• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The Baltics and Russia

Kirkhill

Fair Scunnert WASP.
Subscriber
Donor
Reaction score
7,296
Points
1,160
Sweden engaged in Multinational Exercises in Sweden..... This is new.  Link

B-52 Bombers to Exercise Over Sweden

(Source: Radio Sweden; published May 20, 2015)

In the coming month, Sweden will take part in two big international military exercises. What is new, reports news agency TT, is that the Armed Forces openly say that one of the purposes with this is to "send a security political signal".

Starting next Monday, Sweden takes place in the airborne Arctic Challenge Exercise together with eight countries, the US and Germany among them. This will turn large parts of northern Sweden from Umeå and up, TT writes, into a gigantic training ground.

And in the beginning of June, the Nato-led marine exercise Baltops, will take place in the Baltic Sea.

At a press briefing on Wednesday, major general Karl Engelbrektson told reporters that both exercises are bigger and more complex than their predecessors.

"The main objective is to increase the different operative capabilities, but also to send clear security political signals that we do these things together with others," he said.

TT: How would you want Russia to interpret these exercises?

"Primarily, we want to send a signal about how we understand the mission that the Armed Forces has been given and how Sweden understands its mission. And that is that we will exercise and increase our security together with others. How Russia interprets that, they can decide for themselves," Karl Engelbrektson said.


Jacob Westberg, lecturer in security policy and strategy at the Swedish Defence University, told TT that - as far as he can tell - it is news that the Armed Forces is specifically sending out political signals. "I am guessing that the signal is aiming to say that Sweden will not give in to the kind of scare tactics that part of Russia's actions can be interpreted as, such as the violation of our air space," he said.

The most spectacular part of these exercises will take place on the 13th of June, when two American B-52 bombers will be flying from the US and simulate dropping naval mines outside Ravlunda on the Swedish east coast.

After the mission, which is supposed to simulate the defence of the coast when it is attacked by an amphibious operation, the bombers will return to the US without any stop-overs.

"People in the area will be able to hear it," said Karl Engelbrektson about the exercise.

The go-ahead for these exercises will be decided upon in parliament on Thursday. According to the tabloid Expressen, the Green Party's foreign policy spokesperson Valter Mutt and the leader of the Left Party, Jonas Sjöstedt are against allowing American B-52's to exercise over Swedish territory for the first time.

-ends-

Meanwhile Finland is Updating their Call-Out  procedures. Link

900,000 letters sent out to secure 253,000 reservists at notice to move....

UUTISET
NEWS
News 9.4.2015 19:11 | updated 9.4.2015 20:01
Defence Minister: Call up letters unrelated to Ukraine crisis
Defence Minister Carl Haglund says that call up letters due to go out to reservists in May have nothing to do with the crisis in Ukraine or tense relations between neighbouring Russia and the European Union. Haglund was responding to reports on plans by Finnish Defence Forces to mail out the letters to nearly one million reservists.


Puolustusministeri Carl Haglund.
Defence Minister Carl Haglund swept aside speculation about the call-up letters to be sent to reservists. Image: Roni Rekomaa / Lehtikuva
The decision by the Defence Forces to issue call-up letters to some 900,000 reservists caused many to wonder about the reason behind the apparent call to muster.

On Thursday Defence Minister Carl Haglund swept aside concerns that the roll call could be linked to increasing tensions in the region. He said that a decision had been taken to distribute the letters well before the outbreak of violence in Ukraine.

“This mailing took shape back in 2010 a long time before the crisis in Ukraine. In 20013 a decision was made to send this kind of letter immediately after the defence force reform,” Haglund explained.

Haglund said that the mailout was also inspired by reservists’ interest in the Defence Forces.

“Many reservists are interested in what kinds of assignments they will have and they are motivated to participate in national defence work. Because of that it’s good to be able to provide them with regular updates on what has been planned,” he added.

Haglund sidestepped the question of what kind of message the call-up letters might send to parties abroad, nor would he be drawn on how Russia might react to the move.

“There is no intention to send any message,” Haglund observed.

Letters to all reservists in May

Yle reported on Thursday that the Defence Forces plans to send call-up letters to all reservists in May. The purpose of the communication is to help update reservists’ personal data, provide information about their roles and to test the integrity of the conscript register.

According to the Defence Forces a working group led by F-Secure chairman Risto Siilasmaa in 2010 recommended better communication with reservists, following which it was decided in 2013 to send out the letters.

However the plan was not implemented until this year, following the conclusion of a defence forces reform programme.

The Finnish military has begun sending letters to some 900,000 reservists amid increased tensions between the Nordic states and Russia over the Ukraine crisis.

