• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Canada says it will look at increasing its defence spending and tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever growing sanctions list.

By Tonda MacCharles
Ottawa Bureau
Mon., March 7, 2022

Riga, LATVIA—On the 13th day of the brutal Russian bid to claim Ukraine as its own, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is showing up at the Latvian battle group led by Canadian soldiers, waving the Maple Leaf and a vague hint at more money for the military.

Canada has been waving the NATO flag for nearly seven years in Latvia as a bulwark against Russia’s further incursions in Eastern Europe.

Canada stepped up to lead one of NATO’s four battle groups in 2015 — part of the defensive alliance’s display of strength and solidarity with weaker member states after Russia invaded Ukraine and seized the Crimean peninsula in 2014. Trudeau arrived in the Latvian capital late Monday after meetings in the U.K. with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Netherlands Prime Minister Mark Rutte.

Earlier Monday, faced with a seemingly unstoppable war in Ukraine, Trudeau said he will look at increasing Canada’s defence spending. Given world events, he said there are “certainly reflections to have.”

And Canada tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever-growing sanctions list.

The latest round of sanctions includes names Trudeau said were identified by jailed Russian opposition leader and Putin nemesis Alexei Navalny.

However, on a day when Trudeau cited the new sanctions, and Johnson touted new measures meant to expose Russian property owners in his country, Rutte admitted sanctions are not working.

Yet they all called for more concerted international efforts over the long haul, including more economic measures and more humanitarian aid, with Johnson and Rutte divided over how quickly countries need to get off Russian oil and gas.

The 10 latest names on Canada’s target list do not include Roman Abramovich — a Russian billionaire Navalny has been flagging to Canada since at least 2017. Canada appears to have sanctioned about 20 of the 35 names on Navalny’s list.

The Conservative opposition says the Liberal government is not yet exerting maximum pressure on Putin, and should do more to bolster Canadian Forces, including by finally approving the purchase of fighter jets.

Foreign affairs critic Michael Chong said in an interview that Ottawa must still sanction “additional oligarchs close to President Putin who have significant assets in Canada.”

Abramovich owns more than a quarter of the public shares in steelmaking giant Evraz, which has operations in Alberta and Saskatchewan and has supplied most of the steel for the government-owned Trans Mountain pipeline project.

Evraz’s board of directors also includes two more Russians the U.S. government identified as “oligarchs” in 2019 — Aleksandr Abramov and Aleksandr Frolov — and its Canadian operations have received significant support from the federal government.

That includes at least $27 million in emergency wage subsidies during the pandemic, as well as $7 million through a fund meant to help heavy-polluters reduce emissions that cause climate change, according to the company’s most recent annual report.

In addition to upping defence spending, the Conservatives want NORAD’s early warning system upgraded, naval shipbuilding ramped up and Arctic security bolstered.

In London, Johnson sat down with Trudeau and Rutte at the Northolt airbase. Their morning meetings had a rushed feel, with Johnson starting to usher press out before Trudeau spoke. His office said later that the British PM couldn’t squeeze the full meeting in at 10 Downing Street because Johnson’s “diary” was so busy that day. The three leaders held an afternoon news conference at 10 Downing.

But before that Trudeau met with the Queen, saying she was “insightful” and they had a “useful, for me anyway, conversation about global affairs.”

Trudeau meets with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg Tuesday in Latvia.

The prime minister will also meet with three Baltic leaders, the prime ministers of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, in the Latvian capital of Riga.

The Liberals announced they would increase the 500 Canadian Forces in Latvia by another 460 troops. The Canadians are leading a multinational battle group, one of four that are part of NATO’s deployments in the region.

Another 3,400 Canadians could be deployed to the region in the months to come, on standby for NATO orders.

But Canada’s shipments of lethal aid to Ukraine were slow to come in the view of the Conservatives, and the Ukrainian Canadian community.

And suddenly Western allies are eyeing each other’s defence commitments.

At the Downing Street news conference, Rutte noted the Netherlands will increase its defence budget to close to two per cent of GDP. Germany has led the G7, and doubled its defence budget in the face of Putin’s invasion and threats. Johnson said the U.K. defence spending is about 2.4 per cent and declined to comment on Canada’s defence spending which is 1.4 per cent of GDP.

But Johnson didn’t hold back.

“What we can’t do, post the invasion of Ukraine is assume that we go back to a kind of status quo ante, a kind of new normalization in the way that we did after the … seizure of Crimea and the Donbas area,” Johnson said. “We’ve got to recognize that things have changed and that we need a new focus on security and I think that that is kind of increasingly understood by everybody.”

Trudeau stood by his British and Dutch counterparts and pledged Canada would do more.

He defended his government’s record, saying Ottawa is gradually increasing spending over the next decade by 70 per cent. Then Trudeau admitted more might be necessary.

