• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Canada says it will look at increasing its defence spending and tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever growing sanctions list.

By Tonda MacCharles
Ottawa Bureau
Mon., March 7, 2022

Riga, LATVIA—On the 13th day of the brutal Russian bid to claim Ukraine as its own, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is showing up at the Latvian battle group led by Canadian soldiers, waving the Maple Leaf and a vague hint at more money for the military.

Canada has been waving the NATO flag for nearly seven years in Latvia as a bulwark against Russia’s further incursions in Eastern Europe.

Canada stepped up to lead one of NATO’s four battle groups in 2015 — part of the defensive alliance’s display of strength and solidarity with weaker member states after Russia invaded Ukraine and seized the Crimean peninsula in 2014. Trudeau arrived in the Latvian capital late Monday after meetings in the U.K. with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Netherlands Prime Minister Mark Rutte.

Earlier Monday, faced with a seemingly unstoppable war in Ukraine, Trudeau said he will look at increasing Canada’s defence spending. Given world events, he said there are “certainly reflections to have.”

And Canada tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever-growing sanctions list.

The latest round of sanctions includes names Trudeau said were identified by jailed Russian opposition leader and Putin nemesis Alexei Navalny.

However, on a day when Trudeau cited the new sanctions, and Johnson touted new measures meant to expose Russian property owners in his country, Rutte admitted sanctions are not working.

Yet they all called for more concerted international efforts over the long haul, including more economic measures and more humanitarian aid, with Johnson and Rutte divided over how quickly countries need to get off Russian oil and gas.

The 10 latest names on Canada’s target list do not include Roman Abramovich — a Russian billionaire Navalny has been flagging to Canada since at least 2017. Canada appears to have sanctioned about 20 of the 35 names on Navalny’s list.

The Conservative opposition says the Liberal government is not yet exerting maximum pressure on Putin, and should do more to bolster Canadian Forces, including by finally approving the purchase of fighter jets.

Foreign affairs critic Michael Chong said in an interview that Ottawa must still sanction “additional oligarchs close to President Putin who have significant assets in Canada.”

Abramovich owns more than a quarter of the public shares in steelmaking giant Evraz, which has operations in Alberta and Saskatchewan and has supplied most of the steel for the government-owned Trans Mountain pipeline project.

Evraz’s board of directors also includes two more Russians the U.S. government identified as “oligarchs” in 2019 — Aleksandr Abramov and Aleksandr Frolov — and its Canadian operations have received significant support from the federal government.

That includes at least $27 million in emergency wage subsidies during the pandemic, as well as $7 million through a fund meant to help heavy-polluters reduce emissions that cause climate change, according to the company’s most recent annual report.

In addition to upping defence spending, the Conservatives want NORAD’s early warning system upgraded, naval shipbuilding ramped up and Arctic security bolstered.

In London, Johnson sat down with Trudeau and Rutte at the Northolt airbase. Their morning meetings had a rushed feel, with Johnson starting to usher press out before Trudeau spoke. His office said later that the British PM couldn’t squeeze the full meeting in at 10 Downing Street because Johnson’s “diary” was so busy that day. The three leaders held an afternoon news conference at 10 Downing.

But before that Trudeau met with the Queen, saying she was “insightful” and they had a “useful, for me anyway, conversation about global affairs.”

Trudeau meets with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg Tuesday in Latvia.

The prime minister will also meet with three Baltic leaders, the prime ministers of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, in the Latvian capital of Riga.

The Liberals announced they would increase the 500 Canadian Forces in Latvia by another 460 troops. The Canadians are leading a multinational battle group, one of four that are part of NATO’s deployments in the region.

Another 3,400 Canadians could be deployed to the region in the months to come, on standby for NATO orders.

But Canada’s shipments of lethal aid to Ukraine were slow to come in the view of the Conservatives, and the Ukrainian Canadian community.

And suddenly Western allies are eyeing each other’s defence commitments.

At the Downing Street news conference, Rutte noted the Netherlands will increase its defence budget to close to two per cent of GDP. Germany has led the G7, and doubled its defence budget in the face of Putin’s invasion and threats. Johnson said the U.K. defence spending is about 2.4 per cent and declined to comment on Canada’s defence spending which is 1.4 per cent of GDP.

But Johnson didn’t hold back.

“What we can’t do, post the invasion of Ukraine is assume that we go back to a kind of status quo ante, a kind of new normalization in the way that we did after the … seizure of Crimea and the Donbas area,” Johnson said. “We’ve got to recognize that things have changed and that we need a new focus on security and I think that that is kind of increasingly understood by everybody.”

Trudeau stood by his British and Dutch counterparts and pledged Canada would do more.

