• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

A letter from a US Army Major

legalrec

New Member
Inactive
Reaction score
0
Points
110
I'm not overly familiar with the Officer Separation Board, but this appears to be merely a method of cutting the fat.  I would think that there are officers with lesser offenses that are also subjected to the Officer Separation Board.  He is claiming that he has been fired, so I'm hoping someone can clarify this.  Was he actually fired or merely set up for early and involuntary retirement?

http://ricks.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2014/08/07/a_letter_from_a_major_fired_by_the_army?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_term=Flashpoints&utm_campaign=2014_FlashPoints%20%28Manual%29

This letter arrived this morning. I am running it with the author's permission:

My name is Major Charles V. Slider III and I am currently stationed at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. I am an African-American armor officer, proud father, and husband and graduate of Lincoln University in Jefferson City, Missouri. I was selected for the recently convened Officer Separation Boards for the Department of the Army for a mistake over eight years ago. The mistake was a DUI in which I received a General Officer Memorandum for Record in 2006. Since this incident, I strived for excellence in every job that I performed.

I trained soldiers for deployments to Iraq as part of the surge into theater from 2006-2008. From 2008-2011, I attended and completed Ranger School, Air Assault School and earned the Expert Infantryman Badge. I commanded troops in combat in Afghanistan where I earned the Bronze Star Medal, Army Commendation Medal for Valor, and the Purple Heart for actions against a determined enemy in RC East. After the deployment, I was selected as the executive officer for the deputy commander for the Combined Arms Center of Training at Fort Leavenworth serving in the capacity as the daily assistant for a general officer. The following year I was selected among a field of majors to attend the Commanding General and Staff Officer College at Fort Leavenworth, as well as the school of advanced military studies. Both prestigious institutes serve as the educational nexus for field-grade officers. Upon graduating from SAMS in May 2014, I was notified that I would not receive an assignment due to being assessed as high risk the GOMAR in my restricted file.

On August 1, I was notified of my removal from active duty service. Although I accept this fate, this is not justifiable due to the sacrifices that both my family and I have endured.

As a resident ILE/SAMS graduate, my interpretation of this entire process is that it involved no critical thinking about the types of officers maintained in the current military structure. In certain cases, specific skills, attributes, and character traits are required in order to provide a balance of the warrior scholar. To this end the board process chose individuals for elimination that met all of the requirements, but possessed one black mark. Instead of using judgment and common sense in determining the number of officers required for service, an arbitrary number was provided. This created a system in which officers were selected based on a mistake rather than their overall contribution to the Army. One lapse in judgment does not constitute a pattern of misconduct, nor a judgment of overall character. These types of decisions knee-jerk reactions within the Army have the potential to erode trust within the lower ranks.

As an officer, I believe that we should be judged on our body of work, not one isolated incident. Furthermore, this act to remove me from service serves as a blunt example of how stoic and regimented the board process is as a system. As a Purple Heart recipient and proud member of the service, my family and I have given the Army our never-ending faith and commitment. However, the Army has seen it fit to remove my services as an officer from its ranks. Although the details of the board instructions will remain hidden, this also serves as ironclad proof that these awards are merely a method to provide credibility to a force that has integrity issues and morally barren for true sacrifices. This letter is an attempt to highlight the issues residing within an unfair system and to provide context to others within the system. As a combat veteran of two theaters, Iraq and Afghanistan, I do not expect to be treated differently or to receive any sort of pat on the back. However, my actions after 2006 prove my family's enduring faith to an ever-evolving conflict and requirements to serve. I have served this great nation with distinction and honor and deserve a valid explanation of why its leaders choose to remove my services from the American people. I accomplished every mission presented to and went above and beyond what is expected of an Army officer. I hope that this letter finds you in good faith.

Very respectfully,
MAJ Charles V. Slider
 
Tough luck.Based on the story I can only draw the conclusion that he was an average to below average officer.His boss could have kept him from being boarded IMO.
I would suggest reading the comments.Its instructive.
 
Not to take this thread on a different tangent, but I find it odd, or even curious, that he would feel the need to describe himself as an "African American armor officer".
 
Transporter said:
Not to take this thread on a different tangent, but I find it odd, or even curious, that he would feel the need to describe himself as an "African American armor officer".

Might be trying to stir up something that isn't there...
 
tomahawk6 said:
I would suggest reading the comments. Its instructive.

Indeed.  And I agree with the majority of respondents.  In comparison to/competition with an officer of he same occupation with equal experience and qualifications who did not have a "lapse in judgement", he never stood a chance.
 
Transporter said:
Not to take this thread on a different tangent, but I find it odd, or even curious, that he would feel the need to describe himself as an "African American armor officer."

