• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Canada says it will look at increasing its defence spending and tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever growing sanctions list.

By Tonda MacCharles
Ottawa Bureau
Mon., March 7, 2022

Riga, LATVIA—On the 13th day of the brutal Russian bid to claim Ukraine as its own, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is showing up at the Latvian battle group led by Canadian soldiers, waving the Maple Leaf and a vague hint at more money for the military.

Canada has been waving the NATO flag for nearly seven years in Latvia as a bulwark against Russia’s further incursions in Eastern Europe.

Canada stepped up to lead one of NATO’s four battle groups in 2015 — part of the defensive alliance’s display of strength and solidarity with weaker member states after Russia invaded Ukraine and seized the Crimean peninsula in 2014. Trudeau arrived in the Latvian capital late Monday after meetings in the U.K. with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Netherlands Prime Minister Mark Rutte.

Earlier Monday, faced with a seemingly unstoppable war in Ukraine, Trudeau said he will look at increasing Canada’s defence spending. Given world events, he said there are “certainly reflections to have.”

And Canada tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever-growing sanctions list.

The latest round of sanctions includes names Trudeau said were identified by jailed Russian opposition leader and Putin nemesis Alexei Navalny.

However, on a day when Trudeau cited the new sanctions, and Johnson touted new measures meant to expose Russian property owners in his country, Rutte admitted sanctions are not working.

Yet they all called for more concerted international efforts over the long haul, including more economic measures and more humanitarian aid, with Johnson and Rutte divided over how quickly countries need to get off Russian oil and gas.

The 10 latest names on Canada’s target list do not include Roman Abramovich — a Russian billionaire Navalny has been flagging to Canada since at least 2017. Canada appears to have sanctioned about 20 of the 35 names on Navalny’s list.

The Conservative opposition says the Liberal government is not yet exerting maximum pressure on Putin, and should do more to bolster Canadian Forces, including by finally approving the purchase of fighter jets.

Foreign affairs critic Michael Chong said in an interview that Ottawa must still sanction “additional oligarchs close to President Putin who have significant assets in Canada.”

Abramovich owns more than a quarter of the public shares in steelmaking giant Evraz, which has operations in Alberta and Saskatchewan and has supplied most of the steel for the government-owned Trans Mountain pipeline project.

Evraz’s board of directors also includes two more Russians the U.S. government identified as “oligarchs” in 2019 — Aleksandr Abramov and Aleksandr Frolov — and its Canadian operations have received significant support from the federal government.

That includes at least $27 million in emergency wage subsidies during the pandemic, as well as $7 million through a fund meant to help heavy-polluters reduce emissions that cause climate change, according to the company’s most recent annual report.

In addition to upping defence spending, the Conservatives want NORAD’s early warning system upgraded, naval shipbuilding ramped up and Arctic security bolstered.

In London, Johnson sat down with Trudeau and Rutte at the Northolt airbase. Their morning meetings had a rushed feel, with Johnson starting to usher press out before Trudeau spoke. His office said later that the British PM couldn’t squeeze the full meeting in at 10 Downing Street because Johnson’s “diary” was so busy that day. The three leaders held an afternoon news conference at 10 Downing.

But before that Trudeau met with the Queen, saying she was “insightful” and they had a “useful, for me anyway, conversation about global affairs.”

Trudeau meets with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg Tuesday in Latvia.

The prime minister will also meet with three Baltic leaders, the prime ministers of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, in the Latvian capital of Riga.

The Liberals announced they would increase the 500 Canadian Forces in Latvia by another 460 troops. The Canadians are leading a multinational battle group, one of four that are part of NATO’s deployments in the region.

Another 3,400 Canadians could be deployed to the region in the months to come, on standby for NATO orders.

But Canada’s shipments of lethal aid to Ukraine were slow to come in the view of the Conservatives, and the Ukrainian Canadian community.

And suddenly Western allies are eyeing each other’s defence commitments.

At the Downing Street news conference, Rutte noted the Netherlands will increase its defence budget to close to two per cent of GDP. Germany has led the G7, and doubled its defence budget in the face of Putin’s invasion and threats. Johnson said the U.K. defence spending is about 2.4 per cent and declined to comment on Canada’s defence spending which is 1.4 per cent of GDP.

But Johnson didn’t hold back.

“What we can’t do, post the invasion of Ukraine is assume that we go back to a kind of status quo ante, a kind of new normalization in the way that we did after the … seizure of Crimea and the Donbas area,” Johnson said. “We’ve got to recognize that things have changed and that we need a new focus on security and I think that that is kind of increasingly understood by everybody.”

Trudeau stood by his British and Dutch counterparts and pledged Canada would do more.

He defended his government’s record, saying Ottawa is gradually increasing spending over the next decade by 70 per cent. Then Trudeau admitted more might be necessary.

“We also recognize that context is changing rapidly around the world and we need to make sure that women and men have certainty and our forces have all the equipment necessary to be able to stand strongly as we always have. As members of NATO. We will continue to look at what more we can do.”

The three leaders — Johnson, a conservative and Trudeau and Rutte, progressive liberals — in a joint statement said they “will continue to impose severe costs on Russia.”