He defended his government’s record, saying Ottawa is gradually increasing spending over the next decade by 70 per cent. Then Trudeau admitted more might be necessary.

“We also recognize that context is changing rapidly around the world and we need to make sure that women and men have certainty and our forces have all the equipment necessary to be able to stand strongly as we always have. As members of NATO. We will continue to look at what more we can do.”

The three leaders — Johnson, a conservative and Trudeau and Rutte, progressive liberals — in a joint statement said they “will continue to impose severe costs on Russia.”

Arriving for the news conference from Windsor Castle, Trudeau had to detour to enter Downing Street as loud so-called Freedom Convoy protesters bellowed from outside the gate. They carried signs marked “Tuck Frudeau” and “Free Tamara” (Lich).

Protester Jeff Wyatt who said he has no Canadian ties told the Star he came to stand up for Lich and others who were leading a “peaceful protest” worldwide against government “lies” about COVID-19 and what he called Trudeau’s “tyranny.”

Elsewhere in London, outside the Russian embassy, other protesters and passersby reflected on what they said was real tyranny — the Russian attack on Ukraine. “I think we should be as tough as possible to get this stopped, as tough as possible,” said protester Clive Martinez.
 
Pretty hard to keep a house in your name when you're worm food.

But the article is right, the problem is you cant force people out of their houses because they are old. So we have to wait for the die off.
As one who is in the Boomer Die Off class, Bite Me! Get a job, save , invest for about 40 yrs then we'll talk (maybe)
 
As one who is in the Boomer Die Off class, Bite Me! Get a job, save , invest for about 40 yrs then we'll talk (maybe)

Eat Protein Bar GIF by SnickersUK
 
As one who is in the Boomer Die Off class, Bite Me! Get a job, save , invest for about 40 yrs then we'll talk (maybe)

Yes it's that easy. You are clearly unaware of current salaries and cost of housing in this country. 🤦‍♂️ I'm doing exactly what my parents did in the mid 90's, I have a good job, I'm saving and investing. No way in hell I'll accumulate the amount of wealth they did. Good thing for inheritances, not everyone is that lucky.

Another thread successfully derailed!
 
Yes it's that easy. You are clearly unaware of current salaries and cost of housing in this country. 🤦‍♂️ I'm doing exactly what my parents did in the mid 90's, I have a good job, I'm saving and investing. No way in hell I'll accumulate the amount of wealth they did. Good thing for inheritances, not everyone is that lucky.

Another thread successfully derailed!
take a lesson from the Kazakhstani's. The youngest son stays in the family home to look after the parents and raises his family there. The family works together to raise the necessary money for the older siblings to purchase their own home and move out. They start when the children are young. They work together as a family unit.
 
High price-to-income ratios for housing are not synonymous with making wealth accumulation more difficult. I think it probable that wealth accumulation has become easier. Improved technologies and innovative engineering have made many routine daily activities easier (more productive, less time-consuming), and for the same reasons made many basic goods/services less expensive. A person wishing to compare circumstances to a previous generation should live as they did - same quality of accommodations, same quality of food, same quality and quantity of clothing, same number of cars, same infrequency of dining out and other leisure expenditures, etc, etc. I am confident that one would live much more cheaply that way.

Then the income not spent could be invested, and there are many more investment options with better net returns than were available to previous generations.
 
take a lesson from the Kazakhstani's. The youngest son stays in the family home to look after the parents and raises his family there. The family works together to raise the necessary money for the older siblings to purchase their own home and move out. They start when the children are young. They work together as a family unit.

My grandmother lived with us growing up and I'm sure my mom will eventually move in with us, probably in a larger house. It's pretty much the status-quo for Eastern European cultures.
 
Those are the spitting image of what we're in.
Never lived in a house until we bought one of these on Collegiate St, Wpg in the 70's. Paid $10,500.
Two bedrooms, no basement, oil heater in the floor outside the bathroom. Located near the airport runway, thus house shook. One time, on the roof adjusting the TV antenna, a 747 was landing overhead.
 
crap Pardon my french but schools have been open to all for over a century. My grandmother was the educated one whilst my grandfather had grade 8. Reasons: the Catholic church no longer has the influence it once did, women are working so less time to raise a family, the cost of a home is keeping many working without hope of starting a family, marriage itself is under threat as society has adopted a totally self-centred approach to life so if your significant other (hate that term) doesn't suit, find another. That approach to family doesn't leave space for kids. Rant off.
By education, I'm talking about post-secondary education for women in the 'western society' and completed high school for the rest of the world


In a nutshell, data show that the higher the level of a woman’s educational attainment, the fewer children she is likely to bear.
In Ghana, women with a high school education have a TFR (Total Fertility Rate) between 2 and 3, whereas those with no education have a TFR of about 6, even as recently as 2008. Similarly, women with a high school education in Ethiopia have a TFR of 1.3.

