Personally I’m of the opinion that it makes no sense to acquire “training” equipment, and that any equipment should be operational items.
Which I one reason I believe in cascading equipment. If you expect an item has a service life of X years, then it goes to a ‘Category A’ unit for 1/2X...
Rename everyone in the Army to Canadian Guards, from A to Z
18 BN Canadian Guards Infantry
6 Reg’ts Canadian Guards Armour
Etc.
I solved two things there.
Well unless your a diehard monarchist;)
There is a realistic max chamber pressure one can achieve, unless the Wankandans pop up and offer us Vibranium. So far I’m not holding my breath.
I still think tube arty has a use, but I’d be putting more and more weight on what multiple launch rocket systems offer.
Honestly perhaps it’s better to fold the PRes Inf units into the Regular Regiments.
1-9 PPCLI
1-9 RCR
1-9 R22eR
(Or maybe 1-6 is a better idea I don’t know the numbers well enough to give an educated opinion).
To keep the symmetrical “needs” appeased you can have:
1 Light (Para) BN at...
Well ERCA is off the table.
https://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/global-force-symposium/2024/03/27/army-artillery-needs-more-range-mobility-and-autonomy-study-finds/
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.