• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Canada says it will look at increasing its defence spending and tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever growing sanctions list.

By Tonda MacCharles
Ottawa Bureau
Mon., March 7, 2022

Riga, LATVIA—On the 13th day of the brutal Russian bid to claim Ukraine as its own, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is showing up at the Latvian battle group led by Canadian soldiers, waving the Maple Leaf and a vague hint at more money for the military.

Canada has been waving the NATO flag for nearly seven years in Latvia as a bulwark against Russia’s further incursions in Eastern Europe.

Canada stepped up to lead one of NATO’s four battle groups in 2015 — part of the defensive alliance’s display of strength and solidarity with weaker member states after Russia invaded Ukraine and seized the Crimean peninsula in 2014. Trudeau arrived in the Latvian capital late Monday after meetings in the U.K. with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Netherlands Prime Minister Mark Rutte.

Earlier Monday, faced with a seemingly unstoppable war in Ukraine, Trudeau said he will look at increasing Canada’s defence spending. Given world events, he said there are “certainly reflections to have.”

And Canada tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever-growing sanctions list.

The latest round of sanctions includes names Trudeau said were identified by jailed Russian opposition leader and Putin nemesis Alexei Navalny.

However, on a day when Trudeau cited the new sanctions, and Johnson touted new measures meant to expose Russian property owners in his country, Rutte admitted sanctions are not working.

Yet they all called for more concerted international efforts over the long haul, including more economic measures and more humanitarian aid, with Johnson and Rutte divided over how quickly countries need to get off Russian oil and gas.

The 10 latest names on Canada’s target list do not include Roman Abramovich — a Russian billionaire Navalny has been flagging to Canada since at least 2017. Canada appears to have sanctioned about 20 of the 35 names on Navalny’s list.

The Conservative opposition says the Liberal government is not yet exerting maximum pressure on Putin, and should do more to bolster Canadian Forces, including by finally approving the purchase of fighter jets.

Foreign affairs critic Michael Chong said in an interview that Ottawa must still sanction “additional oligarchs close to President Putin who have significant assets in Canada.”

Abramovich owns more than a quarter of the public shares in steelmaking giant Evraz, which has operations in Alberta and Saskatchewan and has supplied most of the steel for the government-owned Trans Mountain pipeline project.

Evraz’s board of directors also includes two more Russians the U.S. government identified as “oligarchs” in 2019 — Aleksandr Abramov and Aleksandr Frolov — and its Canadian operations have received significant support from the federal government.

That includes at least $27 million in emergency wage subsidies during the pandemic, as well as $7 million through a fund meant to help heavy-polluters reduce emissions that cause climate change, according to the company’s most recent annual report.

In addition to upping defence spending, the Conservatives want NORAD’s early warning system upgraded, naval shipbuilding ramped up and Arctic security bolstered.

In London, Johnson sat down with Trudeau and Rutte at the Northolt airbase. Their morning meetings had a rushed feel, with Johnson starting to usher press out before Trudeau spoke. His office said later that the British PM couldn’t squeeze the full meeting in at 10 Downing Street because Johnson’s “diary” was so busy that day. The three leaders held an afternoon news conference at 10 Downing.

But before that Trudeau met with the Queen, saying she was “insightful” and they had a “useful, for me anyway, conversation about global affairs.”

Trudeau meets with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg Tuesday in Latvia.

The prime minister will also meet with three Baltic leaders, the prime ministers of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, in the Latvian capital of Riga.

The Liberals announced they would increase the 500 Canadian Forces in Latvia by another 460 troops. The Canadians are leading a multinational battle group, one of four that are part of NATO’s deployments in the region.

Another 3,400 Canadians could be deployed to the region in the months to come, on standby for NATO orders.

But Canada’s shipments of lethal aid to Ukraine were slow to come in the view of the Conservatives, and the Ukrainian Canadian community.

And suddenly Western allies are eyeing each other’s defence commitments.

At the Downing Street news conference, Rutte noted the Netherlands will increase its defence budget to close to two per cent of GDP. Germany has led the G7, and doubled its defence budget in the face of Putin’s invasion and threats. Johnson said the U.K. defence spending is about 2.4 per cent and declined to comment on Canada’s defence spending which is 1.4 per cent of GDP.

