• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Canada eyeing reservists to bolster force in Afghanistan

Sort yourselves out, the whole lot of ya's (No I am not talking as a mod, so step back from that one).


None of you have conveyed an opinion regarding PTSD, and how it is contracted, with any knowledge of the disorder.  Get your information correct, before spouting of about weakness.

And some of you hold a leadership postion??

Nice.

dileas

tess
 
Gate_Guard,

I believe the window for PCF courses for 1-08 has passed, but things may have changed in the week since I heard the plan.

I know there's some Bison CC courses being run over the next couple of weeks, but even that is kind of pushing it, with the TMST that has to get done. I doubt, and someone may come along and correct me, that there's time for a LAV Turret course or gunnery tng on the beasts.

As for issues with staffing and resources, yes, there are some  ;D

DF

Edited to add:

Kiwi, WTF are you talking about? PTSD is not something you see coming down the pipe (or rarely).  It's not something you can avoid;  if ANYONE gets pushed far enough, they'll suffer for it down the road.  It's an operational injury, just like taking a round, or losing a leg.  The CF is as liable for one as the other, and therefore has an obligation to you.  They also, then, have an obligation to mitigate that risk within the constraints of the mission.

I'm not saying someone who extends time in theater is automatically going to develop PTSD, but the odds increase with the longer you're exposed to the stressor.  You are right; this is a digression from the topic, and may best be brought up in the CFHS forums, specifically the Mental Health one.

There's a number of SMEs on the subject on here, including some MH specialists, who I hope step in.



 
Back to the issue at hand, I was shocked when I found out how many troops from my unit applied for each and every stream availible. I think to be honest, about 1/2 of our regulars have put thier names in, had interviews with the OC of our unit and are being put forward. I think this is fantastic as it will show the CF higher-ups and also the civilians that we, part-time "weekend warriors" are chomping at the bit to step up to the plate. I don't think LFCA wil have trouble getting 500+ pers to fill the required TF...

All the guys I originally joined up with who are still training/parading have signed up for various 'Streams' and I'm rather jealous, because I put in for a Component Transfer in Dec and was told if I put in for a tour, it'll basically put my Reg Force application on hold! I'd be willing to do a 2year contract for sure...

We'll see how it all pans out, I think this is a good thing to say the least. That's what we're bloody here for! To help support and augument the Regular Force army AS and WHEN needed!

 
I have to realize, that after reading what Kiwi99 said, going over his post and sleeping on it, that I see the raw core of what he is saying.  This is not a new army, but the old one reborn, and the soldiers of today have got to get back that technique of finding that inner beast  and unleashing him when fighting, but be strong enough to lock him back into his cage.

If the Troops are here for the long run, they can expect to see multiple tours, and if they breakdown in the first smell of Cordite then they have not only failed the system, and their buddies, they have failed themselves.

As for the reservist, who get thrown back into a completely alien and total civvy life afterwards, I hope there is support there not only to teach him how to Unleash, but to properly suppress this beast afterwards.

dileas

tess

 
Blindspot said:
No longer. Recruitment has been taken over by 32 Brigade. Since then the units that I mentioned have not been "hiring". Strange is it not? Particularily when the Queen's Own have a new Armoury to fill.

Umm we still have our own recruiter. ???
 
Kiwi99 said:
But what concerns me, and I think this needs to be cleared up, is the fact that apparently by 2009, all reg force soldiers will have been to afghanistan. 
My pet peeve again, you mean INFANTEERS not SOLDIERS. There are tens of thousands of reg force soldiers who will never see the desert(while others go multiple times I might add).
 
Blindspot said:
Well, from CFRC Toronto: "The Queen's Own Rifles of Canada are not hiring." Neither are the 48th Highlanders apparently. Officers I have talked to say WTF?

This could mean a few things... One, don't always trust CFRC on questions regarding Reserve recruiting - go to the unit itself, thats why each Regiment pays its own recruiter. Second, until April 1, CF Recruiting Group has put a hold on the processing of Reserve applications: The Res F is close to meeting its targets for the fiscal year, the Reg F is not, so priority is being given to Reg F applicants until the end of the year to get their numbers up. However, you can still apply, and your file will still go to CFRC, it will just sit at the bottom of the Bookings pile until the new fiscal year. 

