IRepoCans's latest activity
-
IRepoCans reacted to FJAG's post in the thread FORCE 2025: Informing the Army’s future structure with
Like.
I tend to agree and am starting to think that in general all battalions/regiments and brigades should be in a 30/70 or 70/30 RegF to Res... -
IRepoCans replied to the thread FORCE 2025: Informing the Army’s future structure.The PRC-163s are plagued with issues from what I hear; hell an 18E I know is doing all he can to hold onto their MBITRs and 152s. Funny...
-
IRepoCans replied to the thread FORCE 2025: Informing the Army’s future structure.Don't even have to be new, just need to have them, and actually train people on them before a pre-deployment work-up. I'd kill for a...
-
IRepoCans reacted to daftandbarmy's post in the thread FORCE 2025: Informing the Army’s future structure with Like.
What about radios we can use to ctually talk to each other like real soldiers as opposed to, you know, having to share out our smart...
-
IRepoCans replied to the thread FORCE 2025: Informing the Army’s future structure.That's easy the division training centres will take them, or they're tucked in MSA somewhere never to be seen. I was on a reserve PLQ /...
-
IRepoCans replied to the thread FORCE 2025: Informing the Army’s future structure.WP is pretty widespread now (even amongst the white side of SOCOM): Australian Army runs PVS-31As complete for all combat arm units and...
-
IRepoCans reacted to Kirkhill's post in the thread FORCE 2025: Informing the Army’s future structure with Like.
I'll disagree with Kevin. I would go with the AT option. I don't disagree on the risks and benefits associated with the AD option but...
-
IRepoCans reacted to GR66's post in the thread FORCE 2025: Informing the Army’s future structure with Like.
You're 100% right that a properly equipped and supported light force optimized for adaptive dispersed operations and capable of deep...