• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Navy to consider gender-neutral ranks

FSTO

Army.ca Veteran
Reaction score
1,033
Points
1,090
Don't know if this is top of mind for females in the RCN?

https://tnc.news/2020/03/06/navy-considering-gender-neutral-alternative-to-junior-seaman-ranks/

Although I'd be okay with Ordinary Rate, Able Rate, Killick and Master Killick.

Or Ordinary (insert trade here), ABN (for Able Bosn)

One wag wants to use Sailor - Ordinary Sailor, Able Sailor, Leading Sailor, Master Sailor. I don't know but to me it sounds kind of dumb.
 

Jarnhamar

Army.ca Legend
Reaction score
3,019
Points
1,060
"Able" is offensive towards the disabled. It's gotta go.

Not comfortable with "master" or "chief" in ranks either.

Are you listening RCN?
 

dapaterson

Army.ca Relic
Subscriber
Donor
Reaction score
5,594
Points
990
I think we just need to use the Reddit progression.

Eager Sailor

Disillusioned Sailor

Bitter Sailor

Petty Officer
 

Infanteer

Moderator
Staff member
Directing Staff
Donor
Reaction score
3,124
Points
1,160
Agreed in that sailor sounds kind of odd.  It'd be like putting "soldier" in an army rank.

I like the term Rate.  It's got a historical appeal.
 

Journeyman

Army.ca Legend
Subscriber
Reaction score
908
Points
940
We have to start with the basics;  the term "huMAN being" is so  offensive!    :waiting:
 

FSTO

Army.ca Veteran
Reaction score
1,033
Points
1,090
My daughter, who is pretty woke BTW :waiting: said when she was in the Naval Reserve, the other women never really gave the term Seaman a second thought. Though there were always snickers about the word "seaman" in the 12 year old boy sense of the word.
 

Oldgateboatdriver

Army.ca Veteran
Reaction score
308
Points
880
Or we go back to pre-1978 structure, with designator for each gender:

Ordinary Seaman, Able Seamen, Leading Seaman and Master Seaman for males; and,

Ordinary Wren, Able Wren, Leading Wren and Master Wren for females.

Oh, wait! Then we would need a whole slew of them for anyone not identifying as part of the binary gender spectrum.  ;D


Well, back to the drawing board. Hey! What about using a non-gendered body part?

We could say: Ordinary Hand, Able Hand, Leading Hand and Master Hand.  :rofl:


Does this mean that we also have to rebrand our ways of working ??? Sailorship instead of seamanship.
 

FSTO

Army.ca Veteran
Reaction score
1,033
Points
1,090
Oldgateboatdriver said:
Or we go back to pre-1978 structure, with designator for each gender:

Ordinary Seaman, Able Seamen, Leading Seaman and Master Seaman for males; and,

Ordinary Wren, Able Wren, Leading Wren and Master Wren for females.

Oh, wait! Then we would need a whole slew of them for anyone not identifying as part of the binary gender spectrum.  ;D


Well, back to the drawing board. Hey! What about using a non-gendered body part?

We could say: Ordinary Hand, Able Hand, Leading Hand and Master Hand.  :rofl:


Does this mean that we also have to rebrand our ways of working ??? Sailorship instead of seamanship.

Funny thing is this initiative is being pushed by men.
 

dimsum

Army.ca Legend
Mentor
Reaction score
3,350
Points
1,260
Oldgateboatdriver said:
Well, back to the drawing board. Hey! What about using a non-gendered body part?

We could say: Ordinary Hand, Able Hand, Leading Hand and Master Hand.  :rofl:

Look at you discriminating against non-handedness  :tsktsk:
 

Eaglelord17

Sr. Member
Reaction score
292
Points
780
Why don't we go back to some historical ranks for our Navy... post unification

Pte, Pte (T), Cpl, MCpl, Sgt, WO, MWO, and CWO...
 

daftandbarmy

Army.ca Relic
Reaction score
9,221
Points
1,160
Eaglelord17 said:
Why don't we go back to some historical ranks for our Navy... post unification

Pte, Pte (T), Cpl, MCpl, Sgt, WO, MWO, and CWO...

Everyone claims to be an 'Operator' these days, so why not?

In other news, it seems that John Paul Jones' Navy has already had a crack at this:


Navy drops job titles in push for gender neutrality

Military | Abandoning the time-honored tradition avoids need for dozens of new descriptions

by Michael Cochrane
Posted 10/06/16, 11:54 am

In a decision the Navy Times called “a tectonic shift in the Navy’s personnel system,” the service last week abandoned the time-honored tradition of referring to enlisted sailors by their rating, or job title, as well as their rank.

Ratings such as Gunner’s Mate, Boatswain’s Mate, and Quartermaster have a lineage going back hundreds of years to the Continental Navy and the British Royal Navy. Even more recently established rates, such as Information Systems Technician Second Class (IT2) or Electronics Technician Third Class (ET3), give many sailors reason to be proud of their naval heritage.