Infidel-6 said:
Biggest problem I see from this issue (and look back its nothing new - look to the early 90's for augmentee issues) if that for reservists be employable beyond the Cpl/Pte level they need LAV experience.  Unless the reservists is willing to make a 2+year comitment to the tour -- they are not going to get LAV experience and courses.

Absolutely. And not just LAV experience - there's a whole range of courses and experience that is simply not available to Reserve NCOs. There's a relatively small gap between a Reg Private and a Res Private, and that can be made up with enthusiasm, intelligence and fitness. But there's a much wider gap between a Res Sgt and a Reg Sgt, and there's no way to catch up. I question the entire idea of Reserve Companies, given the lack of experience in such a Companies leadership.

Matt_Fisher said:
I'm with Kiwi on this one, in that I don't think that we should assume that simply by being in theatre someone is going to go insane or experience levels of PTSD that will incapacitate them.  Lets look at history, in the First and Second World Wars, we had troops that remained in combat/in theatre for years at a time. 

I won't touch on PTSD, but I don't think the average Allied soldier in WW1 or WW2 had equivalent 'combat time' as many soldiers serving in Iraq or Afghanistan. Troops in WW1 were rotated often, and spent most of their time in safety and comfort behind the lines. Troops in WW2 had long stretches of combat, but then were rotated back to wait for the next battle/invasion. Troops in Iraq (as you know very well) are out there almost every day for a year, and Canadians in A'stan are out in the field for a huge percentage of their time, and in both places there is no safe rear area.

R031 Pte Joe said:
Back to the issue at hand, I was shocked when I found out how many troops from my unit applied for each and every stream availible. I think to be honest, about 1/2 of our regulars have put thier names in, had interviews with the OC of our unit and are being put forward. I think this is fantastic as it will show the CF higher-ups and also the civilians that we, part-time "weekend warriors" are chomping at the bit to step up to the plate. I don't think LFCA wil have trouble getting 500+ pers to fill the required TF...

We'll see how it all pans out, I think this is a good thing to say the least. That's what we're bloody here for! To help support and augument the Regular Force army AS and WHEN needed!

Good attitude R031!
However - what happens when the Army comes back next year looking for more volunteers? LFCA will have sent 500 hard-chargers overseas, and they won't be available. Who's left? Sure, there will be a handful who weren't able to go before, but I doubt any Area can produce 500 good volunteers twice. Plus, think of what your unit will look like over the coming year when all of those people are gone - it will be harder to get instructors to teach, harder to get range staff or experienced troops/NCOs to run Ex's, and a whole crop of recruits will come in to a very different Regiment. My old unit is in the midst of this right now - almost the entire platoon and company level chain of command, plus almost all the cpl's, are overseas and there is a marked difference in the quality of training. The unit is essentially on life-support until those troops get back, and thats not unusual for any of the units in my Brigade.

This is not to say that those 500 shouldn't go - on the contrary, going to Afghanistan is the best and most important thing they could be doing - but there is a price to sending so many (as the Regs know) and its doubtful it can happen twice. This is why I hope the CLS doens't really see the Reserves as an untapped pool; the Reserves are good for low-level augmentation, and short bursts of heavy augmentation, but the Reserves can't maintain the numbers the CLS has talked about.
 
hank011 said:
My pet peeve again, you mean INFANTEERS not SOLDIERS. There are tens of thousands of reg force soldiers who will never see the desert(while others go multiple times I might add).

There are hundreds of Reg F infanteers who will never see the desert either.  They're stuck at the schools, in staff jobs, on categories or DAGging Red for a variety of reasons.

In every occupation, what you have to look at is the soldier at desk "A" with five tours sitting across from his peer at desk "B" with no tours.  Then ask yourself "why is it that this soldier "B" DAGs red for every tour?".  Yes, there's lots of 'em, who are either protected by the C of C because they fill an essential (in someone's mind) "function" or who have a litany of personal/medical/family problems which never manifest themselves on cool courses or jammy taskings but are conveniently whipped out during the DAG.  Then they get all righteous and pissed off when "a Toon steals their tour".

