Eye In The Sky
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 3,094
- Points
- 1,160
I guess being authentic isn’t so good if it equals having to leave healing groups and stuff.
Ok can I get in on this? what was said or done? Remember - infantry. Small words please.While anyone is at it ask about a gang rape survivor being belittled about their mental health during a "healing symposium".
And a Navy Chief Petty Officer1 "overstepping" her boundaries.
Surely you jest.Is the witch hunt now over?
oops...
![]()
In a nut shell, during "Restoring Hearts and Minds Symposium**", a woman named Diane Rose asked a question. The question she asked is not shared.Ok can I get in on this? what was said or done? Remember - infantry. Small words please.
I do enjoy when they begin to eat their own 😄In a nut shell, during "Restoring Hearts and Minds Symposium**", a woman named Diane Rose asked a question. The question she asked is not shared.
Apparently, sometime shortly after, during a short break in the symposium, several other attendees started talking smack about Diane Rose, questioning why she was allowed to ask a question, they began discussing her mental health, and they made statements indicating they believe she is one who creates problems.
The thing is, those making these statements/having these discussions still had their microphones on, including that of the MARLANT Formation CPO1, and many people over heard the conversation, including Diane Rose.
**the event was promoted by INJ20K, an group that advocates for a few sexual misconduct survivors, and was sponsored by the department of defence in concert with McMaster University and organization such as True Patriot Love
I’m not jesting. And stop calling me Shirley 😉Surely you jest.
I do enjoy when they begin to eat their own 😄
Bit awkward when he’s one of one reporters who actually covers the CAF, are we afraid of the fact his articles have been critical of an organization that produces a senior memeber who can’t even understand to turn their mic off when they talk shit about a rape survivor in a public setting ?I'd share the article, but it's by he who shall not be named, and we're not allowed to share hisarticlesdrivel.
That’s not why that reporter is not referred to here. It is a legal liability issue resulting in a restriction within the Site Guidelines.Bit awkward when he’s one of one reporters who actually covers the CAF, are we afraid of the fact his articles have been critical of an organization that produces a senior memeber who can’t even understand to turn their mic off when they talk shit about a rape survivor in a public setting ?
Read the site guidelines and the following thread for an answer to your question:Bit awkward when he’s one of one reporters who actually covers the CAF, are we afraid of the fact his articles have been critical of an organization that produces a senior memeber who can’t even understand to turn their mic off when they talk shit about a rape survivor in a public setting ?
Off topic. That was a great movie.Uh... maybe not
![]()
I've known nothing quite as infuriating as being falsely accused of something you didn't do.Get the popcorn ready for this
![]()
Maj.-Gen. Dany Fortin acquitted on 1988 sexual assault charge
A Quebec civilian judge has acquitted Maj.-Gen. Dany Fortin of sexual assault over an allegation that dates back to 1988. Judge Richard Meredith said he believes the complainant was sexually assaulted, but said the Crown did not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that it was Fortin who had...www.ctvnews.ca
Still not sure how this one got to trial, I don't think it would have happened if he wasn't a high profile person. I don't think there was external political pressure on the prosecutors, but I'm sure the 'optics' factored into their decision to bring this to trial.Did you read the verdict, or just decide to launch your salvo untainted by knowledge? There is nothing from the court that suggests deceit on the part of the accuser; rather, the judge acknowledges that there was nothing properly before the court offering proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
I would say that while some may not doubt the accusers testimony, it seems very strange given the conflicting testimony to believe she was actually in full belief it was in fact MGen Fortin.Did you read the verdict, or just decide to launch your salvo untainted by knowledge? There is nothing from the court that suggests deceit on the part of the accuser; rather, the judge acknowledges that there was nothing properly before the court offering proof beyond a reasonable doubt.