On the issue of Home Inspectors:
In Canada, there is yet to be a national governing and regulatory body that oversees Home Inspectors. They have at best, associations that attempt to provide continuing education to its members. This industry is trying to gain control of its own licensing and membership and is making small inroads to achieving that goal. As it stands right now, anyone with or without adequate experience can say they are a home inspector, they only have to satisfy the local business licensing rules to set up shop.
So back to my earlier post where I suggested that a potential home buyer learn what they need to know about home construction and relative legislation. A home inspector (if you managed to get a good one), will point out visible flaws, defects and deficiencies of a home and give you an average opinion of the home's condition based on what one would expect to see of a similar home of a similar age and construction. In other words, if the entire subdivision was built by a crappy builder but all the other homes similar to the one you were purchasing came in line with the each other in their conditions, you'd get a mid-range opinion. The key phrase to watch for is, "In a home of similar construction, age and maintenance level you would expect this..." It doesn't mean the home to ticketyboo, it means compared to the same type of home, it's either better, the same, or worse and that doesn't mean that the initial construction was great or worse. The HI isn't comparing your purchase to the general construction field, just to a similar home.
The part I love the best about a HI is the limited or zero warranty on their opinion of the house. In other words. if they told you the house was fine, and it ends up being a white elephant and money pit, you can't go back to the HI and sue them. If we as a consumer, were to buy any other product or service and be told, "I'm not going to be liable if my opinion is wrong or the product sucks", we'd be running in the opposite direction from that product or provider YET, when it comes to a buying a house, we take everything about the house AT FACE VALUE!
HI will not look beyond the obvious, or tear down anything get into the nitty-gritty of a home. They will provide the potential purchaser an idea of what systems are being used in the home, and how to operate them, what to look out for as far as maintenance is concerned and potential visible problems or blatant building code violations. (we'll talk about those later)
Now to be fair to the HI who go further and attain some licensing and accreditation in certain areas such as WETT or who have registered with their respective associations, they are marginally better equipped to check out a house (they will bear an RHI behind their name). There is a little rivalry going on between HI and engineers as to who provides the better service. Engineers are licensed. They are registered. They can give an opinion based on more than a visual take. And if they screw up, you CAN sue them. HI, like to say that an engineer is too expensive and you can guess what the engineers say about the HI industry. Bottom line is, if you as a home purchaser, haven't got a clue about home construction, systems and maintenance, nothing from either profession is going to mean diddly squat to you if you didn't do your research.
Ok, so some things to think about: If you are unsure about the structural integrity of the home (because you did your research and saw some things that set off alarm bells), hire an engineer. If you aren't sure about the price/value of the home, bring in a house appraiser. Then ask yourself if the above two scenarios are occurring, should you even be going ahead with the offer or just moving along to the next home (that's where the learning to say No comes in handy)?