As a full bull at NDHQ said recently to a room full of taskers (me included)  "Tell you're people that if you're not deployable, then you're not employable".

Enfield said:
But there's a much wider gap between a Res Sgt and a Reg Sgt, and there's no way to catch up.

So why bother trying, right?  Why bother allowing Reserve NCOs to lead on operations in progressively more complex environments?  Leave them at home to train BMQ, SQ and DP1 while the soldiers they train go off and gain relevant operational experience.  Great idea.

I question the entire idea of Reserve Companies, given the lack of experience in such a Companies leadership.

And you base this comment on what??

However - what happens when the Army comes back next year looking for more volunteers? LFCA will have sent 500 hard-chargers overseas, and they won't be available. Who's left? Sure, there will be a handful who weren't able to go before, but I doubt any Area can produce 500 good volunteers twice.

That's why each area only has to cough up volunteers every third Roto.  There's four areas, remember?  There's rarely a shortage of Reserve volunteers, many of whom are on second or third Afghanistan tours.

Plus, think of what your unit will look like over the coming year when all of those people are gone - it will be harder to get instructors to teach, harder to get range staff or experienced troops/NCOs to run Ex's, and a whole crop of recruits will come in to a very different Regiment.

True.  They'll come into a Regiment populated by leaders and soldiers with real-world, recent operational experience except that, oh yeah, you don't think Reserve NCOs should go.

My old unit is in the midst of this right now - almost the entire platoon and company level chain of command, plus almost all the cpl's, are overseas and there is a marked difference in the quality of training. The unit is essentially on life-support until those troops get back, and thats not unusual for any of the units in my Brigade.

Remember that the COs allowed this to happen. Likely they're looking at "short term pain for long term gain".  Contrary to your belief, they obviously saw the benefits in letting their NCOs deploy.

This is not to say that those 500 shouldn't go - on the contrary, going to Afghanistan is the best and most important thing they could be doing - but there is a price to sending so many (as the Regs know) and its doubtful it can happen twice.

I've said it before and I'll say it again.  The price to the Army is in Reserve admininstration.  Fix that at the front end and you'll DAG more Reservists GREEN faster and with far less expense in time and money.

 
In many cases reservists being sent to Afghanistan will have previous tours.  At one point 5 reservists in my section had previous tours.  Our reserve platoon signaller (with a simple reserve ql4 comms course) quite often had to sort out the comms and raidos for the reg guys in lavs.  I'm not sure if they just don't get comms courses or what the issue was.


A huge problem I see is courses.  We need more courses.  We spend two weeks doing a gun course for the RWS in Canada and once we get overseas and realise we're still short we run day and a half conversion course.  We need to streamline this stuff back in Canada and get more guys qualified on everything.

WRT reserve infantry, I think we should push to get our reservists LAV driver courses, LAV gunner courses and crew commander courses.  force feed them comms courses, driver wheeled courses and TCCC.

Yes regs don't like the idea of reservists doing their jobs, it takes away positions from reg force guys and time is always a factor.
Well whats our options? Send guys overseas and have them need the courses anyways?
We need to figure out how to get more guys, res and reg, qualified on this stuff period.  I have no idea how but we need to find a way.

I'm not sure about reserve companies. Their going to have ex reg forces guys, guys with multiple tours etc..  Not sure about the leadership thats out of my lane. What did reserves do for leadership in WW2?

Troops in WW1 were rotated often, and spent most of their time in safety and comfort behind the lines.

Except for sleeping in trenches beside the bodies of your buddies or using human bones to hang clothing and equipment off of and stuff or being shelled for a week straight. :)
 
One of the complaints I hear from the Reserves is that the present courses are to long and it’s difficult to get the time off from there day job.

How about a traveling team with a LAV or 2 going from reserve unit to unit giving the guys a chance to familiarize themselves with them? 
 