But Johnson didn’t hold back.

“What we can’t do, post the invasion of Ukraine is assume that we go back to a kind of status quo ante, a kind of new normalization in the way that we did after the … seizure of Crimea and the Donbas area,” Johnson said. “We’ve got to recognize that things have changed and that we need a new focus on security and I think that that is kind of increasingly understood by everybody.”

Trudeau stood by his British and Dutch counterparts and pledged Canada would do more.

He defended his government’s record, saying Ottawa is gradually increasing spending over the next decade by 70 per cent. Then Trudeau admitted more might be necessary.

“We also recognize that context is changing rapidly around the world and we need to make sure that women and men have certainty and our forces have all the equipment necessary to be able to stand strongly as we always have. As members of NATO. We will continue to look at what more we can do.”

The three leaders — Johnson, a conservative and Trudeau and Rutte, progressive liberals — in a joint statement said they “will continue to impose severe costs on Russia.”

Arriving for the news conference from Windsor Castle, Trudeau had to detour to enter Downing Street as loud so-called Freedom Convoy protesters bellowed from outside the gate. They carried signs marked “Tuck Frudeau” and “Free Tamara” (Lich).

Protester Jeff Wyatt who said he has no Canadian ties told the Star he came to stand up for Lich and others who were leading a “peaceful protest” worldwide against government “lies” about COVID-19 and what he called Trudeau’s “tyranny.”

Elsewhere in London, outside the Russian embassy, other protesters and passersby reflected on what they said was real tyranny — the Russian attack on Ukraine. “I think we should be as tough as possible to get this stopped, as tough as possible,” said protester Clive Martinez.
 
The thing that kept them going was a word you don't here much of these days: Ambition. You go to a job interview and you get asked "where do you see yourself in 5 years?" You don't get asked "what is your ambition?" There is a difference there. One is limited. The other is unlimited. [/QUOTE said:
I currently don't have any employees but when I did ambition was something I didn't want in a candidate. I look for someone who is smart but not ambitious.

Ambition causes people to move on and training costs too much. And higher pay won't keep them.

I have also heard the same from other small business owners.

Side note, I was once asked where I see myself in 5 years. The interviewer was confounded why I was applying for a job beneath my training (there was not much available). At the end of the interview i asked where she saw the company in 5 years. She didn't have an answer. I said "you want to grow the business and expand, you will then have a position I trained for" I think she was upset because I didn't get the job.
 
People want to work. People don't want to get screwed over. The sooner we realize and accept that, the better.
And bingo - there is the crux of the matter. Corporations don't exist to please the employees or the public. They exist to make money for the shareholders. And some corporations will screw their employees and their customers.
 

I didn't make the world. I barely exist in it.

One negotiated benefit Millennials take for granted now, that our generation never had,

Under their collective agreement,

Following a difficult or critical call - as defined by the paramedic - they are taken out of service and de-briefed by the staff psychologist.

Then sent home.

If they feel the need - and their physician and / or supervisor agree - they can take the next two 12-hour shifts off.
No loss of pay, or deduction from the member's sick bank.

After that, if they still feel the need, and have a note from their doctor, they can go on indefinite modified duty. ie: removal from 9-1-1 operations.

Eventually, if the PTSD is determined to be a Permanent Partial Disability ( PPD ), they are permanently removed from 9-1-1 operations and relocated into a "suitable" job.

If the pre-injury rate of pay is higher than the relocated position rate, then the pre-injury rate is to be maintained. It is understood that the pre-injury rate is subject to all wage increases negotiated

That's progress. It had to be negotiated.
 
