The really funny part? The two countries most affected are: Russia and China.Houthis are going to end up firmly into Hamas' find out phase pretty soon. You don't mess with international shipping.
"Wait, wait, wait...hang on you guys, we overlooked something...come back to the jetty while we think on this some more..."The really funny part? The two countries most affected are: Russia and China.
Russia can’t get oil to market in Asia and China can’t get goods to market in Europe and Eastern North America….
Kill the munition, but not the firing point?Rumor on the Twittersphere is that the Coalition is crumbling as the RoE placed by the USN is too limiting for some nations.
Which doesn’t surprise me, as it has been a poorly kept secret that we don’t want to create a war (expand it) in the region.
Doubtful, the Houthis kicked the asses of the Saudis and the Arab coalition for years... they've got a 1 million + men at arms and they know how to fight.Houthis are going to end up firmly into Hamas' find out phase pretty soon. You don't mess with international shipping.
Kill the munition, but not the firing point?
Too bad Missouri and Wisconsin were finally mothballed for good.
They can’t attack if they are dead…
And remember....
We can take them on but they can hurt us real bad....
I'd think that if the decision were to be made to go after Houthi launch sites/command centres/weapons storage facilities that it would include air strikes in addition to ship launched weapons.Thing is, the Houthis have zero need to defeat the U.S. militarily. It’s sufficient that Lloyds of London perceives enough risk to shipping that the sea route is made economically non-viable due to exorbitant insurance costs versus route profitability.
Naval vessels have very finite magazine capacity and will always have to save some of the best stuff for their own self defense. I suspect their ability to defend shipping against drone swarms is pretty limited. Even a bunch of garbage rockets sent up with a limited number of ‘good’ munitions would draw fire and deplete munitions in the limited time the naval vessels would have to engage threats. And a lot of these platforms can be pretty small and launched from anywhere. We’re talking about a quite vulnerable ~30km x ~100km target box for shipping. Depending on Houthi weapon stocks, they may simply have far more rounds in the magazine than the USN.
I bet some people are sweating buckets rethinking air defense in the littoral environment given what Ukraine and Gaza have shown us about the ability to mass produce good enough weapons. I suspect we’ll see some more urgency out into developing ship borne and even airborne laser weapons.
EW and counter measures as well...Thing is, the Houthis have zero need to defeat the U.S. militarily. It’s sufficient that Lloyds of London perceives enough risk to shipping that the sea route is made economically non-viable due to exorbitant insurance costs versus route profitability.
Naval vessels have very finite magazine capacity and will always have to save some of the best stuff for their own self defense. I suspect their ability to defend shipping against drone swarms is pretty limited. Even a bunch of garbage rockets sent up with a limited number of ‘good’ munitions would draw fire and deplete munitions in the limited time the naval vessels would have to engage threats. And a lot of these platforms can be pretty small and launched from anywhere. We’re talking about a quite vulnerable ~30km x ~100km target box for shipping. Depending on Houthi weapon stocks, they may simply have far more rounds in the magazine than the USN.
I bet some people are sweating buckets rethinking air defense in the littoral environment given what Ukraine and Gaza have shown us about the ability to mass produce good enough weapons. I suspect we’ll see some more urgency out into developing ship borne and even airborne laser weapons.
You are an astute one MonsieurThing is, the Houthis have zero need to defeat the U.S. militarily. It’s sufficient that Lloyds of London perceives enough risk to shipping that the sea route is made economically non-viable due to exorbitant insurance costs versus route profitability.
Naval vessels have very finite magazine capacity and will always have to save some of the best stuff for their own self defense. I suspect their ability to defend shipping against drone swarms is pretty limited. Even a bunch of garbage rockets sent up with a limited number ‘good’ munitions would draw fire and deplete munitions in the limited time the naval vessels would have to engage threats. And a lot of these platforms can be pretty small and launched from anywhere. We’re talking about a quite vulnerable ~30km x ~100km target box for shipping. Depending on Houthi weapon stocks, they may simply have far more rounds in the magazine than the USN.
I bet some people are sweating buckets rethinking air defense in the littoral environment given what Ukraine and Gaza have shown us about the ability to mass produce good enough weapons. I suspect we’ll see some more urgency out into developing ship borne and even airborne laser weapons.
I wasn’t expecting “the US military not wanting to expend munitions” on my 2023 bingo card, but here we are.Rumor on the Twittersphere is that the Coalition is crumbling as the RoE placed by the USN is too limiting for some nations.
Obviously the answer is grapeshot.
Destroy wherever they are making these things.Obviously the answer is grapeshot.