Infanteer said:
The Aussies have said no and relegated para insert to their SOF. Proponents point to Op SERVAL, and the French insertions into Mali.
I'm trying to find into about the Airborne component of that op. Was it a massed static line drop?
If yes was using an Airborne insertion like that a huge advantage?
I understand about the problems with losing a capability and trying to bring it back but a company minus of light Airborne forces, without reading about that op, doesn't seem like a huge advantage to me still. Especially in Canada where I think to deploy a jump company the battalion with need to drag over troops and NCOs from other companies. Not to mention our chutes are pretty brutal for taking our own guys out (see Mattawa massacre).
If we do keep an Airborne capability I think we need new chutes.
Urban ops is something any force should do - if Fallujah taught us anything, its that mech/armoured forces have a critical role in the urban environment. Recce is a pan-Infantry function. Same with force pro.
Mountain operations is a feasible concept.
For sure everyone should be able to do urban ops but unless it's a training cycles priority it's easy for skill fade to kick in. What I was picting was a specialist company that can deploy in support of other units deploying from company down to section level to act as urban ops instructors/advisors/experts at the smaller sizes and mission specific force at Pl and coy.
If 1ppcli is deploying to a company or two to Africa then they would bring a platoon of dedicated urban ops guys.
The same theory for a recce coy, mountain coy, FP platoon.
I guess what I'm trying to say is I don't see light infantry battalions fighting as a battalion in a traditional battlefield role anymore.
3rd battalion dug in a defensive? I've seen how that ends a bunch of times ;D
Have them act as force multipliers and support other deployed units.