• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Flight of the Phoenix

mdh

Sr. Member
Reaction score
0
Points
210
Saw this movie last night and I wanted to run it past the pilots/techies on the board.

Although the premiss of rebuilding a plane out of scrap was far-fetched, then again, who knows, perhaps it would be possible to do such a thing

Also I did wonder why the Boxcar transport was flying so low in the opening sequences?

Was that just Hollywood license - or would a fully-loaded radial engine bird like the one in the movie be forced to fly close to the desert floor?  

I know that hot climates impact performance and altitude - but it just didn't look realistic to me.


Any observations or thoughts on the film?

Cheers, mdh
 
Haven't seen it yet, MDH, but remember that Hollywood's main "Line of Operation" is to make money and make more movies.  Sometimes it has to "tart things up a bit", as the Brits would say.

Could they build it out of scrap...if there is someone with MacGyver's resourcefulness and Kelly Johnson's (of Lockheed Skunkworks fame) aerodynamic savvy and the right materials conveniently "lying" around, sure...they might be able to make something.  Would it look like the Phoenix?  Well, in a Hollywood movie it would!  ;D

Re: low flying -- radial engines generally make more power with cold dense air...closer to sea level is better.  If you are turbo/supercharged, higher altitude will keep the engine from losing too much power at higher altitudes.  Enough to balance off the reduced lift in thinner air at altitude, kinda hard to tell.  C-119's were well known for carrying a fiar bit, but they had to burn off a fair bit of fuel to climb up to higher altitudes if they were going for range.  Now if they were going to drop a few thousand keys of coke to some folks waiting in a forest on the coasts of Canada or the States, they might fly lower...  ;)

Cheers,
Duey
 
Now if they were going to drop a few thousand keys of coke to some folks waiting in a forest on the coasts of Canada or the States, they might fly lower...  

That's one quick way to build up your multi-time experience in civvie aviation.   :eek:

As a side note the radials were using a starter system with shot-gun shells - (needless to say it added to the dramatic tension as Dennis Quaid - left with only five shells - fired one shell after another to start the engine... but I won't give any   more away.)


cheers, mdh
 
I believed it more when Jimmy Stewart did it.


Funnily enough I barely remember Stewart in the film (which I haven't seen for nearly 30 years) -Hardy Kruger was the guy I most remember - with his steel glasses and the Teutonic arrogance.  

For those of us who are of a "certain vintage" the original Flight was a staple of Saturday afternoon TV movies - I think Mark Steyn gets it right with his review below,

cheers, all, mdh



FLIGHT OF THE PHOENIX

The Flight of the Phoenix rises from the ashes. Remember the original? James Stewart, Richard Attenborough, Ernest Borgnine, Peter Finch, Ian Bannen, Ronald Fraser, Hardy Krüger. The sort of cast you took for granted back in 1965. I have blurry childhood memories of rainy weekends, switching on the telly and usually finding some movie in which an Anglo-American-Aussie-Euro combination of blokes would be wiping the sweat from their brow in dusty climes and trying to figure a way out of the fix they were in.

The Flight of the Phoenix was the one where a big transport plane crashes in the desert and they're all set to die until creepy Hardy Krüger comes up with a plan to saw the big plane in two, rebuild one half as a small plane and fly out in it. That's all I thought I remembered until this new version came along, and the longer it went on the more images from the Robert Aldrich original floated up out of the past. What I mainly recalled was how great Hardy Krüger was, and I haven't consciously given him a thought in decades, and if I did I was probably confusing him with Hardy Amies.

Anyway, John Moore decided the time was ripe for a new Phoenix, so he sawed the old movie in two, rewrote one half and tries to get it to take off. Instead of the Sahara, we're now in the Gobi Desert, somewhere in the shifting whispering sands on the Chinese/Mongolian border. In the Jimmy Stewart role, Moore has Dennis Quaid, last seen in The Day After Tomorrow, the laugh-a-minute eco-comedy in which Dick Cheney's press conference brings on a new ice age. Presumably someone figured Quaid's now the go-to guy for meteorological extremes: if he's great freezing his butt off with nothing but snow for hundreds of miles, he'll be just as good sweating buckets with nothing but sand for hundreds of miles. Sadly, he's far less fun when you get him off the ice: in that sense, he's less the new Jimmy Stewart than the new Sonja Henie. As hardbitten cynical pilot Frank Towns, he makes his living flying in to underperforming oil ventures, capping the wells and flying everyone out.