Enfield - suck back and reload here - go back and read your basic history texts on WWI and WWII combat. Rotation in/out of the lines was particular to each nation's approach, and could differ greatly. Some nations ground their Divisions to a pulp before replacing them. Having units in high intensity combat day in, day out, for over a month, was entirely within the realm of possibility.

Flawed Design - In the HSS world I've never found Reg F saying that Res F are taking their jobs away from them. From the perspective of our clinicians - most, if not all, are damned glad that a Res F member is stepping up so that they don't have to go through their umpteenth tour...... Our problem is that the Res F Med Tech, unless they are at minimum a civy Primary Care Paramedic, are not considered deployable in a Med Tech role.
 
Haggis said:
So why bother trying, right?  Why bother allowing Reserve NCOs to lead on operations in progressively more complex environments?  Leave them at home to train BMQ, SQ and DP1 while the soldiers they train go off and gain relevant operational experience.  Great idea.

And you base this comment on what??

you don't think Reserve NCOs should go.

Yes Enfield, I too, would like to hear your "all knowing" response as to why I and a lot of others here shouldn't bother..
How about a traveling team with a LAV or 2 going from reserve unit to unit giving the guys a chance to familiarize themselves with them?

Unfortunately, Colin that just doesn't work for a variety of politics, policies, equipment issues.  Besides for Res units  a "Show'n Tell" response to training sells them short all over again.  Take look at the LAV threads in the Armour area..  You'll gain more perspective to what we are talking about and it's much more complicated than courses being too long and getting time off..
 
Haggis said:
I've said it before and I'll say it again.  The price to the Army is in Reserve admininstration.  Fix that at the front end and you'll DAG more Reservists GREEN faster and with far less expense in time and money.

The problem is that many units just don't do their admin.  Look at NES as an indicator: There are units with a single NES member of a year or more; there are others with dozens.  Untis are resourced the same - why do some keep records up to date and others not?

It's a chain of command issue - commanders at all levels have to push for this.  The resources are there, but too many commanders re-allocate them to "higher priorities".  It's time to remind folks of what the priorities should be.
 
Haggis said:
So why bother trying, right?  Why bother allowing Reserve NCOs to lead on operations in progressively more complex environments?  Leave them at home to train BMQ, SQ and DP1 while the soldiers they train go off and gain relevant operational experience.  Great idea.

There are two different issues here, and I’ll try to clarify them:
1) Reservists are not as well trained and experienced as the Regular Force, simply because of part vs full time. At the Pte/Cpl level this can be rectified relatively quickly and easily, and Reserve NCM's brought up to speed. At the NCO/Officer level this becomes more difficult; there is a greater difference in experience and formal courses between the Regs and Reservists. I don’t see how this difference can be closed – the courses take years to get, and the experience even longer.

2) Reserve Companies are one way to employ reservists on operation, augmentation is another option, and Reserve-centric specialties like CIMIC and PsyOps a third, and there are others. Given my own experience with Reserve Companies, and the things I hear from others, I don’t believe that Reserve Companies offer the best way to integrate Reservists into operations, and one of the reasons I don’t believe they are optimal is because of the wide gulf between the Reg F NCO/Officer standard and the Res F NCO/Officer standard.

Many Reserve NCOs do perform brilliantly, and match or exceed their Reg counterparts, but more than a few fail in their new leadership positions (as many Reserve troops fail in their new roles). One night a week, one weekend a month does not give someone a whole lot of leadership experience. The Army has decreed that infantry reservists require One Year of pre-training to be allowed to a) operate as pte/cpl in a Reg F infantry section, or b) guard a gate and escort convoys under Reservist leadership, so as far as I can tell, the Army agrees with me.

I would prefer a more competitive system that was not obligated to employ "x" number of Reservists, in whatever ranks, in each position, to fill a Reserve Company establishment but rather an open system of augmentation based on need. Let ability and skill decide, not the need to maintain the integrity of the Reserve company. I also like the idea of specialties, such as CIMIC and PsyOps, being maintained primarily in the Reserves - make us experts in some areas, rather than half-trained infanteers/gunners/whatever.

