Laugh all you want, but AI is going to end up doing 75% of what doctors do and I can tell you from personal experience that with chronic issues your better off belonging to a group that suffers from similar than to purely rely on the current healthcare system.
Ummmm.........don't understand what you are trying to say here Colin. Perhaps some context would help.Laugh all you want, but AI is going to end up doing 75% of what doctors do and I can tell you from personal experience that with chronic issues your better off belonging to a group that suffers from similar than to purely rely on the current healthcare system.
I totally get what he’s saying. Especially if you have a rare chronic condition, communities of other suffers can be incredibly supportive and informative compared to an hour with your doctor once or twice a month, when they may never have encountered your condition before.Ummmm.........don't understand what you are trying to say here Colin. Perhaps some context would help.
And that is the context I was looking for, albeit from a different source. My comment wasn't meant to be critical, rather quizzical.I totally get what he’s saying. Especially if you have a rare chronic condition, communities of other suffers can be incredibly supportive and informative compared to an hour with your doctor once or twice a month, when they may never have encountered your condition before.
While the pic above was satire, Colin’s not wrong- the healthcare system does pretty well with most stuff most of the time for most people. The farther outside of the normal distribution your health problems are, the tougher good care can be to get.
Interesting website.Zerohedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
Interesting website.
![]()
ZeroHedge
CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence.mediabiasfactcheck.com
Basic math. Flatten the curve. Deaths over Time. The only way to flatten the curve was to stretch the time frame which would essentially lower the curve. Flattening the curve just simply meant you are not gone get sick now you will get sick later. Slowing down an infection doesn't stop it. The whole point according to the politicians and medical community was to not overload the health care system.I tried to find any other webpage that supported the above post and couldn't find one.
Its low now because so many people freakin' died......I'll take our cough lockdowns thanks.
BC had more Opioid deaths per yer then Covid. If life actually meant anything we would have done something about it.Sweden’s still running about double our death rate per capita, and between 2.5 - 3x case rate per capita. Not sure they’re as good a comparison as some would think? With their death rate we’d have about 55,000 dead Canadians. At double the case rate I expect we’d have seen critical care system collapse in Ontario, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and possibly BC and Quebec.
I don’t understand why Sweden still gets touted the way it does. The only way their results can be held to be ‘better’ is by discarding a lot of human life.
I don't understand where you get the highlighted part. From the same Worldometer site:Sweden's dry tinder got lit up and burned up compared to lets say Canada where we simply have a smouldering fire. Same numbers in the end of dead. The only difference will be how much it will cost to reach those end numbers.