Refs: A. 5225-1 (DMCA) 21 Sep 11
B. DDP 3.01 (Ammendment #46)
Ref A clearly defined the arcs on review of release items by former members. Ref B (and any IPSC should have that on hand) provides clear explanations of the new policy.
Basically put, once a member has released from the CF, their actual Release Category will not be changed. Should there exist on their pers file and/or med docs, information that proves their injury/illness is the result of service, and they would not have met Universality of Service at the time of their release, their Release Category can only be annotated 'Disabled' (i.e. 4(c)-Disabled).
Clear as mud?
Really. I was released 5A and then annotated 5A-disabled 6 months post release. The CAF knowing full well of my medical situation TCAT and PCAT. I had surgery 5 weeks before release and I am not considered disabled? I have artificial parts in me.
Wow seems worthy of a lawsuit. It's like being dumped at the side of the road and told good luck sucker. VAC reviewed and gave me a lump. I am in worse shape than before. Filing for consequential injury.
So your claiming I cannot contest the clear establishment of not satisfying U of S and being released injured in spite of CRA?