- Reaction score
- 19,122
- Points
- 1,260
Elon scrubbed that one.
Meanwhile Russia ‘strangely’ has recruitment issues.
So they inject about 20k mobilized a month and lose about 20k KIA a month, plus WIA of probably 20k as well. Sounds like a fantastic way to run a war, sorry sPeCuL MiLitArE OpeRaShun![]()
If this report from the German News Agency is true, there will be interest from the habitually poorer regions of Russia based on the some of theMeanwhile Russia ‘strangely’ has recruitment issues.
So they inject about 20k mobilized a month and lose about 20k KIA a month, plus WIA of probably 20k as well. Sounds like a fantastic way to run a war, sorry sPeCuL MiLitArE OpeRaShun![]()
Right now the F-16 numbers are limited. We (USA) aren’t offering any of our that are sitting in storage. So the Grippen offers more airframes.It appears that the F16 is finally on its way to the warzone so why are they talking about Gripens. wouldn't adding a second major type simply add complexity without significant benefit? the two a/c appear to share similar duties
Except the Gripen is easier to service . Little things like no need for mobile work platforms as most components of the Gripen can be reached from the ground. Sweden built into and regularly practices Highway operations for the Gripen. The F -16 CAN take off from highways but needs some Paris Hilton care when doing so.It appears that the F16 is finally on its way to the warzone so why are they talking about Gripens. wouldn't adding a second major type simply add complexity without significant benefit? the two a/c appear to share similar duties
Once again the US trading UA lives for Russian attrition with no plan how to deal with Russia as a failed stateRight now the F-16 numbers are limited. We (USA) aren’t offering any of our that are sitting in storage. So the Grippen offers more airframes.
why is it up to the US? Theres nothing stopping other nations from stepping up. What have we done lately?Once again the US trading UA lives for Russian attrition with no plan how to deal with Russia as a failed state
Grippen was always the best choice for Ukraine. The F16's advantage was the perceived number of airframes available and the pool of potential International Legion pilots and maintainers.Except the Gripen is easier to service . Little things like no need for mobile work platforms as most components of the Gripen can be reached from the ground. Sweden built into and regularly practices Highway operations for the Gripen. The F -16 CAN take off from highways but needs some Paris Hilton care when doing so.
Convened something or other and made vague statements that mean little. The most usefull/substantial aid has come from the Ukrainian diaspora in Canada and other private citizens.why is it up to the US? Theres nothing stopping other nations from stepping up. What have we done lately?
A significant amount of military equipment and materiel is US sourced, or US IP. Either way, end user certifications mean the US controls its disposition.why is it up to the US? Theres nothing stopping other nations from stepping up. What have we done lately?
Arguably Russia has been a failed state for some time. Dealing with it is really a European concern because its reach is no longer as world wide as it was. All that the US has been doing and needs to do is help Europe grow a spine.Once again the US trading UA lives for Russian attrition with no plan how to deal with Russia as a failed state
As with many/most things, even when the US does more than anyone else (military support to Ukraine, foreign aid, disaster relief, UN funding, etc.) there are always complaints that they're not doing enough.A significant amount of military equipment and materiel is US sourced, or US IP. Either way, end user certifications mean the US controls its disposition.
I think you misunderstand the U.S.'s end game here. Some U.S. government officials don't want Ukraine to win, they want the war to wage on as long as possible because they are beholden to the arms makers. They also don't want Russia to fail completely because then the DND does not have to arm against the Russian threat.Grippen was always the best choice for Ukraine. The F16's advantage was the perceived number of airframes available and the pool of potential International Legion pilots and maintainers.
Which has proven to be illusionary with the US dangling them as a carrot and paternalistically still thinking they know best how Ukraine should fight The Russians despite a stunning number of intelligence/analysis misreads and ZERO actual experience in the type of combat now occurring.