Search results

And that's it right there. Opinion based on YouTube, Newsmax, and bad dreams dressed up as "free thought". Everything wrong is the fault of those not in power. All hail the Esteemed Leader who can do no wrong. He brought coal mining back (he didn't). He replaced Obamacare with something better...

You think her emails is the same as telling people the election was stolen? Not what I said. The 2016 shooter in Dallas (I assume that's what you're talking about?) did not kill those cops based on politicians telling him for months that the election was stolen and that he should take the power...

Probably because the Democrats, in a general sense, have far more common sense than the Trump Republicans? That's why when his group bleated "lock her up" and all the other garbage, for four years, while in power, nobody on the other side killed a cop by beating him to death.

I mean, we have several levels of UAVs - none able to drop, like you say. Wasn't sure if you meant we had none at all.

Do you mean that we don't have UAVs with weapons on them?

I'm simply arguing that your use of the word monopoly makes as much sense as saying Apple has a monopoly on personal computers. A monopoly has one owner. A group of companies making up a monopoly have to be owned by the same owner. Like the board game of the same name. Or say a nation where the...

Sure. Not sure what that has to do with fuel sellers all trying for a maximum market share to make maximum profits. A monopoly is a single seller with a unique product. That's not what gas stations are. There are a dozen restaurants selling hamburgers in my town; does the observation that they...

You mean capitalism?

Both of us?

Right. So if the anti-Trumpers who initially helped fund it hadn't done so, he wouldn't have been triggered into becoming what many believe is the most below-average POTUS in modern history. Yeah, you're probably right.

No - I was actually agreeing with your idea that if you spread crap, you will likely step in it. However - some of the conclusions in the partially-Democrat-funded Steele Dossier have since been verified by U.S. intelligence agencies, to wit, Russia played an interfering role in the 2016 U.S...

Which is why the Democrats are preparing impeachment proceedings against the sitting president.

Unsubstantiated claims, just like parts of the Steele Dossier.

By singling out and persecuting do you mean arresting them if they break the law?

And one dead cop.

Well, sure, but if I had a grenade's worth of explosive to utilize, I'd likely aim it at a couple of local Iraqi cops in a regular cop car, rather than an up-armoured section/platoon of U.S. soldiers, with a casualty ratio to match.

You don't see anything mentioned where? On the grant announcement?

Fine - that's your opinion. Can you share the link showing evidence that these grant recipients employ a less-than-scientific-method? Shouldn't we be telling somebody about this if it can be verified?

Some people seem a bit triggered. What exactly is the issue with determining if there's a scientific method to identify military members who hold extremist views? I, for one, have never seen anyone sexually assault anyone - does that mean it doesn't happen? Are you under the impression that...

How was his comment smug? Looked like a statement of fact with a smiley emoji. Is that the smug emoji?