Australian response to new Operation
- Thread starter dimsum
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 19,277
- Points
- 1,280
Looks like they’re not sending any hardware either.
www.abc.net.au
Australia declines US request for Red Sea warship, sending personnel instead
Australia will not send a warship to the Red Sea as part of international efforts to safeguard cargo from attacks by Iranian-backed Houthi rebels.
www.abc.net.au
- Reaction score
- 22,193
- Points
- 1,260
Other than the 3 Hobarts, they don’t have much else to send, as the ANZAC Frigates aren’t much for AD.Looks like they’re not sending any hardware either.
Australia declines US request for Red Sea warship, sending personnel instead
Australia will not send a warship to the Red Sea as part of international efforts to safeguard cargo from attacks by Iranian-backed Houthi rebels.
Looks like they’re not sending any hardware either.
Australia declines US request for Red Sea warship, sending personnel instead
Australia will not send a warship to the Red Sea as part of international efforts to safeguard cargo from attacks by Iranian-backed Houthi rebels.
Yeah but they’re sending six staff officers. We need to close the staff officer gap!
- Reaction score
- 19,277
- Points
- 1,280
Hmm it says the 6 will be closing the staff officer gap with Canada. I guess we secretly contributed other staff officers to CMF
- Reaction score
- 10,185
- Points
- 1,360
I means, it's an AAW Destroyer, so very suitable to protecting Shipping. And the ANZAC have double the x of ESSM that a Halifax Class does.
My guess is the Aussies have an eye on China and need to commit forces to their sphere of influence.
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 19,277
- Points
- 1,280
They also have huge problems staffing their ships.
The RAN has attrition stats that would make the RCN look good by comparison.
As well as a radar that's more capable than the SMART-S on the Halifax class.
Similar threads