'They call you "Shut 'Em Downâ ? Towns,' says Miranda Otto helpfully at the beginning. The first thing he shuts down is his facial expression, which is sourly clenched throughout - either that or he got a touch of frostbite during the Dick Cheney ice age and it hasn't thawed out yet. Despite the lavish special effects in the interminable crash sequence, you're left with the vague impression that he's nosedived into the sand because he was in a bad mood.

So he gets his just desserts, which is just desert stretching as far as the eye can see. In 1965, they had a real plane, and the stuntman flying it - the great Paul Mantz - crashed it and died. But, except for his contributions, the film was all acting: just the wreckage in a sandpit and a great human drama going on around it. Now we have computers, so when in doubt John Moore throws in more sand. Things getting a bit slow? No problem, instant sandstorm blows in. Can't find a way to kill off Third Minor Character From The Right? Watch out, here comes a ton of sand. They're building the plane too fast and you need to set 'em back? Not to worry, bury it in sand. Sand, sand everywhere. About 90 minutes in, I got so itchy I could have sworn it had got in my shorts.

The desert may blow you away but the players don't. It's the usual Benetton-ad casting: there's a Mexican-American chef and a Scots oil worker and a black co-pilot and an atheist Saudi who reminded me of Topol at all the wrong moments. There's a small Mongol horde that wants to kill 'em, but Moore uses them mainly as a novelty act while he's waiting for the next truckload of sand. And there's a company suit played by Hugh Laurie, who comes nearest to the spirit of the original. Today we mock the over-familiar ensemble approach that was standard in Robert Aldrich's day, but guys like Ernest Borgnine and Peter Finch have incredible presence and Moore could have used a little of that. Casting good but unknown actors only underlines how little there is to the characters. Giovanni Ribisi, as the nerdy dweeby geeky egghead with the plan to build a new plane, is called Elliott but manages to be almost as sinisterly Teutonic as Hardy Krüger. He has rimless Gestapo specs and an Aryan blond dye job. So the construction of the Phoenix is a race against time, as they have to get back to civilisation before his roots begin to show.    

Miss Otto plays the lead oil engineer - or, to use the technical term, The Girl. In the original, the only woman was a briefly glimpsed mirage, so in theory the addition of an Aussie lovely ought to improve things. At the crucial moment, one assumes, she'll save the day by using the underwiring from her bra to hold the propeller in place. But Miss Otto is a fully paid-up member of the Amalgamated Union of Action-Flick Chicks and, under their new guidelines, the lovelier you are the more you grimace your way through the movie, the curvier your form the more you slouch around in shapeless overalls and work shirts. So she matches Dennis Quaid scowl for scowl, and, if you're thinking a topless scene wouldn't go amiss in this movie, you'll have to make do with Dennis taking his shirt off, which the camera lingers on somewhat gratuitously. Horses sweat, men perspire, but Dennis just glows. Time to get back on the ice.
The Spectator, March 12th 2005
 
Remember "Flight of the Phoenix' the original version well. The screenplay was adopted from a
book, written I think by a gentleman from the UK. Veteran air show and test pilot Paul Mantz
well known on the North American air show circuit was killed during one of the flying sequences.
The film had a fine cast, and featured James Stewart. Stewart was a real pilot, having attained
the rank of Colonel in the USArmy Air Force, World War II, and flew the B-24 "Liberator" on
many missions over occupied Europe - he was later promoted to BGEN in the USAir Force Reserve
- you had to get well into the original movie before you realized that the plan (in the plot) was
to rebuild the C-119 as a single engine aircraft, based on the advice from Hardy Kruger, assumed
to be an aeronautical engineer, but in fact, a model aircraft kit designer. I remember that the C-119
in RCAF service required aircrews to wear a parachute (most of which turned out to be chest packs)
Have not seen the new version - Regards, MacLeod
 
mdh said:
Also I did wonder why the Boxcar transport was flying so low in the opening sequences?

