• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Arctic/Offshore Patrol Ship AOPS

I kept getting told to 'go back to Toronto' 15 years ago (I hate T.O. FWIW) so I don't think it's a new thing, just more pronounced.
This is what I tell people all the time about moving there. Be prepared for the not from around here crowd. It's a maritime problem. Can't even get a job in some places if you don't have the right last name...
 
Indeed, many people miss or ignore the advantages that long term large scale domestic investment/production can offer, it's really a value to the community and I'm not surprised that the politicians at the event relentlessly hammered that fact home. With the city growing from other investments and populations increases, the area should be doing well for decades to come.

As a bit of a Canadian history nerd, it's great to see many forgotten or underappreciated service members from the past finally get some well needed recognition. A lot of the navy's founding or important figures are lucky to get a random out of the way building or a cadet unit named after them at best. Shame this is likely the only time we will use this kind of naming scheme for awhile.

When it comes to defence production if we actually produced good reliable equipment for a fair price that also employed Canadians I'd tow that line.
 
And while we congratulate ourselves .....











One thing I think the AOP's have over this is their ice class, these ships appear not to have any ice rating that I can find, other than ice strengthened. The AOP's on the other hand are PC 5 hull and PC 4 bow.
 
One thing I think the AOP's have over this is their ice class, these ships appear not to have any ice rating that I can find, other than ice strengthened. The AOP's on the other hand are PC 5 hull and PC 4 bow.

It is less the detail of the construction that intrigues me than the speed at which the Norwegians can decide, design, build, correct, repeat. And the numbers that they can produce while our elephant belabours over a mouse.
 
Last edited:
One thing I think the AOP's have over this is their ice class, these ships appear not to have any ice rating that I can find, other than ice strengthened. The AOP's on the other hand are PC 5 hull and PC 4 bow.

It is less the detail of the construction that intrigues me than the speed at which the Norwegians can decide, design, build, correct, repeat. And the the numbers that they can produce while our elephant belabours over a mouse.
Norwegian language wikipedia page says that Jan Mayen has an ice rating of "ice class ICE-1A*F (>100 cm ice)" under the DNV-GL Finnish-Swedish Ice Class Rules.
 
Norwegian language wikipedia page says that Jan Mayen has an ice rating of "ice class ICE-1A*F (>100 cm ice)" under the DNV-GL Finnish-Swedish Ice Class Rules.

So they can go farther north, later in the season, than frigates and MCDVs? Operate in Hudson's Bay, the St Lawrence, the Lakes and the Gulf, and the Lower MacKenzie? Not to mention the Pacific Coast and Inside Passage?
 
Norwegian language wikipedia page says that Jan Mayen has an ice rating of "ice class ICE-1A*F (>100 cm ice)" under the DNV-GL Finnish-Swedish Ice Class Rules.
That appears to be roughly PC 6-7 whereas the AOPs are PC 5 with a PC 4 bow.

1682883636012.png

According to Wiki there are only about
11 x PC 3 class icebreakers in the world.
1 with 4 planned PC 2's
That wiki list starts with vessels built 2007 does not include existing CCG or Russian icebreakers. The big nuke icebreakers appear to be roughly PC 2-3

All in all out of the modern icebreaker builds, the AOP's are no "slushbreakers" and in fact rank quite well.
 
This is a little unrelated to the current topic of conversation, but does anyone know why the Harry DeWolf class is so limited in its ASW capabilities? I get it's an OPS, but it could stand to have something to counter submarines besides that helicopter.
 
This is a little unrelated to the current topic of conversation, but does anyone know why the Harry DeWolf class is so limited in its ASW capabilities? I get it's an OPS, but it could stand to have something to counter submarines besides that helicopter.
That is like asking why the CP-140 Aurora is so limited in it’s air to air capability.

That is not what it was designed to do.
 
This is a little unrelated to the current topic of conversation, but does anyone know why the Harry DeWolf class is so limited in its ASW capabilities? I get it's an OPS, but it could stand to have something to counter submarines besides that helicopter.
As SeaKingTacco said, it is not the role of the AOPS to be a combatant, let alone a specialized combatant for anti-submarine warfare. They have a containerized TRAPS systems lets the ship do some limited underwater sensor work but its very much a bolt on capability that the ship has no way to effectively utilize. As far as I am aware, the ships do not have all of the equipment required to fully operate Cyclones properly and the AOPS do not have torpedo magazines, meaning you would need to refit/cludge capability onto the ship just to get some baseline usability. From what I understand as well, trying to do ASW in the Arctic can be a difficult job even for purpose built warships. At the end of the day, it is a 6,600t non-combatant designed to do patrol work inside and outside of the Arctic. It has no dedicated underwater sensor suite, it has no sound dampening aboard, can't operate Cyclones properly in its current state and is built to civilian standards. About all you can hope for AOPS to do if it encounters a submarine is cry for help and pray.

