- Reaction score
- 1,321
- Points
- 1,090
That makes it an easy solution - no need to involve our material movement system at all. Nothing to pull out of Depot....just hand a cheque to the US and they tack on 20K or ammo to their shipments heading over.
NYT should be investigated for ties to Russia... That editorial is disturbing to say the least.
It does seem to be going more than a bit isolationist, saying "whoa, guys, let's keep a grip on how much we help here." If the UKR fight is as bipartisan in the U.S. as many I respect say, this is moving the NYT ship away from that crowd, for sure. Also, while the editorial mentions food insecurity as a growing issue, it fails to mention this being part of the cause ....NYT should be investigated for ties to Russia... That editorial is disturbing to say the least.
That makes it an easy solution - no need to involve our material movement system at all. Nothing to pull out of Depot....just hand a cheque to the US and they tack on 20K or ammo to their shipments heading over.
That is what most folks do.If we have war stocks should we not send those and take the new stuff for ourselves lest ours expires. We know Ukraine will use the ammo in the near term. Also PJT can get nice pics of our C-17's delivering it.
We don’t have war stocks.If we have war stocks should we not send those and take the new stuff for ourselves lest ours expires. We know Ukraine will use the ammo in the near term. Also PJT can get nice pics of our C-17's delivering it.
You may want to tack on another 20k for a weeks worth of War Stock…We don’t have war stocks.
If we think the next war might be against a modern enemy then (judging from the still ongoing fight in Ukraine) I think we might need more than a week of supplies in the go locker. NATO has defined a number of days that a nation should look after itself before collective logistics kicks in. We need to cover at least those many days.You may want to tack on another 20k for a weeks worth of War Stock…
To be honest, the only part really, where I depart from what Soros is saying, is where he talks about the Politburo, as though it exists in any meaningful fashion…which I don’t believe it does anymore, in the sense of the USSR 1.0 back room running things behind the Premier frontman.With this guy in Ukraine's corner, wonder how many on-the-fencers are going to lean pro-Team USSR 2.0 now?
![]()
Billionaire Soros links Ukraine, WWIII
Billionaire financier George Soros says Russia's invasion of Ukraine may have been the beginning of World War III so the best way to preserve free civilisation was to defeat President Vladimir Putin's forces.Soros, 91, a legendary hedge fund manager who earned fame by betting against the British...au.news.yahoo.com
Agreed on the "USSR 1.0 nostalgic cohort", but you know how some people can be - if x is for it, I can't be anything but against it.To be honest, the only part really, where I depart from what Soros is saying, is where he talks about the Politburo, as though it exists in any meaningful fashion…which I don’t believe it does anymore, in the sense of the USSR 1.0 back room running things behind the Premier frontman.
Many (not I) use the same argument about our defence spending. It might be that they view their proximity to the UK like many Canadians view our proximity to the US.Out of curiosity, defend them from what? What military threat does Ireland feel it faces?
To complicated. Just buy stuff and send it. CAF ammo expenditures are carefully tracked and used. Do you really want to get bureaucratic with this? The more steps the more complications.If we have war stocks should we not send those and take the new stuff for ourselves lest ours expires. We know Ukraine will use the ammo in the near term. Also PJT can get nice pics of our C-17's delivering it.
That is what most folks do.
Logistically it is easy to just write us a check.
But from a long term standpoint- it makes sense to get rid of the older ammo and bring in new. Mind you 20k rounds go pretty quick
I know the media has focused heavily on Ukranian wins against Russian forces, the retaking of towns/villages/cities, regaining control of areas, pushing Russian forces back, completely disrupting their ability to resupply & maneuver, sinking of Russian ships, etcWith this guy in Ukraine's corner, wonder how many on-the-fencers are going to lean pro-Team USSR 2.0 now?
![]()
Billionaire Soros links Ukraine, WWIII
Billionaire financier George Soros says Russia's invasion of Ukraine may have been the beginning of World War III so the best way to preserve free civilisation was to defeat President Vladimir Putin's forces.Soros, 91, a legendary hedge fund manager who earned fame by betting against the British...au.news.yahoo.com
Remember, it was the NY Times that supported Durante in the 1920-30’s and his constant blathering about Stalin and how he was changing the world and the outright denial of the man-made famine in the Ukraine. Looks like history repeating itself again.NYT should be investigated for ties to Russia... That editorial is disturbing to say the least.
Very last paragraph of that KI article, their words describing exactly how I feel about this whole thing: Ukraine is fighting this war on behalf of the free world – to make sure it remains free. The free world must at least try to match the Ukrainians’ bravery.
When you’ve got only 40 guns, it can take a bit of time to go through 20,000 rounds…..well I guess 5 days if all 40 guns fire 100/day.That is what most folks do.
Logistically it is easy to just write us a check.
But from a long term standpoint- it makes sense to get rid of the older ammo and bring in new. Mind you 20k rounds go pretty quick
When you’ve got only 40 guns, it can take a bit of time to go through 20,000 rounds…..well I guess 5 days if all 40 guns fire 100/day.