I havn't seen the movie either, was it flying in enemy territory or something? Because in many cases, the lower your altitude, the less vulnerable you are to radar right? Anyway just makin' a guess. :)
 
Maybe there was this really big storm they were trying to avoid.  Just a guess.
 
Remember "Flight of the Phoenix' the original version well. The screenplay was adopted from a
book, written I think by a gentleman from the UK. Veteran air show and test pilot Paul Mantz
well known on the North American air show circuit was killed during one of the flying sequences.
The film had a fine cast, and featured James Stewart. Stewart was a real pilot, having attained
the rank of Colonel in the USArmy Air Force, World War II, and flew the B-24 "Liberator" on
many missions over occupied Europe - he was later promoted to BGEN in the USAir Force Reserve
- you had to get well into the original movie before you realized that the plan (in the plot) was
to rebuild the C-119 as a single engine aircraft, based on the advice from Hardy Kruger, assumed
to be an aeronautical engineer, but in fact, a model aircraft kit designer. I remember that the C-119
in RCAF service required aircrews to wear a parachute (most of which turned out to be chest packs)
Have not seen the new version - Regards, MacLeod

I recall reading about the accident that claimed Mantz during the filming.   I don't remember him as a fixture on the airshow circuit but your post brings to mind a time when the Canadian Forces served as something of a repository for air show performers and vintage aircraft.   There was a character named Ormond Hayden-Baillie who had been a member of the RCAF, and, being a rather wealthy ex-pat Brit, owned and flew a retired RCAF T33; he also owned a Sea Fury. Legend has it that Ormond called in a lot of favours to keep the T33 flying from RCAF inventories but I'm sure that's just irresponsible hearsay   ;). He was eventually killed flying a P51 in Germany in the mid-70s.   Some of the older pilots here might remember him.

cheers, mdh
 
Maybe there was this really big storm they were trying to avoid.   Just a guess.

Ah, if only it were that simple Kincanucks!    ;) (and since it's just a movie, easy to dismiss but I figure why not have some fun with it). And since I've got time on my hands today, and just a touch bored, I thought I might expand on this topic.

I did some quick and dirty research, and it seems that the Gobi Desert is only about 5 per cent sand, and the rest is dominated by the Altai Mountain range rising to an altitude of 12,000 feet.

Tempatures in the desert region are in the range of 112-114 degrees F (40C) in summer.   The C119 was a twin radial (Wright Cyclone 18) powered aircraft producing 3,500 HP in each engine and a service ceiling of approximately 25,000 feet. It being an ancient hauler, though, its overall performance would undoubtedly be degraded.

However, flying above 10,000 feet (ASL) is problematic unless you have a pressurized aircraft or oxygen (esp. with passengers) are heavy (possibly overloaded), and there would be a desire to maximize radial engine performance (as Duey pointed out) it probably would make sense to fly at lower altitudes close to sea level - the mountain range still presents a potential problem (though they are mostly located in the south-eastern portion of Mongolia and the movie doesn't tell us the exact route we'll assume for the fun of it they skirted the southwest extremity of the range).

Assuming the destination was UlaamBaator, then the low level alt. as a navigation strategy is plausible.   The best solution might be to fly at night when it's cooler, clearer, but again not wise to fly above 5,000 asl without oxygen at night.

But the night flight option assumes adequate IFR equipment/nav on the C119 - or attempting a night VFR (always a risk of disorientation with  no lights on the ground) and hoping Mongolian charts are up to date and accurate to indicate high obstacles, terrain, etc - you can also rely (heavily) on GPS and hope that Dennis Quaid's instrument skills are up to it.

Trying to fly above the storm in the movie was probably not a real option since it's unikely you would be able to climb high enough (or fast enough with a rate of climb probably much less than the 1,000 feet per minute specified for the C119) in an unpressurized aircraft.   Flying around the storm was probably the only solution.

Or scrap the C119 and get something with turbines and a pressurized hull   ;D

cheers, mdh  
 
Back
Top