Trying to incorporate more capability for combat roles into the design (especially ASW) would have been at odds with its mission and would have actively detracted from it.
 
As SeaKingTacco said, it is not the role of the AOPS to be a combatant, let alone a specialized combatant for anti-submarine warfare. They have a containerized TRAPS systems lets the ship do some limited underwater sensor work but its very much a bolt on capability that the ship has no way to effectively utilize. As far as I am aware, the ships do not have all of the equipment required to fully operate Cyclones properly and the AOPS do not have torpedo magazines, meaning you would need to refit/cludge capability onto the ship just to get some baseline usability. From what I understand as well, trying to do ASW in the Arctic can be a difficult job even for purpose built warships. At the end of the day, it is a 6,600t non-combatant designed to do patrol work inside and outside of the Arctic. It has no dedicated underwater sensor suite, it has no sound dampening aboard, can't operate Cyclones properly in its current state and is built to civilian standards. About all you can hope for AOPS to do if it encounters a submarine is cry for help and pray.

Trying to incorporate more capability for combat roles into the design (especially ASW) would have been at odds with its mission and would have actively detracted from it.
I would liken the AOPS as a Ford 650 Work truck that has a rather surprising Ice strengthened capability and carry's a robust communication suite with a shotgun at the rear of the cab. Having said that even Paul Blart had SOME success.
 
Has there been any news on HMCS Robert Hampton Gray's construction? I saw Irving posted back in August of last year showing how they first cut steel but I haven't seen anything about keel laying or module production ongoing. It very much seems like the current AOPS program and its last two CCG variants (still not named strangely) schedule is going to clash with the planned 2024 start of CSC production. Last I heard, the 7th AOPS (first CCG variant) was supposed to start construction sometime this summer.
 
Some misc AOPS news from the Irving Shipbuilding twitter:

- All three mega blocks of HMCS Frédérick Rolette are in the module hall. Propeller shafts are being installed into the stern tubes, followed by the installation of the rudders and propeller blades onto the stern mega block. Following this, all three blocks will be rolled out onto land level to eventually start being put together in August 2023.

F0saOc6acAACjEF


F1_FZviWYAAQmM4


- HMCS William Hall has departed Halifax on July 27th to begin sea trials.

F2EGQR8XgAEhAA9


- AOPS 7, the currently unnamed first CCG AOPS variant, is on track for having steel cut sometime in August 2023.
 
Just an aside: Has anyone developed the ship's crest for William Hall?
 
Just an aside: Has anyone developed the ship's crest for William Hall?

As dapaterson said, nothing has been updated yet. I would hope it is under development currently as the ship is getting closer and closer to being accepted into service. If we go off the first three ships crests though, I think you can fairly accurately speculate on what William Hall's might be.

7-53_HMCSHarryDeWolf_ARMS.jpg


The wolf is a canting reference to the surname of Vice-Admiral Harry DeWolf (1903-2000). The sword indicates his status as an officer and a warrior. The shield evokes protection and displays the traditional insignia of a vice-admiral, a cross of St. George with a red disc in the upper left corner. The white background represents the icy waters of the Arctic.

7-245_HMCSMargaretBrooke_Arms.jpg


The caribou refers to the SS Caribou, the ferry on which Sub-Lieutenant Margaret Brooke, a nurse serving with the Royal Canadian Navy, was travelling when it was torpedoed by a U-Boat in 1942. Brooke was honoured for her bravery in attempting to save the life of her colleague Sub-Lieutenant Agnes Wilkie. The four-leaf clover was a good-luck charm carried by Brooke during the ordeal. The shield symbolizes protection, and its colours, green and yellow, are those of Saskatchewan, Margaret Brooke’s home province. The border of the shield alludes to the deep pink ribbon of the Order of the British Empire, of which Brooke was made a Member in recognition of her bravery. The white background refers to the Arctic environment in which HMCS Margaret Brooke will operate.