Russia and Finland share a 1,340-kilometer land border.

The military said the letter campaign, which started on May 4, was prompted mainly by cuts in the defense budget.

Finland's defense budget this year has shrunk to 2.7 billion euros ($2.99 billion), or 1.29 percent of GDP, down from 1.4 percent in 2012.

The letters reportedly informed reservists what their role would be in a "crisis situation."

Finland, with a population of 5.2 million, is one of few countries in Europe still to have compulsory military service for men. It has a professional army of 16,000, but in the event of mobilization, it could muster a 230,000-strong force.

Last month, neutral Finland and Sweden joined with NATO members Norway, Denmark, and Iceland in a joint statement that directly cited the Russian "challenge" as grounds to boost defense cooperation.

Link

Things heating up - aerial near misses, submarine contacts and depth charging in Swedish and Finnish waters.....
 
Funny you should post this - I just spotted this this week, shared under the Fair Dealing provisions of the Copyright Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-42) ....
Thousands of ordinary civilians, including doctors, carpenters and teachers, are flocking to join volunteer paramilitary groups in several European countries, with some doubling in size since the start of the Ukraine crisis, Newsweek has discovered.

In Estonia, Lithuania, Sweden and Poland, volunteer defence leagues, many of whom train with real weapons and would be called upon to support the army in the event of a conflict, are seeing record numbers of ordinary civilians joining up.

Finland's military sent out letters to all 900,000 of its former conscripts at the beginning of this month, informing them of what their roles would be in a "crisis situation". Earlier this year, the Polish parliamentary speaker announced that parliamentarians will be offered the opportunity to train at an army firing range and that though the cut off age for the Polish military is 50, there would be exceptions for "healthy and youthful-looking" MPs.

So concerned are Russia's neighbours that last week military chiefs from Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia are to deliver a formal request to Nato, appealing for the alliance to base thousands of troops in the Baltic states, a further sign of the ongoing tension between Russia and West. Lieutenant-General Riho Terras, commander-in-chief of the Estonian defence forces, told the Times newspaper that "every Baltic state would have a battalion - say, one battalion in Poland and one in each of the Baltic states."

Since the beginning of the violence in Ukraine, the Lithuanian Riflemen's Union (LRU), the country's main paramilitary organisation, first set up in 1919, has grown from 6,000 members to 8,000 members.

The group uses real combat weapons and consists of 10 regiments who are spread across the country and who train every weekend, usually at military bases.

"The correlation between Russian aggression and LRU popularity is clear," says Valdas Kilpys, a rifleman and journalist for the LRU's journal. "We live here and we don't want anybody to decide how we should live. We are proud of what we have achieved in the last 25 years. No one can take it away from us," he says.

Across the border in Poland, it is estimated that the country's volunteer paramilitary groups boast 10,000 members. Earlier this year, the defence minister Tomasz Siemoniak announced that 2,500 volunteers would form the backbone of volunteer units to be mobilized in the event of a war, and be paid a wage, marking the first time Poland has given these volunteer paramilitary groups official recognition.

It is a similar story in Estonia. According to Silva Kiili, a research fellow at Tallinn's International Centre for Defence and Security, the size of the Estonian Defence League has doubled in comparison to pre-Ukraine crisis levels. In 2014 alone, more than 1,000 new volunteers joined, and the total figure now stands at over 24,000, out of a total population of 1.2m.

"People were joining before the crisis. But the Russian aggression has urged people to re-evaluate their priorities and many who were considering, but postponed, have now made up their minds and joined," she says.

The organisation uses real weapons and Defence League members are "ready and willing to fight in a conflict to defend their country", according to Kiili. "As the Defence League members have their battle gear and weapons at home they can be rapidly activated and may act as first responders to any kind of challenges including foreign aggression," she continues.

The average age of new members is 30, the majority of whom are newly married, with children and who have higher education, says Kiili.

According to Colonel Ilmar Damm, chief of staff of the Estonian Defence League many of those who join do so because they have "new values they want to protect",

"EDL is the backbone for preserving sovereignty and independence in Estonia," he continues. "People are asking more questions about how they can contribute."

The Swedish Home Guard, part of the Swedish Armed Forces, is also growing in popularity and now boasts more than 21,200 members, from all professions, including doctors, teachers, carpenters and bus drivers, according to Anette Sällström of the Swedish Armed Forces.

In 2013, the Swedish Home Guard received 1,500 expressions of interest in joining and during 2014, that figure doubled. According to Sällström, this is partly due to the crisis in Ukraine, but also the lure of modern and accurate equipment and the crisis in Syria, which could be other factors in encouraging new members.