Haggis said:
And you base this comment on what??
Serving in the Reserve Company on Roto 11 with 1 PPCLI in Bosnia.
Having many friends serving as augmentees in 2RCR and in the Reserve Company with TF1-07.
A very long and informative conversation with a group of British TA Combat Engineers who had served as a formed Reserve Troop in Iraq. (They regarded their own leadership as a complete failure in Iraq, and would have much preferred to be broken up and placed under their regular counterparts.)
Conversations with RegF troops who work with reservists in TMST and overseas.

Haggis said:
That's why each area only has to cough up volunteers every third Roto.  There's four areas, remember?  There's rarely a shortage of Reserve volunteers, many of whom are on second or third Afghanistan tours.

Every third Roto means every 1.5 years, and nominations would likely start even earlier. It takes 8 months to over a year to train a reservist infanteer, plus the one year of pre-training. This means we’re using up the limited pool of troops we have now, because we won’t be getting bodies in the ranks fast enough. Yes, everyone is keen to go over – but most will only go once, and there is a finite number who are able (for a variety of reasons) to deploy. This is the first time in many years there has been an 'open call' for volunteers, and many of the soldiers volunteering have been waiting and hoping for many years to get a tour. Once each Area coughs up its huge numbers, they won’t be able to replicate that for several years. We’ve never taken Reservists in numbers like this for such a sustained period, and I doubt the Army will find the second call as successful. 

Haggis said:
True.  They'll come into a Regiment populated by leaders and soldiers with real-world, recent operational experience except that, oh yeah, you don't think Reserve NCOs should go.

First – I was referring to recruits who join their units now, when they are semi-crippled for lack of NCOs and experienced troops. After the veterans return, then yes – the units will be as you describe them, and we all gain.
Second- I never said Reserve NCOs should not go overseas. I stated they don’t have the experience/training as their Reg F counterparts, and I questioned if the Reserve Company concept was the best way to employ reservists.

Haggis said:
Remember that the COs allowed this to happen. Likely they're looking at "short term pain for long term gain".  Contrary to your belief, they obviously saw the benefits in letting their NCOs deploy.

Of course there’s a benefit to NCOs and troops deploying, I never stated there was not.

I like the points mentioned by Flawed Design, and I completely agree with all of them - the Reserves need more courses, and more operationally-focused courses and conversions. Unfortunately, the divide seems to keep growing - in the Infantry, we get the Milcot instead of the G-Wagen, we don't see programs like Gunfighter or updated Urbans Ops tactics, we never see armoured vehicles and get almost no experience with Helo Ops or similar specialties.  To be operationally relevant, the Reserves need better training - but that will likely mean taking resources from the Regs.

Staff Weenie said:
Enfield - suck back and reload here - go back and read your basic history texts on WWI and WWII combat. Rotation in/out of the lines was particular to each nation's approach, and could differ greatly. Some nations ground their Divisions to a pulp before replacing them. Having units in high intensity combat day in, day out, for over a month, was entirely within the realm of possibility.

I replied to this in the Military History Forum - didn't want to get off topic here.

And so ends the longest time I've ever put into a post. Good thing my girlfriend isn't home. I look forward to the replies - and now, I need some food.
 
Western army reservists prepare for big deployment to Afghanistan

STEVE LAMBERT

WINNIPEG (CP) - Army reserve units from Western Canada are preparing for their biggest deployment since the Korean War.

As many as 550 reservists will be sent to Afghanistan next February - about 200 more than the usual western contingent.

Some will start training full-time alongside regular soldiers this April.
http://www.recorder.ca/cp/National/070228/n0228124A.html

      We will definitely be seeing more Reserves on all future deployments.
 
dapaterson said:
The problem is that many units just don't do their admin.  Look at NES as an indicator: There are units with a single NES member of a year or more; there are others with dozens.  Untis are resourced the same - why do some keep records up to date and others not?