7-246_HMCSMaxBernays_Arms.jpg


The ship’s wheel represents the courage of Acting Chief Petty Officer Max Bernays in remaining at the helm of HMCS Assiniboine while under surface gun attack by a U Boat in 1942, during which time the bridge and wheelhouse were surrounded by flames, represented here by the red colour. The laurel wreath appears in the Conspicuous Gallantry Medal awarded to Bernays, as well as in the hat badge he wore as an Acting Chief Petty Officer. The white and blue are the colours of the ribbon of the Conspicuous Gallantry Medal. The white background also refers to the Arctic environment in which HMCS Max Bernays will operate.

Taking the previous three into consideration, I'm going to guess that William Hall's crest will have a white background and a notable symbol from his life. I would wager that it will be a cannon, considering Hall won his Victoria Cross at the Siege of Lucknow by almost single handedly manning a 24 pounder cannon through the losses to his fellow men, eventually breaching the wall of an important enemy fortification. It might also work in something to do with the Victoria Cross he won, using its lion, crown or the cross itself as a part of the crest.

Hopefully it will be revealed soon, I hope Robert Hampton Gray's crest will include a F4U Corsair.
 
Hopefully it will be revealed soon, I hope Robert Hampton Gray's crest will include a F4U Corsair.

The use of the physical aircraft is a 50/50 chance in my eyes, but something alluding to the F4U might be used, like the California rockfish (AKA the corsair) which was the namesake of submarine USS Corsair (SS 435) of the Tench-class.
 
The use of the physical aircraft is a 50/50 chance in my eyes, but something alluding to the F4U might be used, like the California rockfish (AKA the corsair) which was the namesake of submarine USS Corsair (SS 435) of the Tench-class.
Or, even simpler, incorporate the roundel that the RN (which he was in) used.

Alternately, some aspect(s) in the former crest of 1841 Naval Air Sqn:

1690651891077.png
 

After ten months of an operational hiatus for necessary repairs and extensive sailor training, His Majesty’s Canadian Ship (HMCS) Harry DeWolf and its crew is gearing up to head out to sea in August.

“From a ship driver perspective, this drives nothing like anything I’ve driven in the last thirty years,” said the ship’s Commander (Cdr), Guillaume Côté. “It’s completely different. Everyone aboard, including myself, have to learn how to operate such a large ship.”

For Cdr Côté the most daunting feat is operating a vessel of Harry DeWolf’s size. More familiar with operating the Halifax-class frigates, Cdr Côté describes vessels like the Kingston-class Marine Coastal Defence Vessels as comparable to driving a sports car. Harry DeWolf on the other hand, weighing about 7,000 tonnes with a diesel-electric motor, drives more like an 18-wheeler.

This reality requires more Marine Technicians (MARTECH) aboard who bring a collective knowledge of the Navy’s technical trades and an openness to taking on new challenges.

“There’s an entire development process to change the skillsets of every single sailor serving in this ship,” Cdr Côté said. “They have to take what they have learned or what they know and apply it in a different way.”

Until mid-July the crew of 87 sailors was focused solely on training, earning qualifications, and gaining experience to be best prepared for future deployments.

Despite the lengthy training for personnel, Cdr Côté himself is bracing for the new adventure of sailing in the arctic.

“It’s a daunting task, sailing that farup North. I’m not too sure how to prepare myself emotionally, psychologically, operationally for this,” he said. “This is going to be a complete change.”

The upcoming deployment on Operation Nanook is an exercise of Canadian sovereignty in the arctic region. It’s a joint effort coordinated with our northern partners that helps respond to security issues in the North. Cdr Côté says Harry DeWolf will be the only Canadian navy vessel participating in the operation this year, collaborating, and conducting exercises with the Canadian Coast Guard, the United States Navy, the United States Coast Guard, and other national and international partners to improve the Navy’s ability to operate in the unique environment.

Cdr Côté also noted this operation is not only important to demonstrate Canada’s presence in our territorial waters, but for sailors to experience sailing in the arctic.

“The Royal Canadian Navy (RCN) has limited knowledge and experience in our own backyard,” said Cdr Côté. “So, every time we go up there, we learn new things.”

The significance of Harry DeWolf’s presence in more isolated regions and untouched natural environments is not lost on the ship’s Commanding Officer or ships company. He says climate change is top of mind and they are all prepared to uphold the RCN’s mandate to reduce environmental impacts.

“With climate change things are constantly shifting,” he said. “What was once rock is just mud, coastlines are changing with erosion, so there’s a bit of survey work, but we are a self-sustaining unit. We are trying to have as little negative impact on the local communities, and on the environment.”

Beyond the challenges that Op Nanook may bring, Cdr Côté is eager to head out to sea with his skilled and talented crew.

“We’re just starting this journey of discovery and we are really looking forward to that challenge,” he said. “Over.”
 
Back
Top