More on the Lithuanian Rifleman's Union (usual Wikipedia caveats) here, and the Estonian Defence League here.
 
While I'm  not a sabre-rattler, I think that unfortunately this display of determination is what Russians understand best. Along with these military measures, I would include the maintenance of full diplomatic engagement with Russia, and the establishment of international monitoring of the status of Russian ethnic minorities in the Baltics. We must make sure that Russia is denied any premise to invoke "fraternal rescue" as it did in the Ukraine, by having full visibility of how these minorities are treated (Quite well, I'm certain, but that isn't my point). Russia must not be able to use the "plight" of these groups as a Trojan Horse.
 
milnews.ca said:
Funny you should post this - I just spotted this this week, shared under the Fair Dealing provisions of the Copyright Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-42) ....
And here's part of an Estonian defence think tank's take on the Newsweek article ....
.... First, the basic hard fact is that the Finnish Defense Forces are right now in the process of sending a letter to each reservist between the ages of 20 and 60, a total of around 900,000 individuals. The strength of the Finnish field army today, if fully mobilized, is 230,000 soldiers, but there are about 900,000 Finnish citizens who have received military training through compulsory military conscription. Planning for sending the letters was started some years ago, and as such does not reflect the current tense political and military situation in Europe caused by the Russian annexation of Crimea and the on-going Russian military intervention in Ukraine. According to Finnish Defense Forces press spokesman, Colonel Mika Kalliomaa, planning for sending the letters was initiated as early as in 2010, while the final decision on their contents and timing was made in 2013.

Second, while it is true that this is the first time all reservists are getting this kind of a letter, this is by no means the first time that letters are being sent to reservists. For example, call-up letters are sent routinely to reservists when their designated war-time units are mobilized for peace-time refresher training exercises. For financial reasons, such exercises were relatively small in scale and few in number from 2011 to 2014, but this year they will be expanded, with some 18, 000 reservists to be called up for training and exercises.

Third, the letter in question will not be sent out for operational reasons; rather it is an administrative tool for the Defense Forces to gather and if necessary correct the information they need. The letter will contain such basic information as the name, address, and military rank of the recipient. But it will also tell recipients what their military unit is and, perhaps more importantly, what their tasks would be in a mobilized field army. The first batch of the letters was mailed in the first week of May, and the total of 900,000 letters will be delivered in batches of 80-90, 000 by the end of May.

Fourth, there are over 3 000 different task descriptions in the Finnish field army. Therefore, the letter will be sent in three different versions, depending on the recipient’s crisis situation position or task. One version will be sent to those reservists who are part of the 230,000 strong field army; the second version goes to those who are placed in crisis-time reserves (beyond the field army of 230,000 soldiers); and the third version will be sent to those persons who would not be called up even in crisis situations, as their current civilian jobs are necessary to making sure that the society’s vital tasks will be carried out as effectively and smoothly as possible.

Finally, it is interesting to note that there will be certain groups of people who will not get the letter at all: those who are between 50 and 60 years of age and whose military rank is just a private; those who have for one reason or another (usually for mental or medical problems) been totally freed of conscript military service; those who have refused to do military conscription but who have chosen alternate civil service; those who are living abroad permanently; and those who are currently serving a prison term.

In conclusion, it appears that the Newsweek article bears some of the distinct signs of trolling.

First, it contains either astonishingly shoddy reporting or a purposeful spinning of facts. For example, Finland does not have “a small professional army of 16,000,” as the article claims, but a professional military of roughly half that size, whose main peace-time function is to train conscripts. Furthermore, Finland has since 1994 surely been a steadfast partner to NATO, but it has not “strengthened its ties with the Western Alliance since the crisis in Ukraine erupted.” And there certainly is no “huge pro-NATO campaign underway from the country’s military chiefs,” as every single objective observer of the Finnish media could have told the Newsweek correspondent.

Second, even a rudimentary check of backgrounds would have revealed that Iiskola and Hellevig by no means hold representative opinions in Finland, and are not military or defense policy experts of any sort. To Newsweek’s credit, Capon’s article was quickly updated and Hellevig’s remarks were totally removed after a burst of commotion over the article in the Finnish media. However, the allusion that the Finnish Defense Forces were somehow guilty of instigating panic and playing on the Russian threat was not expunged.

And finally, if Capon had wanted to, she could have pointed to recent Russian intrusions in the northern corner of Europe, near Finnish borders: airspace violations, provocations in territorial waters, aggressive espionage operations, use of energy as a political weapon, even open threats of the use of nuclear weapons. Why she chose not to include these facts in her article is not easy to understand.
 
Back
Top