In one case, Soldier B will not be grilled, questioned, brought into their previous experiences with being punched, asked what they were wearing when they got punched, asked if they were maybe getting punched consensually, or if they maybe enjoyed getting punched, etc. during cross examination.
Sexual assault is awful as it is. The process of getting a conviction for a perpetrator can be even worse for a survivor, and even that is not guaranteed. By enforcing the Duty to Report, you take away the option of the survivor to decide of that is an ordeal they want to go through; a lot of them k ow the statistics and going g to trial may not be what helps them heal and move forward after the event and can re traumatized them.
The Sexual Violence First Responder course that Survivor Perspectives ran for us went I to great detail about this and stated priority numero uno in SA situations is supporting the victim; it runs counter to everything we do in the military, where Duty to Report and wanting to right a wrong are core to our "Never Pass a Fault" mentality.
This recommendation I think will do a better job of letting survivors drive the bus in their own recovery, instead of us having to retraumatize someone in the pursuit of "justice"