Arriving for the news conference from Windsor Castle, Trudeau had to detour to enter Downing Street as loud so-called Freedom Convoy protesters bellowed from outside the gate. They carried signs marked “Tuck Frudeau” and “Free Tamara” (Lich).

Protester Jeff Wyatt who said he has no Canadian ties told the Star he came to stand up for Lich and others who were leading a “peaceful protest” worldwide against government “lies” about COVID-19 and what he called Trudeau’s “tyranny.”

Elsewhere in London, outside the Russian embassy, other protesters and passersby reflected on what they said was real tyranny — the Russian attack on Ukraine. “I think we should be as tough as possible to get this stopped, as tough as possible,” said protester Clive Martinez.
 
When Germans start talking about the Arctic, maybe we should listen. A recent article from Stern Magazine (translated by Google)

The original is here:

CONFLICT BETWEEN WEST AND EAST Russia and NATO: Why the Arctic could become "an arena of great power competition".​

A US soldier takes part in the international military exercise Cold Response 22 in Sandy Beach, north of Norway

A US soldier takes part in the international military exercise Cold Response 22 in Sandy Beach, north of Norway
© Jonathan NACKSTRAND / AFP
Soften rune

by Rune Weichert
04/14/2022, 06:09 am6 min reading time
At the moment, the fronts between Russia and NATO are harder than they have been for a long time because of the Ukraine war, especially in Eastern Europe. Another conflict between Russia and the West is smoldering in the icy north – with implications for climate research.
" Russia 's war against Ukraine is a turning point. It's a new normal for European security. And Arctic security, too." That's what NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said on March 25 during a press conference . The Ukraine war had already shaken security in Europe at this point.

In the freezing Arctic, far from the horrors and horrors of Ukraine, the conflict between Russia and NATO could find a new arena.
NATO is also an Arctic alliance, according to Stoltenberg, four out of five countries bordering the Arctic are NATO states: the USA, Canada, Greenland (administered by Denmark) and Norway. "It is a region of strategic importance for the security of the entire Euro-Atlantic area," said the NATO Secretary General. "And crucial for communications links between North America and Europe. It's also a region of growing strategic competition. In recent years we've seen a significant increase in Russian military activity here."

Russia is expanding its military in the Arctic​

Russia has rebuilt Soviet-era Arctic bases, says Stoltenberg . The region is a testing ground for many of the country's new weapon systems. And it is home to Russia's strategic submarine fleet.

"Russia's military build-up is the most serious challenge to the stability and security of the Allies in the far north," Stoltenberg is certain.
The Ukrainian President Zelenskyj also issued a warning to the country during a speech in the Norwegian parliament. "I think you feel new risks on your borders with Russia in the Arctic ," he said at the end of March , stressing that Russia has made a significant upgrade of its Arctic forces in recent years. "They [Russia] have built such a large army up there [in the Arctic] that no common sense can explain it," Zelenskyy said. "Who is she against? And why are you doing this?"
In fact, the geopolitical role of the Arctic is coming back onto the agenda with the war in Ukraine. Because the "widespread military build-up since 2007 increases the potential for a conflict between Russia and NATO-allied states to spill over into the region," analyzes the specialist magazine "Foreign Policy" .
https://www.stern.de/reise/europa/l...se-bluie-east-two-auf-groenland-31479574.html

The Arctic harbors many resources​

The Arctic is of great interest to many of the riparian states for a number of reasons. On the one hand there are the natural resources such as gas and oil, which are mainly found in the Russian part of the Arctic. Even if Europe wants to detach itself from fossil fuels from Russia, the continent is still dependent on it.
But it's not just about gas and oil. Minerals, fish stocks, shorter shipping routes between Asia and Europe - all this makes the Arctic interesting for many countries. Climate change and melting ice have uncovered the resources - or will do so in the coming years. Russian President Vladimir Putin could also use Russian resources to further expand his ties with China, which is also eyeing the Arctic region. China, although closer to the equator than the Arctic Circle, has defined itself as a "Near Arctic State" and wants to establish a presence there, Stoltenberg said.
The military build-up at the North Pole poses a danger, writes "Foreign Policy" : "The increasing military activity in the region continues to increase the risk of a misunderstanding or of a conflict spreading to the Arctic from outside, especially in the absence of an official security authority for national actors , through which regional defense issues could be addressed."



Video abspielen

The USA and Canada are arming the "Northern Flank".​

Militarily, Russia's extensive defense build-up and alternating military exercises by both Russia and NATO actors have created a potentially unstable region. Against the background of growing tensions between the USA and Russia and the increasing decoupling of the US and Chinese economies, the Arctic is developing into "an arena of great power competition".
The US is already responding. The military and Homeland Security have published reports with titles such as "Regaining Arctic Dominance" , "Arctic Strategy" or "A Blue Arctic" . Exercises in the polar region and reinforcement of the military on site are also intended to set an example. A sign that is also addressed to Russia. The NATO exercise "Cold Response" was held in Norway in March, in which 27 member states and partners took part.
Neighboring Canada also wants to strengthen NATO's "northern flank". Canada's chief of defense, General Wayne Eyre, warns that "much more effort" is needed to strengthen internal security with a strong "focus on the north," as reported by broadcaster France 24 . The Arctic is a region with a particular security policy focus.
Like NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg, Eyre also notes that Russia has reoccupied former Cold War bases over the past decade. "It is not inconceivable that our sovereignty could be called into question." But experts like Michael Byers of the University of British Columbia consider a Russian invasion of Canada to be "completely irrational for Russia." NATO should be more concerned about the military presence in Russia's north-west, such as the nuclear-powered ballistic-missile submarines stationed in Murmansk. However, Russia also has missiles that could reach Canada and the US.


