- Reaction score
I suspect you are right again.Boeing is one of a small handful of US aircraft manufacturers, and an even smaller number of US civilian aircraft manufacturers.
In the US, I'm pretty sure what Boeing wants, sooner or later Boeing gets.
Final A310 MRTT retires from Luftwaffe serviceAfter 22 years of operations, the Luftwaffe (German Air Force, GAF) retired the last of four Airbus A310-304 Multi-Role Tanker Transport (MRTT) aircraft from active service on June 15, leaving Canada as the sole remaining military operator of the widebody strategic tanker/transport.
The final aircraft – serial 10+25 ‘Hermann Köhl’ – was built in 1988 and was operated as part of the Luftwaffe’s Flugbereitschaft des Bundesministeriums der Verteidigung (FBS BMVg, Special Air Mission of the Federal Ministry of Defence) from Köln-Wahn Air Base, near Cologne in western Germany, from 1996 until it was retired on June 15.
Unlike several of the other Luftwaffe-operated A310s, which were flown to Leipzig for scrapping, this aircraft has reportedly been sold to Canada, where it will likely be used as a source of spares for the Royal Canadian Air Force’s (RCAF’s) two-strong fleet of Airbus CC-150T Polaris MRTTs, which entered service in October 2004...
After 22 years of operations, the Luftwaffe retired the last of four Airbus A310-304 Multi-Role Tanker Transport (MRTT) aircraft from active service on June 15, leaving Canada as the sole remaining military operator of the widebody strategic tanker/transportwww.key.aero
I think Spencer 100 meant as in buy an Airbus product (A330 MRTT) so that Airbus doesn’t wholesale move A220 component production and assembly to its Mobile, AL plant.Except that there were only 2 contenders (A330 MRTT and KC-46), and the KC-46 was deemed not qualified.
The A220 wasn't an option.
Yes. Ok for one I would guarantee that AIrbus will use the A220 assembly as IRB. I would. Even if if it was not a direct connection it is surely implied by all parties. I know I would if I was in government.I think Spencer 100 meant as in buy an Airbus product (A330 MRTT) so that Airbus doesn’t wholesale move A220 component production and assembly to its Mobile, AL plant.
Yes sorry ITB. I should have used that. I do think the process does include a scoring for direct and indirect manufacturing in the selection process. They added it for the F35 after the Boeing issue. In the end it didn't really change the outcome. LolSince IRBs (Industrial Regional Benefits) are now ITBs (Industrial Technological Benefits), shouldn't that little loophole be closed?
There were some fairly strict range and payload requirements. I believe Boeing actually pulled their bids. My guess is that it was to put more effort into the Super Hornet and P-8 bids.The Boeing KC-46 was not complaint? It's fueling F-35s now. But I get the teething problems with the boom. They are redesigning the whole thing. But did we pick the A330 MRTT even before the F-35 announcement? Is this still anti Boeing hangover? Which refueling type are we going with? Flying boom? Drogue? The F35A is flying boom. But then I read that one country maybe paying for the F35C system to be put on the F35A.
If the Boeing system is not ready right now and it is requirement of the RFQ. How did Irving, Lockheed, BAE win with the T26? It was not ready at the time either. Makes you think.
As a parts source.Germany's air force has ended three decades of operations with the Airbus A310, with its final example having performed a last flight on 21 June.www.flightglobal.com
aircraft transfered to RCAF