• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Search results

  1. C

    FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities

    Stumbled across this on the Airbus "X" feed. Looks like some progress is being made qualifying this aircraft for its intended missions.
  2. C

    CMMA - replacing the CP140 Aurora

    A bit more on this here, including the cost to buy the 3 other used planes ($150 million), that pilots have been training in the UK since January, and that there will be three bases (one in the east, one in the west and one in the north). That last is a bit puzzling, since the article states...
  3. C

    MGEN William "Brian" Vernon, CD (Retired)

    I just dug up my copy. Not sure who created the program, but then BGen Vernon was a big proponent. RIP
  4. C

    Replacing the Subs

    This is an interesting video from HI Sutton on the Korean KSSIII. Mostly covers the Batch 1s, but some preliminary details on the Batch 2s:
  5. C

    Replacing the Subs

    Perhaps the Libs are planning a major procurement spree, as suggested by Richard Shimooka in this article: https://thehub.ca/2023-05-02/richard-shimooka-as-nato-allies-grow-impatient-canada-may-be-quietly-planning-major-increase-in-defence-spending/
  6. C

    Replacing the Subs

    As far as I know the CPSP is still in requirements definition, so all this stuff with Korea is a bit puzzling.
  7. C

    Replacing the Subs

    More interesting stuff related to the Korean subs and Canada: https://www.navalnews.com/event-news/madex-2023/2023/06/video-kss-iii-submarine-at-madex-2023/
  8. C

    Maritime Coastal Defence Vessels (MCDVs)

    If there is a tie-up between Heddle and Seaspsan, would the 1000 ton limit apply anymore? In theory, the only limiting factor then would be Seawaymax restrictions.
  9. C

    Opportunity to update the CC-150 fleet?

    Correct. 13 tons extra, in fact. Don't think it will be through the use of internal pods, however. Note that the "standard" MRTT already carries more fuel than the Pegasus. https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/42417/lockheed-is-bringing-back-the-airbus-a330-tanker-to-compete-against-boeing
  10. C

    Opportunity to update the CC-150 fleet?

    I could be wrong, but I don't believe the MRTT uses fuel bladders inside the passenger section - the fuel is all carried in internal tanks.
  11. C

    Opportunity to update the CC-150 fleet?

    According to Airbus, no reconfiguration is required, unless you want to set it up for medical or cargo. It's pretty flexible, so ultimately the best option for those countries with limited defence budgets. Kind of a Swiss army knife aircraft...
  12. C

    Opportunity to update the CC-150 fleet?

    LGen Kenny has been quoted as saying there will be "somewhere around 9". First refueler capable version in 25/26 at the earliest. See page 9 at the following link: Skies Magazine.
  13. C

    Replacing the Subs

    Being reported in Korea that Canada is looking at Korean submarines closely as an option to replace the Victorias. If true, quite interesting. https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/nation/2023/05/205_351075.html
  14. C

    Replacing the Subs

    Correct. It was referred to as the Type 612. Not a lot of detail can be found, but as you reported, it was supposed to be a 4000 ton class SSK.
  15. C

    CMMA - replacing the CP140 Aurora

    Did it look like this?
  16. C

    New Canadian Shipbuilding Strategy

    Davie is officially in as the "third shipyard" qualified for NSS work: https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/davie-shipyard-joins-national-shipbuilding-program-1.6800866
  17. C

    Boeing to offer P-8 as CP-140 Replacement

    Also posted on the CMMA thread: https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/canada-picks-boeings-p-8a-211256251.html
  18. C

    CMMA - replacing the CP140 Aurora

    More on this: https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/canada-market-16-military-surveillance-214844743.html
  19. C

    Lets get real, Canada and talk defence.

    Not sure this is the proper thread for this, but if you want to provide input to the next Defence Policy Update, which I would highly encourage, here is the place to do it...
Back
Top