Jammer said:CTV is running an intersting piece on it's website.
Petamocto said:Kind of hard for any of us to comment on this one...not exactly in our arcs.
recceguy said:Why is that?
Petamocto said:Because unless the CDS or MND posts regularly on this board, it's kind of hard for regular pongos like us to comment on international relations policy or NATO activities.
Flap Jack said:But we still have our opinions and can express how we feel about this particular subject.
Something to definitely keep in mind....next time we're sent to Iraq :nod:Petamocto said:It ends up hurting those we work for if every Corporal and Captain spouts off about what we think of NATO or why we should / should not be in Iraq.
Petamocto said:Sure, if you're a civilian viewing this board. If not, feel free to roll the dice and hope that your superiors don't post here.
No, we're not robots, and I'm not going to say anything like "the QM didn't issue me an opinion". However, the old adage of "You can comment if you've led it, fired it, or used it" is a good guide.
It ends up hurting those we work for if every Corporal and Captain spouts off about what we think of NATO or why we should / should not be in Iraq.
For years, Canada did less than the bare minimum for NATO, between an underfunded military and an undersized commitment to the Central Front. In the first Gulf War, Canada sent less than the bare minimum, providing very little to the fight. "We aren't equipped to fight that kind of war" said Joe Clark at the time, when responding to criticism of our meagre and paltry forces sent there. (I think that he forgot that the USSR and its Warsaw Pact allies had bigger armies that were much more capable than Saddam Hussein's). I think it's a bit early for us to criticise others for their less than bare minimum contribution in Afghanistan.Dennis Ruhl said:NATO was all about saving Europes backside. I'm sure the Europeans never intended that they would ever be called on to support the US.
recceguy said:I suggest you go way back and research the history of this board...The key is staying in your lanes... If not, don't waste space by making comments to make yourself heard or try to moderate discussion without the owners approval...
Petamocto said:Well obviously we're on the same page because you yourself said "The key is staying in your lanes". How in the heck can you do that as a soldier giving personal opinion on Canada's national policy?
Believe me, the last thing I am is a discussion stifler; I just think that if one is to give his opinion, it should be informed using the guidelines of "Have I led it, used it, been there, fired it, etc".
I'm not trying to be any sort of boogeyman, I just think it's strange that bending regulations (the military's, not this site's) would be encouraged.
zipperhead_cop said:Lets all wait and see who jumps on the Darfur train! ;D
Dennis Ruhl said:Don't even joke.
Jammer said:It's still a free country for now and I don't need the PAFFO's or IMOs permission.
My opinion.