“We also recognize that context is changing rapidly around the world and we need to make sure that women and men have certainty and our forces have all the equipment necessary to be able to stand strongly as we always have. As members of NATO. We will continue to look at what more we can do.”

The three leaders — Johnson, a conservative and Trudeau and Rutte, progressive liberals — in a joint statement said they “will continue to impose severe costs on Russia.”

Arriving for the news conference from Windsor Castle, Trudeau had to detour to enter Downing Street as loud so-called Freedom Convoy protesters bellowed from outside the gate. They carried signs marked “Tuck Frudeau” and “Free Tamara” (Lich).

Protester Jeff Wyatt who said he has no Canadian ties told the Star he came to stand up for Lich and others who were leading a “peaceful protest” worldwide against government “lies” about COVID-19 and what he called Trudeau’s “tyranny.”

Elsewhere in London, outside the Russian embassy, other protesters and passersby reflected on what they said was real tyranny — the Russian attack on Ukraine. “I think we should be as tough as possible to get this stopped, as tough as possible,” said protester Clive Martinez.
 
Tom Mulcair was perhaps one of the best leaders the NDP had .I'm still trying figure out why they got rid of him . And replacing hin with a near non entity .
Because he dared to say he would balance the budget. That was heresy in NDP lifer circles. And he committed the other heresy of being a Liberal prior to being a Dipper. So pragmatist + newcomer = extremely short leash.

Amongst the Dipper lifer circles, th leader can be a complete failure as long as you’re ideologically pure. It doesn’t matter if the leader has made the Party irrelevant and the government is eating their lunch.
 
Good news is that the CDS and CAFCWO combined won't spend that much on their hair for the rest of their lives.
Nor should anyone that follows. Our regs have evolved as such that grooming costs are no longer an issue 😉
 
Because he dared to say he would balance the budget. That was heresy in NDP lifer circles. And he committed the other heresy of being a Liberal prior to being a Dipper. So pragmatist + newcomer = extremely short leash.

Amongst the Dipper lifer circles, th leader can be a complete failure as long as you’re ideologically pure. It doesn’t matter if the leader has made the Party irrelevant and the government is eating their lunch.
Classic Left.

Never communist enough for a real Communist.
 
I have actually had people express that in conversation with me.
The time to worry about the NDP is when they elect someone who stands before us in a pair of jeans and a sweatshirt or a t-shift and wears a simple Timex watch. Someone who donates a sizeable portion of his/her MP's salary to the local food bank or soup kitchen. Someone who surrounds themselves with aides/advisors who dress the same as he/she does and does the same thing with their salaries. That is when you will know that they are serious about their socialist mantra and are looking gather their base and make their version of change happen.
 
serious question: this thread started almost a year ago and is now on page 158. With all those comments is there even one that tangibly demonstrates living up to the theme of boosting defense spending?
 
The RCAF is getting ball hats at some point?

Randy Savage Yes GIF by WWE
 
It was a hint, not a commitment.

The parties controlling Parliament happily blew out the budget even before crisis struck, took measures that blew it out further to deal with crisis, and added substantial new program spending. All of that was popular (enough) with voters. The stories I see on CBC are mostly about "health care in crisis", not "defence in crisis". Even here, who is willing to give up their new childcare subsidy or dental care subsidy (if eligible), or accept a return to, say, year 2000 income tax rates?

Defence is going to be "managed readiness" at the macro level for the long-term foreseeable future. "Full capability" (whatever that might be, but assuming it means at least one each minor naval, land, and air formation ready to go with necessary contemporary capabilities) isn't on the table.
 
It was a hint, not a commitment.

The parties controlling Parliament happily blew out the budget even before crisis struck, took measures that blew it out further to deal with crisis, and added substantial new program spending. All of that was popular (enough) with voters. The stories I see on CBC are mostly about "health care in crisis", not "defence in crisis". Even here, who is willing to give up their new childcare subsidy or dental care subsidy (if eligible), or accept a return to, say, year 2000 income tax rates?

Defence is going to be "managed readiness" at the macro level for the long-term foreseeable future. "Full capability" (whatever that might be, but assuming it means at least one each minor naval, land, and air formation ready to go with necessary contemporary capabilities) isn't on the table.
Not so sure about the above.

If you add multiple weeks of what has just occurred regarding these unknown source of balloons popping up over various places in NA, specifically moving them down from Alaska/Yukon to more mundane places like Montreal, Calgary, Ottawa, North Bay, Sherbrooke, Kansas City, Sacramento, Boise, Tallahassee, Atlanta, New Orleans, Houston, etc and you'll start to see yammering about the need for more funding of the CAF. If it continues to be ONLY US fighters shooting down balloons across Canadian airspace then the pressure will be on for the Petit Dauphin to do something.
 
Back
Top