In considering whether female education actually drives a decline in the TFR, one might ask whether the opposite is true – do women who prefer smaller families want to study longer? However, the evidence from sub-Saharan Africa clearly supports the causal role of female education in fertility decline. For example, an education reform in Kenya that increased the length of primary education by a year resulted in increased female educational attainment, and delayed marriage and fertility. One randomized control trial found that reducing the cost of school uniforms in Kenya not only reduced dropout rates, but also reduced teenage marriage and childbearing. Another study found that increasing female education by one year in Nigeria reduced early fertility by 0.26 births.

A forthcoming study (Pradhan and Canning 2013) of education and fertility in Ethiopia estimated that an additional year of schooling in Ethiopia would lead to a 7 percentage point reduction in the probability of teenage birth and a 6 percentage point decrease in the probability of marriage. These are large effects, suggesting that women with eight years of schooling would have a fertility rate 53 percentage points lower than those with no schooling at all, and are consistent with observed data.

Why does female education have a direct effect on fertility? The economic theory of fertility suggests an incentive effect: more educated women have higher opportunity costs of bearing children in terms of lost income. The household bargaining model suggests that more educated women are better able to support themselves and have more bargaining power, including on family size.

According to the ideation theory, more educated women may learn different ideas of desired family size through school, community, and exposure to global communication networks. Finally, more educated women know more about prenatal care and child health, and hence might have lower fertility because of greater confidence that their children will survive.
 
The only reason I was able to buy a house was because I went on repeated, back to back tours over a very short period of time. If you think a little bit of elbow grease and cutting back some luxuries (such as occasional eating out as a family) will grant enough money to buy a house in the 2020s, I have a bridge to sell you.
 
The only reason I was able to buy a house was because I went on repeated, back to back tours over a very short period of time. If you think a little bit of elbow grease and cutting back some luxuries (such as occasional eating out as a family) will grant enough money to buy a house in the 2020s, I have a bridge to sell you.
There is definitely merit in what you say but there are many variables to this. Location is a big part of it, as well as type of employment for both yourself and your spouse, along with the standard of living that you live.

My wife and I both drive Honda's (yes, I'm originally from Windsor and yes I don't drive cars from the 'Big Three', but my cars are manufactured here in Canada), me a 2008 Honda Civic and her a 2016 CRV. Our cars are 15 and 7yrs old respectively. I have zero expectations of selling my Civic in the next 2, maybe 3 or 4yrs and that CRV will mostly likely be around for another 5+yrs. Could I afford to go out right now and buy a 3 series BMW, yes, luckily I could do so, same with my wife. But I had an accountant for a father, who worked 42yrs with Chrysler Canada in the financial department and he drilled into my head and my brothers head - "a car is a depreciating asset, treat it as such' - meaning buy a good car and run it into the ground before you buy another. My brother drives a 2000(!) Dodge Dakota pick-up truck still, it has over 550,000km on it. He doesn't intend to sell it until it breaks 600,000km and I wouldn't be surprised if he changes his mind at 600,000 and looks for 650,000km. He is luckily in the same position as myself, he could have bought a new truck years ago, decades ago, but the current truck still does want he needs it to do - get him reliably from Point A to Point B in some comfort and safety.

Prices of houses have gone up but people's expectations as to what is 'normal' have gone up even higher in my opinion. Hell, I peel off stamps on envelopes that haven't been cancelled by Canada Post just so I can re-use them and not buy new ones, that's how frugal I can be. When out of walks I pick up and take home beer bottles or liquor bottles so I can return them for the deposit.
 
take a lesson from the Kazakhstani's. The youngest son stays in the family home to look after the parents and raises his family there. The family works together to raise the necessary money for the older siblings to purchase their own home and move out. They start when the children are young. They work together as a family unit.

1st son inherits
2nd son to the ministry
3rd son to the army
4th and subsequent on remittances to Alberta to raise cattel.

It worked. :D
 
Given that major defence procurements often take decades to implement in Canada, this open letter should have been titled a “Mea Culpa.”

The signatories were all in senior positions of power when the Canadian military went woefully off course.

Only now that they are safely aboard their retirement lifeboats are they raising the alarm that Canada’s military is about to sink.

 
The only reason I was able to buy a house was because I went on repeated, back to back tours over a very short period of time. If you think a little bit of elbow grease and cutting back some luxuries (such as occasional eating out as a family) will grant enough money to buy a house in the 2020s, I have a bridge to sell you.
Maybe not in some of the overinflated markets. But certainly in other markets.
 

posted here as Im not sure where all the comorant stuff belongs. Looks like the on again off again is back on again. 16 helicopters upgraded
 
Back
Top