.  I know the Canadian government was trying to put a stop to the "payday" loans as well.
Something else they may want to consider, if a person is continually "short" between pays, or is in heavy debt, is budget counselling and/or debt consolidation.  
 
PMedMoe said:
Good post, GAP.  I know the Canadian government was trying to put a stop to the "payday" loans as well.
Something else they may want to consider, if a person is continually "short" between pays, or is in heavy debt, is budget counselling and/or debt consolidation. 

service members are pretty low on the income scale.  most people who have financial difficulties and debt - are also on the low income scale.  so this really has no relation to the military if u think about it.  you could say the same about college students, or mcdonald employees.

r
 
Members of the US military make significantly less than their Canadian counterparts in an equivalent rank. This is somewhat offset by a more robust system of perks and amenities but the actually pay levels are quite far apart.

I'm glad to see more government attention towards these payday loan places as their business practises are predatory in nature. Someone once told me that charging more than 60% interest per annum is considered racketeering so if that were true, I wonder how these businesses have been operating within the confines of the law.
 
Although it's nice that the US government is putting protections in for their servicemen, I don't understand why the rules aren't applicable across the board.  Aren't civilians in financial distress just as deserving of protection from these types of payday loan sharks?

Maybe I'm missing something.


Roy
 
Roy Harding said:
Although it's nice that the US government is putting protections in for their servicemen, I don't understand why the rules aren't applicable across the board.  Aren't civilians in financial distress just as deserving of protection from these types of payday loan sharks?

Maybe I'm missing something.


Roy

This is funny.  i just read articles last week saying the same stuff about lenders targeting illegals, poor people, hispanics, etc.  The 'victim' changes with each article.  I wonder if they have a template.  :)

These are adults entering into voluntary financial agreements. 

r
 
About time, hope our government one day extends the same policy and protection.
 
razorguns said:
service members are pretty low on the income scale.  most people who have financial difficulties and debt - are also on the low income scale.  so this really has no relation to the military if u think about it.  you could say the same about college students, or mcdonald employees.

I don't know what services McDonald's employees or American military personnel are offered by their employer, however, the Canadian military does offer financial services to military members.  Maybe the Americans should consider it as well.

razorguns said:
These are adults entering into voluntary financial agreements.

And when they are heavily in debt do they not become an administrative burden?
 
Back
Top