The Arctic Council boycotts Russia​

One problem in the Arctic is that there is no proper management system. Nothing resembling the European Union or the UN. There is an Arctic Council that was founded in 1996. The aim of the council is cooperation and coordination between the eight riparian states and indigenous peoples in the region. National, regional and international agreements are implemented. But the work of the Arctic Council is currently on hold.
Seven of the eight members of the Arctic Council condemn Russia's war of aggression. The eighth member is Russia itself. No other member (i.e. Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden and the US) wants to travel to Russia for meetings of the Council, which currently holds the presidency, according to a joint statement by the means seven states.
But that shot could backfire. Limited dialogue and transparency on military issues, limited ability to implement governance agreements, and tensions among Arctic states could present an opportunity or motivation for states to resolve conflicts in ways other than through regional cooperation, including military ones, states in a report by the think tank Rand Corp. from 2021. One solution would be to resume dialogue, improve transparency on military issues and "allow for more inclusivity in Arctic-related decisions without challenging the sovereignty of Arctic states."

Arctic climate research on hiatus​

The tensions in the Arctic also raise concerns about research, especially climate research, but also about the climate itself. Russia occupies around 53 percent of the Arctic coastline. A boycott by the Arctic partner therefore has a significant impact on research in the region. According to Scientific American magazine, this is suspending the Council's efforts on everything from climate change to oil drilling . This is an important problem because temperatures in the Arctic are rising three times faster than the global average. The issue of forest fires in the Arctic has also been addressed by the Council in the past; the problem of thawing permafrost is just as important.

A prolonged hiatus in the Arctic Council's activities could significantly hamper those efforts, Michael Sfraga, chair of the Polar Institute at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and chair of the US Arctic Research Commission, told Scientific American. It could also delay the release of reports summarizing scientific evidence and making recommendations for future action.
And how will NATO react? With an increase in the military presence in the Arctic, as Stoltenberg explained on March 25. More will be needed in the future. "We cannot afford a security vacuum in the far north. It could fuel Russian ambitions that expose NATO and risk misjudgments and misunderstandings." The presence of NATO is not a provocation. Rather, it should avoid conflict and keep the peace. Nevertheless, the tensions in the region are more likely to increase than decrease.

🍻
 
When Germans start talking about the Arctic, maybe we should listen. A recent article from Stern Magazine (translated by Google)

The original is here:




🍻
Neighboring Canada also wants to strengthen NATO's "northern flank". Canada's chief of defense, General Wayne Eyre, warns that "much more effort" is needed to strengthen internal security with a strong "focus on the north," as reported by broadcaster France 24 . The Arctic is a region with a particular security policy focus.


Canada apparently wants to do many things...
 
Neighboring Canada also wants to strengthen NATO's "northern flank". Canada's chief of defense, General Wayne Eyre, warns that "much more effort" is needed to strengthen internal security with a strong "focus on the north," as reported by broadcaster France 24 . The Arctic is a region with a particular security policy focus.


Canada apparently wants to do many things...
Wanting to do things and actually putting the treasure and effort into them are completely separate things.

We talk a good game, but won't actually strap the skates on and play.
 
Neighboring Canada also wants to strengthen NATO's "northern flank". Canada's chief of defense, General Wayne Eyre, warns that "much more effort" is needed to strengthen internal security with a strong "focus on the north," as reported by broadcaster France 24 . The Arctic is a region with a particular security policy focus.


Canada needs to do many things...
Slightly(massively) amended your comment
 
Buy more Iron Maiden albums?

[Add: if I'd known EW against the Soviet hordes would mean sitting in the box of a heated truck and spinning 30% of a CFOX playlist, I would've transferred into Comm Res in 1983...]
 
Get reliable radios with frequency hopping & crypto capabilities compatible with allies.
Without getting too in the weeds, we have both.

The issue at hand is user training and integration. The 6 section as a Support funtion and not as an Operations/Planning function means we don't factor C2IS in the OPP, even when developing requirements for different platforms.

I am convinced that no one with a Jimmy badge was consulted when they built the LAV 6 or TAPV, because they are both horrible to do maintenance on as a Sig.
 
Without getting too in the weeds, we have both.

The issue at hand is user training and integration. The 6 section as a Support funtion and not as an Operations/Planning function means we don't factor C2IS in the OPP, even when developing requirements for different platforms.

I am convinced that no one with a Jimmy badge was consulted when they built the LAV 6 or TAPV, because they are both horrible to do maintenance on. as a Sig.
FTFY.
 
Back
Top