The process of the grievance system is severely flawed IMO. It appears in a vast majority of cases that I’ve become aware of just a stall tactic to cause the aggrieved member to just lose interest.
I’m pretty sure we’re on the same page here, we just haven’t come to a consensus with our wording.
I guess for me, where there’s smoke, there’s fire within the news headlines and especially regarding this thread. Myself, I will continue to give the many complainants the benefit of the doubt...
Or,
Your wife/mother/sister/daughter is raped. Maybe by a predator. You know those women in your life and know they wouldn’t lie, but it just couldn’t be proven. Would you #believeher?
Of course not. But I think you’d want to believe a victim of a sexual assault and not describe their own experience as a flimsy argument to free a guilty man just because maybe an i wasn’t dotted or a t wasn’t crossed.
Take for example that cabbie in Halifax a couple years back. He got off on a...
Sad, isn’t it?
Some would call that “due process”, similar to what Adm McDonald thought, I’d dare say. In that particular case, Lt(N) MacDonald appears to be more correct in what she said in the aftermath. I sailed with her years ago. Wasn’t all that fond of her at the time, but I believe her...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.