- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 210
I read a letter on the Toronto Star's website complaining of the lack of Canadian content in Michaelle Jean's new coat of arms, found here:
http://www.gg.ca/heraldry/emb/03/index_e.asp
While it seems kind of a petty thing to fault her for, I was curious as to people's perceptions. Aside from the crown, being symoblic of her role and arguably a British symbol, there isn't a single piece of Canadian symbolism. While it's apparently a tradition for the GG to include personal heritage in the coat of arms, it seems strange that there would be 0 inclusion of anything Canadian. Clarkson had the loon, Leblanc had maple leaves and native headdress, etc. Would we know this was a Canadian coat of arms if it wasn't explicitly stated?
Opinions?
http://www.gg.ca/heraldry/emb/03/index_e.asp
While it seems kind of a petty thing to fault her for, I was curious as to people's perceptions. Aside from the crown, being symoblic of her role and arguably a British symbol, there isn't a single piece of Canadian symbolism. While it's apparently a tradition for the GG to include personal heritage in the coat of arms, it seems strange that there would be 0 inclusion of anything Canadian. Clarkson had the loon, Leblanc had maple leaves and native headdress, etc. Would we know this was a Canadian coat of arms if it wasn't explicitly stated?
Opinions?