Highlighted portion of your pullquote which shows the individual's predilection for excellence.
 
Shamrock said:
Highlighted portion of your pullquote which shows the individual's predilection for excellence.
Yes, which is why he also highlighted "Ranger School, Air Assault School and earned the Expert Infantryman Badge," in the hopes of being thought of as a real solider.  >:D


I wasn't going to respond to the thread, but the black-hatter started it.  ;)



.....and yes bLUE fOX, that is the proper US spelling.  I'm guessing you're not particularly tall, since Shamrock's comment was apparently over your head.  ;D
 
Journeyman said:
Yes, which is why he also highlighted "Ranger School, Air Assault School and earned the Expert Infantryman Badge," in the hopes of being thought of as a real solider.  >:D


I wasn't going to respond to the thread, but the black-hatter started it.  ;)

One can always come from excellence and pursue mediocrity.  The true mark of a leader is how well he does at a staff posting.

...Right?
 
Journeyman said:
Yes, which is why he also highlighted "Ranger School, Air Assault School and earned the Expert Infantryman Badge," in the hopes of being thought of as a real solider.  >:D


I wasn't going to respond to the thread, but the black-hatter started it.  ;)



.....and yes bLUE fOX, that is the proper US spelling.  I'm guessing you're not particularly tall, since Shamrock's comment was apparently over your head.  ;D

Shy of some sort of trade bashing, I'd be lying if I said I see the joke.
 
His laundry list of deployments, courses, and awards is pretty typical for a US army O-3/O-4.  Even orderly room clerks in Kabul were given Bronze Stars on departure.

I recently witnessed a USAF Maj that was given his pink slip as well, despite being a "good guy" with all the right boxes checked. That's a consequence with a large, "up-or-out" force.
 
The first mistake this guy made was thinking the "system" actually gave a crap about the quality of his work.  His bosses gave a crap but the system..... not a chance.  His name ended up on some excel spreadsheet in the Pentagon and his DUI placed him on the lower end of the table. 

He should quit feeling sorry for himself and start developing a good exit strategy.
 
I think that over the next 12 months or so, there will be much more of this sort of thing (pink slips) and a whole bunch more will be offered early-out packages (think FRP). The federal civil service within the US DoD will also downsize significantly, mostly achieved through attrition, hiring freezes and widespread early retirement offers for those at the upper end of their careers.

I know a couple of guys who have gotten thanks-for-coming-out-but-your-services-are-no-longer-required letters. Thankfully, we haven't had to resort to that (as tempting as it might be for select cases... but I digress).
 
RoyalDrew said:
The first mistake this guy made was thinking the "system" actually gave a crap about the quality of his work.  His bosses gave a crap but the system..... not a chance.  His name ended up on some excel spreadsheet in the Pentagon and his DUI placed him on the lower end of the table. 

He should quit feeling sorry for himself and start developing a good exit strategy.

He went for a tactical sympathy vote, but likely harmed his position strategically, in that once you put something on the internet, well...it's on the internet.  Future employers may wonder about the whiney tone and also the DUI, as they consider whether he would make a good member on their team...

 
Good2Golf said:
He went for a tactical sympathy vote, but likely harmed his position strategically, in that once you put something on the internet, well...it's on the internet.  Future employers may wonder about the whiney tone and also the DUI, as they consider whether he would make a good member on their team...

This is exactly what I thought. This letter is hardly going to make anyone change their mind and now he's going to be in a challenging position to get a good civilian job. I do recruiting for my firm and if I came across a letter like this for an applicant, I would immediately pass. It's one thing if this letter were addressed to future employers, but it feels whiney as an open letter.
 
Transporter said:
I know a couple of guys who have gotten thanks-for-coming-out-but-your-services-are-no-longer-required letters. Thankfully, we haven't had to resort to that (as tempting as it might be for select cases... but I digress).

We started doing this to CWOs/CPO1s who were not deemed suitable for Key Positions, Senior Appointments, CFR or SRCP.
 
Haggis said:
We started doing this to CWOs/CPO1s who were not deemed suitable for Key Positions, Senior Appointments, CFR or SRCP.

If I recall, weren't they required to be 55 yrs of age with at least 35 yrs of service? Same was done for Cols I believe.
 
Transporter said:
If I recall, weren't they required to be 55 yrs of age with at least 35 yrs of service? Same was done for Cols I believe.

In most cases, yes.  There were, I heard, some exceptions who received letters earlier.
 
Met a 35 year old British RSM.  Those guys were saying if someone doesn't reach a certain rank by a certain age they get switched over to some non combat type admin  job.
 
Back
Top