• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Combat Medic Saves Lives Using New Evacuation System

GAP

Army.ca Legend
Subscriber
Donor
Mentor
Reaction score
24
Points
380
Why We Serve: Combat Medic Saves Lives Using New Evacuation System
By Gerry J. Gilmore American Forces Press Service WASHINGTON, Oct. 12, 2007
Article Link

A veteran Air Force combat medic helped to transform the way wounded troops are treated and evacuated during a recent deployment to Afghanistan.

Tech Sgt. Mark A. DeCorte recalled the previous practice when unarmed battlefield medics were flown in to treat and evacuate injured servicemembers usually after an area had been cleared of the enemy.

However, DeCorte emphasized, “When you have a wounded soldier on the ground, they need help now.”

DeCorte is among a group of 10 servicemembers who served in Iraq, Afghanistan or the Horn of Africa who have been selected to tell the military’s story to the American people at community, business, veteran’s and other gatherings as part of the Defense Department’s “Why We Serve” public outreach program.

Why We Serve began last fall and was originally the idea of former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Marine Gen. Peter Pace. Representatives from all the service branches participate in the program, which is conducted in quarterly segments. DeCorte and the other nine servicemembers in his group constitute the fifth iteration since the program began.

“I think the program is awesome,” DeCorte said, noting that Americans need to hear the success stories and sacrifices of U.S. servicemembers deployed overseas in the war against terrorism.

The concept of treating and evacuating injured servicemembers during the din of battle was tested during DeCorte’s tour of duty in Afghanistan from February to June 2006, the 13-year military veteran said.

The Army had requested Air Force assistance to improve its air-ambulance capabilities in Afghanistan’s austere, mountainous terrain, DeCorte explained.

Previous doctrine was to send in medical-evacuation helicopters after the fighting had stopped, he noted, but this practice meant that some troops wouldn’t survive the trip to the hospital. That procedure would change.

In Afghanistan, DeCorte was one of several military medics embedded with aerial combat-support units. Instead of using traditional rotary- or fixed-wing aircraft marked with red crosses, the new wave combat medics carried arms as they flew directly into the maelstrom aboard armored helicopter gunships.

The idea, DeCorte explained, was to treat the wounded as quickly as possible. And, when the concept was tested on the battlefield, it contributed to achieving a previously unimagined wounded-survivability rate of 90 percent, he said.

“We can now go in embedded (with combat units) and part of the operation,” DeCorte said.

And instead of the famous but fragile UH-1 “Huey” helicopters that were used to evacuate wounded U.S. troops during the Vietnam War, DeCorte and his fellow medics today fly into action aboard HH-60-G Pave Hawk helicopters, the same aircraft favored by U.S. Special Operations troops.
More on link
 
OK, this may be a dumb remark (yes, I make them sometimes) but it sounds like these units didn't have medics as part of their orbat. I thought that every rifle company had at least two medics with them at all times?
 
No, front line units still have their medics, the difference from before is that now mini-gun armed HH-60s will come in with armed medics to evac the wounded from the CCP to the field hosp. Think of our brigade Fd Ambs using Blackhawks instead of Bisons.

Before last yr the medics on the helos would not be armed and the medevac helos would not go into a "hot" LZ.
 
Back
Top