- Reaction score
Gunnar said:I think you're missing the point. The point was not to chop logic on word definitions, the point was to narrow down that you respect the position, appointment or commission as delineated by the Canadian Forces, not the person (as stated, the Officer). I didn't think that was going to be terribly controversial. But hey, maybe I've learned something. I'll have to see how it plays out elsewhere. Perhaps my precision in formulation needs work.
The 'definitions' are the details, details held (in this case) in the Queens Regulations and Orders, which are derived from the NDA. I'd say that is an important factor. You were making statements that were incorrect; full stop.
Honestly; just say to yourself "well, I've improved my GSK" and take the knowledge on. No harm, no foul - you just haven't developed as robust knowledge of some CAF policies, regulations, orders that some mbr's have. None of us know it all or are infallible.