• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Canada says it will look at increasing its defence spending and tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever growing sanctions list.

By Tonda MacCharles
Ottawa Bureau
Mon., March 7, 2022

Riga, LATVIA—On the 13th day of the brutal Russian bid to claim Ukraine as its own, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is showing up at the Latvian battle group led by Canadian soldiers, waving the Maple Leaf and a vague hint at more money for the military.

Canada has been waving the NATO flag for nearly seven years in Latvia as a bulwark against Russia’s further incursions in Eastern Europe.

Canada stepped up to lead one of NATO’s four battle groups in 2015 — part of the defensive alliance’s display of strength and solidarity with weaker member states after Russia invaded Ukraine and seized the Crimean peninsula in 2014. Trudeau arrived in the Latvian capital late Monday after meetings in the U.K. with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Netherlands Prime Minister Mark Rutte.

Earlier Monday, faced with a seemingly unstoppable war in Ukraine, Trudeau said he will look at increasing Canada’s defence spending. Given world events, he said there are “certainly reflections to have.”

And Canada tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever-growing sanctions list.

The latest round of sanctions includes names Trudeau said were identified by jailed Russian opposition leader and Putin nemesis Alexei Navalny.

However, on a day when Trudeau cited the new sanctions, and Johnson touted new measures meant to expose Russian property owners in his country, Rutte admitted sanctions are not working.

Yet they all called for more concerted international efforts over the long haul, including more economic measures and more humanitarian aid, with Johnson and Rutte divided over how quickly countries need to get off Russian oil and gas.

The 10 latest names on Canada’s target list do not include Roman Abramovich — a Russian billionaire Navalny has been flagging to Canada since at least 2017. Canada appears to have sanctioned about 20 of the 35 names on Navalny’s list.

The Conservative opposition says the Liberal government is not yet exerting maximum pressure on Putin, and should do more to bolster Canadian Forces, including by finally approving the purchase of fighter jets.

Foreign affairs critic Michael Chong said in an interview that Ottawa must still sanction “additional oligarchs close to President Putin who have significant assets in Canada.”

Abramovich owns more than a quarter of the public shares in steelmaking giant Evraz, which has operations in Alberta and Saskatchewan and has supplied most of the steel for the government-owned Trans Mountain pipeline project.

Evraz’s board of directors also includes two more Russians the U.S. government identified as “oligarchs” in 2019 — Aleksandr Abramov and Aleksandr Frolov — and its Canadian operations have received significant support from the federal government.

That includes at least $27 million in emergency wage subsidies during the pandemic, as well as $7 million through a fund meant to help heavy-polluters reduce emissions that cause climate change, according to the company’s most recent annual report.

In addition to upping defence spending, the Conservatives want NORAD’s early warning system upgraded, naval shipbuilding ramped up and Arctic security bolstered.

In London, Johnson sat down with Trudeau and Rutte at the Northolt airbase. Their morning meetings had a rushed feel, with Johnson starting to usher press out before Trudeau spoke. His office said later that the British PM couldn’t squeeze the full meeting in at 10 Downing Street because Johnson’s “diary” was so busy that day. The three leaders held an afternoon news conference at 10 Downing.

But before that Trudeau met with the Queen, saying she was “insightful” and they had a “useful, for me anyway, conversation about global affairs.”

Trudeau meets with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg Tuesday in Latvia.

The prime minister will also meet with three Baltic leaders, the prime ministers of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, in the Latvian capital of Riga.

The Liberals announced they would increase the 500 Canadian Forces in Latvia by another 460 troops. The Canadians are leading a multinational battle group, one of four that are part of NATO’s deployments in the region.

Another 3,400 Canadians could be deployed to the region in the months to come, on standby for NATO orders.

But Canada’s shipments of lethal aid to Ukraine were slow to come in the view of the Conservatives, and the Ukrainian Canadian community.

And suddenly Western allies are eyeing each other’s defence commitments.

At the Downing Street news conference, Rutte noted the Netherlands will increase its defence budget to close to two per cent of GDP. Germany has led the G7, and doubled its defence budget in the face of Putin’s invasion and threats. Johnson said the U.K. defence spending is about 2.4 per cent and declined to comment on Canada’s defence spending which is 1.4 per cent of GDP.

But Johnson didn’t hold back.

“What we can’t do, post the invasion of Ukraine is assume that we go back to a kind of status quo ante, a kind of new normalization in the way that we did after the … seizure of Crimea and the Donbas area,” Johnson said. “We’ve got to recognize that things have changed and that we need a new focus on security and I think that that is kind of increasingly understood by everybody.”

Trudeau stood by his British and Dutch counterparts and pledged Canada would do more.

He defended his government’s record, saying Ottawa is gradually increasing spending over the next decade by 70 per cent. Then Trudeau admitted more might be necessary.

“We also recognize that context is changing rapidly around the world and we need to make sure that women and men have certainty and our forces have all the equipment necessary to be able to stand strongly as we always have. As members of NATO. We will continue to look at what more we can do.”