Don't think of it as "this generation vs that generation"

Think of it as this generation tried to make things better, and made some mistakes (big and small)
The next generation tries to better and makes some new mistakes or unintentionally repeats old mistakes

30s-Depression and Farm Cropping collapse, Farmers try to come up with better solutions (NRCS was created then)
40s-Fought a global war against downright oppressive regimes
50s-Buidling a stronger industrial economy, more mechanical farming methods, continued stand up against oppression, this time communism
60s-Peace movement (kind of needed) to make the governments slow down a bit and start questioning how/when they go to war (Viet Nam)
70s-Disco (puke) and I was born (your welcome world or look the fook out)
80s-Economic ups and downs, Glasnot and the the thawing of the cold war
90s-Cold war sort of ends (or goes dormant), global instability however Military did some good (Bosnia example)
2K-War on terror, one of the major changes. Awareness of "climate change"
10s-Continued war on terror, major economic changes (not sure for the better)
20s-We are still working on it.

Just a few examples of things that happened that I believe shaped or shifted societal thinking and decision making in terms of policy, actions and how things are done.

As Allan Savory would say "Unintended consequences...lead to more or worse failure"

You can't really blame anyone generation. Context changed every generation.
 
I didn't make the world. I barely exist in it.

One negotiated benefit Millennials take for granted now, that our generation never had,

Under their collective agreement,

Following a difficult or critical call - as defined by the paramedic - they are taken out of service and de-briefed by the staff psychologist.

Then sent home.

If they feel the need - and their physician and / or supervisor agree - they can take the next two 12-hour shifts off.
No loss of pay, or deduction from the member's sick bank.

After that, if they still feel the need, and have a note from their doctor, they can go on indefinite modified duty. ie: removal from 9-1-1 operations.

Eventually, if the PTSD is determined to be a Permanent Partial Disability ( PPD ), they are permanently removed from 9-1-1 operations and relocated into a "suitable" job.



That's progress. It had to be negotiated.
......and there it is. Just like clockwork.:ROFLMAO:
 
......and there it is. Just like clockwork.:ROFLMAO:

I don't know how many times it has to be explained to you, fishbonejones. I've been ordered not to take your bait, or engage with you.

Don't like it? Take it up with the Site Owner.
 
I don't know how many times it has to be explained to you, fishbonejones. I've been ordered not to take your bait, or engage with you.
So why do you continue to do it? Emojis are engagement. Poking me with a stick, so to speak. Trying to get a rise. You don't take orders very well, do you? I don't care if you engage or not. I'm not asking you for discussion. I'm not chumming, I'm making observations. I don't require verbal input from you, for that. I don't ask for a response. You do that voluntarily, by self identifying.
 
As far as immigrants go we brought in 430000+ in 2022. Maybe they have the wrong skill sets, maybe those skills are recognized, maybe they are the wrong age distribution but in far as raw numbers go what else can we do?
 
As far as immigrants go we brought in 430000+ in 2022. Maybe they have the wrong skill sets, maybe those skills are recognized, maybe they are the wrong age distribution but in far as raw numbers go what else can we do?

Investigate and implement ways to promote parenthood in the current population, and target immigration for stressed and needed professions.
 
Investigate and implement ways to promote parenthood in the current population, and target immigration for stressed and needed professions.

Too expensive to have kids these days and targeted immigration just brain drains countries that need highly skilled workers more than we do. If we take all the doctors and engineers out of Syria, what good does that do?
 
Too expensive to have kids these days and targeted immigration just brain drains countries that need highly skilled workers more than we do. If we take all the doctors and engineers out of Syria, what good does that do?

Do you want my honest answer?
 
Too expensive to have kids these days and targeted immigration just brain drains countries that need highly skilled workers more than we do. If we take all the doctors and engineers out of Syria, what good does that do?
Well when we make it near impossible for them to get accredited here, it's a waste, that's one of the biggest problems with out immigration systems. I'd bet $100 if you hired an immigrant to the RCAF from Kuwait or Malaysia with hundreds of hours working on F-18s, we wouldn't PLAR a single screw.
 
Well when we make it near impossible for them to get accredited here, it's a waste, that's one of the biggest problems with out immigration systems. I'd bet $100 if you hired an immigrant to the RCAF from Kuwait or Malaysia with hundreds of hours working on F-18s, we wouldn't PLAR a single screw.

Well Kuwaitis have ex-US Navy, with a few RCAF guys that released and went back over after OP Impact fixing their f-18s, but I see your point.

Do you want my honest answer?

I want the truth!
 
Back
Top