Que. school worker outed as porn star, suspended

[The Bread Guy]

It is in QR&O Vol 1, Art 19.42 - Civil Employment
(2) No officer or non-commissioned member on full-time service shall authorize the use of the member’s name or photograph in connection with a commercial product, except so far as the member’s name may be part of a firm name.

Would selling pornographic movies/pictures not be in violation of this?

Wearing my Barrack Room Lawyer hat, I'd guess this would apply if Pte. Alphonse Bloggins started "Alphonse Bloggins Stick Flix Productions Inc.", but not if he started "Stick Flix Productions Inc."  I stand to be corrected/better aligned....

We have already had a CF member do the porn thing too. Perhaps you met him in Oka as I know you were there too ...  >

If we're talking about the same person (someone a LOT of Canadians saw that summer), didn't he get into that line of....  entertainment after he left was shown the door by the CF?

 

[Journeyman]

Whereas (also as Barrack Room Lawyer, and not remotely qualified otherwise), I read this as saying that "Alphonse Bloggins Stick Flix Productions Inc" is OK -- his name being part of the title is acceptable.

I believe that the regulation refers to identifying yourself specifically with the military, ie - "Master-Corporal Alphonse Bloggins Stick Flix Productions Inc" is not on, much like said MCpl Bloggins having his photo, in DEU, anywhere in the advertisements be a chargable offence.

Again, just my guess.  :dunno:



Edit: too hasty proof-reading

 

[The Bread Guy]

Whereas (also as Barrack Room Lawyer, and not remotely qualified otherwise), I read this as saying that "Alphonse Bloggins Stick Flix Productions Inc" is OK -- his name being part of the title is acceptable.

I believe that the regulation refers to identifying yourself specifically with the military, ie - "Master-Corporal Alphonse Bloggins Stick Flix Productions Inc" is not on, much like said MCpl Bloggins having having his photo, in DEU, anywhere in the advertisements be a chargable offence.

Again, just my guess.  :dunno:

Makes sense....

 

[Jarnhamar]

having his photo, in DEU, anywhere in the advertisements be a chargable offence.

Kinda like going on much music's speakers corners in DEUs I guess.

 

[Pusser]

If we're talking about the same person (someone a LOT of Canadians saw that summer), didn't he get into that line of....  entertainment after he left was shown the door by the CF?

I think that's right.  As I recall, he was accelerated to MCpl and then eventually got thrown out for getting involved with drugs (pressure of his sudden fame and new responsibility?).  I believe he got into porn as a second career (I wonder how they cover that at SCAN seminars - "Right folks, we're going to break for lunch now.  Please be back for "Starting Your Own Business" at 1300, followed by "Supplementing Your Income Through Pornography" at 1345").

 

[armyvern]

...
If we're talking about the same person (someone a LOT of Canadians saw that summer), didn't he get into that line of....  entertainment after he left was shown the door by the CF?

You are, in fact, correct; Patrick Cloutier - Quebec Sexy Girls II, 1995. He released in '93 after testing positive for cocaine, being demoted to Pte and visiting Club Ed for 45 days.

 

[dapaterson]

You are, in fact, correct; Patrick Cloutier - Quebec Sexy Girls II, 1995.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Cloutier