The three leaders — Johnson, a conservative and Trudeau and Rutte, progressive liberals — in a joint statement said they “will continue to impose severe costs on Russia.”

Arriving for the news conference from Windsor Castle, Trudeau had to detour to enter Downing Street as loud so-called Freedom Convoy protesters bellowed from outside the gate. They carried signs marked “Tuck Frudeau” and “Free Tamara” (Lich).

Protester Jeff Wyatt who said he has no Canadian ties told the Star he came to stand up for Lich and others who were leading a “peaceful protest” worldwide against government “lies” about COVID-19 and what he called Trudeau’s “tyranny.”

Elsewhere in London, outside the Russian embassy, other protesters and passersby reflected on what they said was real tyranny — the Russian attack on Ukraine. “I think we should be as tough as possible to get this stopped, as tough as possible,” said protester Clive Martinez.
 
war-time-homes-saskatoon.jpg


Welcome to the first home of the Baby Boomers - in Canada

war-time-home-in-saskatoon.jpg



My wife, number 7 of 11, was born into a house smaller than that - with two bedrooms and Mum and Dad (him of the RCNVR stoker service) taking in boarders and keeping a couple of chickens while he worked as a boilerman at the Sanitarium. Walking to work over the ice on the Saskatchewan.

Something to do with expectations, regulations and happiness.

Those are the spitting image of what we're in.
 
war-time-homes-saskatoon.jpg


Welcome to the first home of the Baby Boomers - in Canada

war-time-home-in-saskatoon.jpg



My wife, number 7 of 11, was born into a house smaller than that - with two bedrooms and Mum and Dad (him of the RCNVR stoker service) taking in boarders and keeping a couple of chickens while he worked as a boilerman at the Sanitarium. Walking to work over the ice on the Saskatchewan.

Something to do with expectations, regulations and happiness.
Child Services would take your kids if you were raising 11 in a house that size these days... Just because people tolerated a particular hardship before does not mean that we should be aspiring for future generations to share in the same hardship. There is a reason Boomers didn't raise 11 kids in an 800 sq. ft home.

Also, communities don't want houses like that anywhere near them, because those homes would lower the value of their 3500 sq. ft home with a double garage.
 
And for reference - here is what home was like for her Mum and Dad

Drifted sand, coal oil lamps and chop the ice on the well.

51BF07C1-1560-95DA-43B9FA197F8817DD.jpg
 
Child Services would take your kids if you were raising 11 in a house that size these days... Just because people tolerated a particular hardship before does not mean that we should be aspiring for future generations to share in the same hardship. There is a reason Boomers didn't raise 11 kids in an 800 sq. ft home.

Also, communities don't want houses like that anywhere near them, because those homes would lower the value of their 3500 sq. ft home with a double garage.

Some folks just aspire to a wigwam by the water. ;)
 
Child Services would take your kids if you were raising 11 in a house that size these days... Just because people tolerated a particular hardship before does not mean that we should be aspiring for future generations to share in the same hardship. There is a reason Boomers didn't raise 11 kids in an 800 sq. ft home.

Also, communities don't want houses like that anywhere near them, because those homes would lower the value of their 3500 sq. ft home with a double garage.

Hey now. Don't throw stones at my little house.

The actual reason we stopped having large families is the move from rural to urban environments, industrialization and rising affluence.

Affluence has a big role to play in child number. Poor people have more kids.
 
Hey now. Don't throw stones at my little house.

The actual reason we stopped having large families is the move from rural to urban environments, industrialization and rising affluence.

Affluence has a big role to play in child number. Poor people have more kids.
Partly because of child mortality rates. Partly because in agriculture child labour was a real thing.
 
Also, communities don't want houses like that anywhere near them, because those homes would lower the value of their 3500 sq. ft home with a double garage.
Also some communities don’t want a 3,500 sq Ft home and double garage near them as it will devalue their 6,000+ sq ft 3 or 4 car garage home on a 2+ acre lot.
*I’m the only one in my neighborhood that only has a 3 car garage, the 6 other homes have 4 car garages. But we built first so they can suck it ;)

Some districts of my country have actually now passed laws to ensure that they are zoned so the minimum acreage to build on is 20 per home as they don’t want their multi million dollar estates devalued by riff raft living in million dollar homes. Yet locked the taxes to punish anyone with a great than 1 acre lot and one can’t get tax breaks for agricultural or conservation under 5 acres.

Solutions are to move further out to the country where one can get more land cheaper, but the schools and other institutions and services are generally worse etc.
 
0-10,000 for a serviced lot in a country town in Saskatchewan.
100,000 for a 2-3 bedroom modular home
50-100,000 installation and set up.

30 minutes from Starbucks and Malls.
 
Hey now. Don't throw stones at my little house.
I'm not against small homes at all, I'm far more in favour of them than giant empty homes for two people, but I bet you wouldn't want to raise 11 kids ion your house.