“When you’re a Boatswain’s Mate, it comes with a lot of pride because of what you do,” Schoanna Smith, a sailor stationed aboard the USS Mustin in Yokosuka, Japan, told Stars and Stripes. “Why can’t we be noticed as Boatswain’s Mates? Not everyone does the same job. … I feel it’s like saying all the rates are the same, which they aren’t.”

The move to eliminate the rating system follows Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus’ decision in January to eliminate use of the word “man” in any Navy or Marine Corps job titles. The Marines have removed “man” from 19 occupational titles but were, as yet, unable to find suitable gender-neutral terms for “rifleman” or “mortarman.”

Rather than undertake the tedious task of creating gender-neutral terms for dozens of ratings, including “Yeoman” or “Hospital Corpsman,” the Navy went further than the Marines and scrapped the entire rating system, opting instead for a rank and job classification system similar to those used by the Army and Air Force.

From now on, sailors in the lowest pay grades of E-1 to E-3 will simply be called “seamen,” a term for which Mabus acknowledged he could find no good gender-neutral substitute. Pay grades E-4 to E-6 “will be called ‘Petty Officer Third/Second/First Class’ as appropriate, and senior enlisted pay grades of E-7 through E-9 will be called ‘Chief, Senior Chief, or Master Chief’ depending on their pay grade,” according to a Sept. 29 message to all Navy personnel.

The history of the Navy’s complex enlisted classification system goes back to the Royal Navy of the 18th century, when it was rare for a sailor to change ships, according to the U.S. Naval Institute, “and knowing what job a sailor performed aboard was the most important identifier.”

The power of such an historic tradition showed this week as many sailors voiced frustration with the change.

“Respectfully this is the stupidest decision ever,” wrote one commenter on the Navy Times Facebook page.

The day of the announcement, someone started a petition at whitehouse.gov asking President Barack Obama to overturn the policy.

“One by one, current leadership continues to erode the very things that set the Navy apart from the other services,” the petition states. As of Wednesday, the petition had garnered nearly 61,000 signatures of the 100,000 needed by Oct. 29 to win a response from the White House.


https://world.wng.org/2016/10/navy_drops_job_titles_in_push_for_gender_neutrality
 

Oldgateboatdriver

Army.ca Veteran
Reaction score
308
Points
880
That's right: Let's use something that was in use for ... never, actually. While the "army" ranks were implemented across the CAF at unification, the maritime side of the house never stopped using it's old naval ranks, even if it took about 18 months to formally recognize this fact with the adoption of the "side" rank designation in the NDA annexes.

It took a much longer while, however for this to be actually recognized on pay slips. For quite a while, seamen's pay cheque would be labelled with the "army" equivalent rank, even though they still used their naval ranks as authorized.
 

LittleBlackDevil

Full Member
Reaction score
106
Points
580
daftandbarmy said:
From now on, sailors in the lowest pay grades of E-1 to E-3 will simply be called “seamen,” a term for which Mabus acknowledged he could find no good gender-neutral substitute.

Obviously "seaperson" or "seapeople" is the appropriate gender-neutral substitute.

263b3s.jpg


Glad to see the RCN is right on top of dealing with the most pressing issues facing the navy.
 

Underway

Army.ca Veteran
Donor
Reaction score
2,303
Points
1,010
When it fits I always use inclusive words.  I never use "manning" when "staffing" or "crewing" would work, say good morning "everyone/people" instead of "ladies and gentlemen".  It costs me nothing, is easy, and I get only appreciation back.  It's like using manners.

This also includes terms like "infanteer" instead of "infantryman" etc... 

My vote is we use franglais (no not a joke, it just oddly makes sense to me) the ranks.  Ordinary Matelot, Able Matelot etc...
 

FSTO

Army.ca Veteran
Reaction score
1,033
Points
1,090
Killick has the same French and English meaning.
 

Blackadder1916

Army.ca Veteran
Reaction score
985
Points
1,060
Underway said:
 

My vote is we use franglais (no not a joke, it just oddly makes sense to me) the ranks.  Ordinary Matelot, Able Matelot etc...

Doesn't solve the gender issue.  En francais, "matelot" est un mot "masculin".
 

Cloud Cover

Army.ca Veteran
Subscriber
Reaction score
30
Points
530
LittleBlackDevil said:
Obviously "seaperson" or "seapeople" is the appropriate gender-neutral substitute.

How about just SEAL.

Or, make everyone an admiral and problem solved.
 

Navy_Pete

Army.ca Veteran
Subscriber
Reaction score
1,228
Points
1,040
MCG said:

That or seafarer are common in the civilian side for a catchall; but their crews are small enough that they have names for individual positions (oiler, deckhand, purser, etc).

I think in reality they are mostly using air force radio procedure though; 'Hey Bob, run down the the engine room and check the diesel'
 
Top