It's not just the units.  It's the ASUs who won't give a Reservist shots or a dental DAG until they have a tasking message in thier hot little hands.  It's the NDIS who won't issue a premanenet I card to a Reservist until he's served two full years (unless he's an officer) or has a tasking message.  It's the whole HR world which insists on duplicating not just personnel information but personnel information systems "because Monitor MASS is better than PeopleSoft is better than SAP etc.etc." but no matter what those "official" systems say, you still have to DAG GREEN in CFTPO.  ::) No wonder we can't find out who's where, who's deployable, who's not and just sort ourselves the f**k out!

It's a chain of command issue - commanders at all levels have to push for this.  The resources are there, but too many commanders re-allocate them to "higher priorities".  It's time to remind folks of what the priorities should be.

You and I need to go for a lot of beers some day. :eek:
 
Enfield said:
There are two different issues here, and I’ll try to clarify them:
1) Reservists are not as well trained and experienced as the Regular Force, simply because of part vs full time. At the Pte/Cpl level this can be rectified relatively quickly and easily, and Reserve NCM's brought up to speed. At the NCO/Officer level this becomes more difficult; there is a greater difference in experience and formal courses between the Regs and Reservists. I don’t see how this difference can be closed – the courses take years to get, and the experience even longer.

The Reserves need to send people from all rank levels on all types of operations (not just to Afghanistan).  The Reserve needs to build a base of operationally expereinced and capable leaders and soldiers.  The Reg F can't be the sole resource for Reserve training as this amounts to a huge brain drain on the Reg F.  The Reserves have to become self sustaining.

Reserve Companies are one way to employ reservists on operation, augmentation is another option, and Reserve-centric specialties like CIMIC and PsyOps a third, and there are others. Given my own experience with Reserve Companies, and the things I hear from others, I don’t believe that Reserve Companies offer the best way to integrate Reservists into operations, and one of the reasons I don’t believe they are optimal is because of the wide gulf between the Reg F NCO/Officer standard and the Res F NCO/Officer standard.

15 years ago (a guesstimate) no Reg F rifle companies had seen high intensity operations.  They had to start bulding thier experience and learning what works/doesn't work.  The Reserves are somewhat in the same boat.  As I stated in another thread, The Reserves are now developing a pool of operationally experienced leaders who can train the next generations.  The Army must keep that trend going.

The Army has decreed that infantry reservists require One Year of pre-training to be allowed to a) operate as pte/cpl in a Reg F infantry section, or b) guard a gate and escort convoys under Reservist leadership, so as far as I can tell, the Army agrees with me.

Really?  Then why are Battle group augmentees only reporting in February for August deployments?


- the Reserves need more courses, and more operationally-focused courses and conversions. Unfortunately, the divide seems to keep growing - in the Infantry, we get the Milcot instead of the G-Wagen, we don't see programs like Gunfighter or updated Urbans Ops tactics, we never see armoured vehicles and get almost no experience with Helo Ops or similar specialties.  To be operationally relevant, the Reserves need better training - but that will likely mean taking resources from the Regs.

The Reg F barely has the capacity to train itself, let alone deal with any surge produced by successful and agressive recruiting or a requiremnt to train Reservists.

And so ends the longest time I've ever put into a post.

Congratulations and well done. :salute:
 
I just coming back from Fort Bliss with TF 3-07...  My coy is task for CNS and we are a full reserve Pl inside the coy.  We were trained like all the rest of the coy, did the same thing and all.  The only big difference was the types of vehicles to carry us...  The coy staff (reg F) was really happy with what they saw...  The CSM and the rest of the coy staff were very protective of us, we were in the team.  It's all a matter of attitude...I guess.  So what is the problem ?  :army:  :salute:
 
FMR...

I know a few Maj & Capt types in the ECN for 3/07 & did not hear about any problem but I'm a little concerned about the comment "coy staff were very protective of us"... WHY?

was there a problem for them to go into protective mode?

If you read this thread, pert much everyone is in favor of the proclaimed boosting of reserve contribution to overseas missions - lord knows it's already happened.

Ft Bliss    done
CMTC    ____
Kandahar____
 
Back
Top