The actual reason we stopped having large families is the move from rural to urban environments, industrialization and rising affluence.

Affluence has a big role to play in child number. Poor people have more kids.
Partly because of child mortality rates. Partly because in agriculture child labour was a real thing.
You're both spot on, and throw in the cost of raising children in the modern age. Apparently there are lots of people who would have liked to have had more than one or two kids if it was more affordable.

In fishing child labour was also a very real thing, my father and his brothers had to farm/fish to support the family. One of my uncles dropped out of school at grade 8 to work, and my father only attended grade 12 one day a week, he did the rest of the week's school work in the evenings after work.

My father was also the one that pushed my brother and I get good, stable jobs that paid well, so we didn't have to do what he did.

To bring this back to something remotely related to the CAF/spending, as @rmc_wannabe mentioned, today's youth don't view the CAF as a good, stable job, they see it as a "meh" job, with cons that outweigh the pros. It doesn't matter that the median household income is lower than a MCpl makes, it matters that even with the pay a MCpl makes, we can't attract and keep people.
 
Also some communities don’t want a 3,500 sq Ft home and double garage near them as it will devalue their 6,000+ sq ft 3 or 4 car garage home on a 2+ acre lot.
*I’m the only one in my neighborhood that only has a 3 car garage, the 6 other homes have 4 car garages. But we built first so they can suck it ;)

Some districts of my country have actually now passed laws to ensure that they are zoned so the minimum acreage to build on is 20 per home as they don’t want their multi million dollar estates devalued by riff raft living in million dollar homes. Yet locked the taxes to punish anyone with a great than 1 acre lot and one can’t get tax breaks for agricultural or conservation under 5 acres.

Solutions are to move further out to the country where one can get more land cheaper, but the schools and other institutions and services are generally worse etc.

But have you got a Ceement pond out yonder? ;)

the beverly hillbillies dance GIF by TV Land Classic
 
And for reference - here is what home was like for her Mum and Dad

Drifted sand, coal oil lamps and chop the ice on the well.

51BF07C1-1560-95DA-43B9FA197F8817DD.jpg
Wow. It’s not an existence anyone would wish for, but those who came out of it ended up having a grit (not necessarily sand grit), determination and faith in the future of this country that few today can understand. That shack reminds me of my own (maternal) grandmother growing up with five other siblings literally beside the railroad tracks in Kansas and seeing her family shack literally catch fire from the embers spewed out by a passing locomotive. She somehow ended up being one of the sweetest, wisest people I’ve ever known. To all such people we owe a gigantic debt of gratitude.
 
Reliable birth control is a huge factor governing family size (choice).

Realistically, no-one has to be too concerned about a dozen people in an 800 sq ft home.

1600 sq ft is enough for 5 BR, 2 baths, kitchen/dining, living, rec, utility.
 
The Boomers aren't all at fault. Housing construction has shifted from accommodating those starting out in the market. There are few if any lower priced units/rentals coming onto the market. We have tens of thousands of immigrants cueing up for the same units as our graduating youth; driving up the prices. Those immigrants group together to purchase a unit so one house is occupied by a large extended family with a large number of incomes to cover the mortgage. Its not just two incomes but 4 or 5 and we haven't been able to adjust to this new reality. I am not advocating for less immigration but rather immigration needs to go hand in hand with housing development and job creation in the industrial sector and that means being competitive globally. Energy costs are destroying that competitiveness.
100%
 
war-time-homes-saskatoon.jpg


Welcome to the first home of the Baby Boomers - in Canada

war-time-home-in-saskatoon.jpg



My wife, number 7 of 11, was born into a house smaller than that - with two bedrooms and Mum and Dad (him of the RCNVR stoker service) taking in boarders and keeping a couple of chickens while he worked as a boilerman at the Sanitarium. Walking to work over the ice on the Saskatchewan.

Something to do with expectations, regulations and happiness.
No one bats an eye that Kirkhill’s on his eleventh wife?
 
Hey now. Don't throw stones at my little house.

The actual reason we stopped having large families is the move from rural to urban environments, industrialization and rising affluence.

Affluence has a big role to play in child number. Poor people have more kids.
Education - educating all women, giving them equal rights, opportunities and realising them as proper 100% citizens of a society, those are the reasons for a society to have less children.
 
Education - educating all women, giving them equal rights, opportunities and realising them as proper 100% citizens of a society, those are the reasons for a society to have less children.
crap Pardon my french but schools have been open to all for over a century. My grandmother was the educated one whilst my grandfather had grade 8. Reasons: the Catholic church no longer has the influence it once did, women are working so less time to raise a family, the cost of a home is keeping many working without hope of starting a family, marriage itself is under threat as society has adopted a totally self-centred approach to life so if your significant other (hate that term) doesn't suit, find another. That approach to family doesn't leave space for kids. Rant off.
 
Back
Top