• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Battle of Hoth revisionist history

But they weren’t looking for a pitched battle anyways, they were hiding and running at the time.
Then wouldn't some retrofitted fighters that you might be able to fly out make more sense than a network of ground defense turrets that are sure writeoffs?
 
Then wouldn't some retrofitted fighters that you might be able to fly out make more sense than a network of ground defense turrets that are sure writeoffs?
They kept saying how tough it was to get anything working. The speeders they had at the time where the only ones they were able to get running at the time.

They should have invested in minefields as well…
 
They kept saying how tough it was to get anything working. The speeders they had at the time where the only ones they were able to get running at the time.

They should have invested in minefields as well…
I'm not thinking so much as close support against the AT-AT's under the shield, but in opposing the landing itself- intercepting the drop ships in atmosphere and/or striking the landing zone.

The x-wings were demonstrably capable of atmospheric flight in those conditions (they took off for the evac after all), energy weapons work- there seems like a major opportunity for homefield advantage if they put in the time.
 
I'm not thinking so much as close support against the AT-AT's under the shield, but in opposing the landing itself- intercepting the drop ships in atmosphere and/or striking the landing zone.

The x-wings were demonstrably capable of atmospheric flight in those conditions (they took off for the evac after all), energy weapons work- there seems like a major opportunity for homefield advantage if they put in the time.
Conservation of forces. The Alliance was fighting a delaying action to preserve their forces for future engagements. Pushing out all your primary platform (only losers like Y-Wings) and risking their loss when they were needed for escort duties for your cargo / personnel evacuation would have introduced excessive risk.
 
Conservation of forces. The Alliance was fighting a delaying action to preserve their forces for future engagements. Pushing out all your primary platform (only losers like Y-Wings) and risking their loss when they were needed for escort duties for your cargo / personnel evacuation would have introduced excessive risk.
sad bomber noises
 
Conservation of forces. The Alliance was fighting a delaying action to preserve their forces for future engagements. Pushing out all your primary platform (only losers like Y-Wings) and risking their loss when they were needed for escort duties for your cargo / personnel evacuation would have introduced excessive risk.
Who said all? Up thread I specifically said not all. A small number retrofitted to fight passably in the atmosphere against un/lightly armed landing ships, with either zero TIES or unretrofitted TIES hobbled by the environment, out of range of the capital ships. Is the risk excessive relative to the reward of ending the land assault before it begins?
 
But if you dive into some of the lore, apparently the intense cold weather and winds on Hoth made fighter support very difficult.
Not that the cold near-vaccuum of space and ability to have gravitational manipulation on ships as small as the Millenium Falcon should bear on the lore-masters.

Hollywood's biggest problem is writers who are not bright enough to think through the consequences of the technologies/magic they inject into their stories, or too lazy to bother.
 
This was an intergalactic version of the Battle of Dunkirk. There was no way for the Rebel Alliance to out maneuver the Imperial Forces, so it was more imperative to delay and feint while the evacuation took place.

The only thing I would have done differently on the Imperial side is a proper manned reconnaissance... vice those stupid drone things that can be taken out with a simple blaster
 
Back
Top