• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Recent content by IKnowNothing

  1. I

    The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

    Its based on the understanding that they represent a different risk profile to society- handguns via concealment, box fed semis via volume and sustained fire. There's a tonne of double think in this and the Bondi thread acknowledging the capabilty gap then pretzling to justify why it doesnt...
  2. I

    The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

    Personal opinion on where classification should be: Largely fine with the post C-21 definition for NR, and pre C21 definition for Prohib. Handguns were fine under the restricted regime and the ban was silly. C21 definition should have moved the no longer NR's (detachable box fed CF SA's) to...
  3. I

    Trump administration 2024-2028

    A. Damn- my joke was about DJT's image of himself and being a self insert B. Snooty nose turn- none of the movies do the books justice.
  4. I

    Trump administration 2024-2028

    Sauve, principled, outsider who is simultaneously wealthy (self-made of course) and a man of the people, that is successful at everything he touches? The role is clearly cast.
  5. I

    The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

    If you're looking from the lens of capability relative to what is available to the military. That's not the only lens. For many (most) the only change in the last 100+ years is in licensing requirement When you say parity, what do you mean? You were previously adamant that the a gun is gun...
  6. I

    The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

    You just restated what I said. A gradual rise to a baseline, then divergent factors proliferating for relatively short time periods before being removed.
  7. I

    The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

    No- just looking at things over a wider time frame. If you start with said bonanza, sure- you see an inexorable decline. If you start at depression era or before, you see a gradual rise to a baseline, then a multidecade reciprocation as things grow away from that baseline then get taken away...
  8. I

    The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

    Pretty blatant omission of a key word there hoss. Sure a tommy gun or colt monitor was "available", but cost a year's wages and essentially no one had them.
  9. I

    The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

    As discussed yesterday - beneficial function far from the only measure of social utility
  10. I

    The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

    A semi auto .22 and a pump shotgun was used at La Loche, a win 94 .30-30 at Parliament Hill, and Justin Bourque had a pump shotgun in Moncton. We still have knives, axes, the trucks you guys love to point out. It all comes to societal perceptions and the risk-utility curve. Society will accept...
  11. I

    The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

    Or its simply a return to pre ~1964 mainstream commercial availability (albeit with modern construction methods) after a temporarily accepted proliferation of something different.
  12. I

    The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

    Re- read the post 4621. 65 61 (forgot about the cooey 64) years ago.... I could have the exact same guns in the cabinet. We are not experiencing the same trend line.
  13. I

    The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

    History -far, recent, and present- says otherwise.
  14. I

    The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

    Next to none. But that's not the point. The point is interacting with the rules as written and societal perceptions / resistance points to leverage the best outcome possible.
  15. I

    The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

    Except for the end state is the exact same. Type B licenses can have a non-pump manual action shotgun with up to 5 rounds. the only reason for the "minor reclassification" was that the regulation was initially poorly written for purpose and failed to consider new manual action types coming to...
Back
Top